Amplified fragment length polymorphism genetic fingerprinting challenges the taxonomic status of the near-endemic species Chara curta Nolte ex Kütz. (Characeae)

Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society

Volumn 155, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 467-476

  O'Reilly, Clare L ^a   Cowan, Robyn S ^b   Hawkins, Julie A ^c  

^a Royal Botanic Gardens ^*  (United Kingdom)

^b JODRELL LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

AFLP; Charophyta; Conservation genetics; Developmental differentiation; Morphometrics; Phenotypic plasticity; Species delimitation

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION STATUS; DNA FINGERPRINTING; ENDEMIC SPECIES; GREEN ALGA; MORPHOLOGY; MORPHOMETRY; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM; TAXONOMY;

EURASIA; EUROPE; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

CHARA; CHARA ASPERA; CHARACEAE; CHARALES;

EID: 36849068942     PISSN: 00244074     EISSN: 10958339     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2007.00713.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Adams KJ. 1997. The stoneworts of Essex: an interim account. The Essex Naturalist (new series) 14: 115 142.
2. Adams KJ. 2002. New Charophyte (stonewort) records. The Essex Naturalist (new series) 19: 68.
3. van den Berg MS, Coops H, Simons J. 2001. Propagule bank buildup of Chara aspera and its significance for colonization of a shallow lake. Hydrobiologia 462: 9 17.
4. Bonis A, Gemayel P, Grillas P. 1993. Polymorphisme enzymatique et morphologique comparé chez Chara aspera et C. galioides (Charophyceae) en Camargue. Cryptogamie Algologie 14: 115 131.
5. Bryant J, Stewart NF. 2002. Order Charales. In: John DM, Whitton BA, Brook AJ, eds. The freshwater algal flora of the British Isles: an identification guide to freshwater and terrestrial algae. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 593 612.
6. Casanova MT, Brock MA. 1999. Life histories of charophytes from permanent and temporary wetlands in Eastern Australia. Australian Journal of Botany 47: 383 397.
7. Comelles M. 1985. Clave de identificación de las especies de carófitos de la Peninsula Ibérica. Madrid: Asociación Espanola de Limnologia.
8. Corillion R. 1957. Les charophycees de France et d'Europe Occidentale. Rennes: Imprimerie Bretonne.
9. Croy CD. 1982. Chara aspera (Charophyta) - breeding patterns in the Northern hemisphere. Phycologia 21: 243 246.
10. Garcia-Mas J, Oliver M, Gomez-Paniagua H, de Vincente MC. 2000. Comparing AFLP, RAPD and RFLP markers for measuring genetic diversity in melon. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 101: 860 864.
11. Given DR. 1994. Principles and practice of plant conservation. London: Chapman & Hall.
12. Gower JC. 1971. Statistical methods of comparing multivariate analyses of the same data. In: Hodson R, Kendall DG, Tatu P, eds. Mathematics in the archaeological and historical sciences. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 138 149.
13. Grant MC, Proctor VW. 1980. Electrophoretic analysis of genetic variation in the Charophyta I. Gene duplication via polyploidy. Journal of Phycology 16: 109 115.
14. Guerlesquin M. 1980. Récherches recentes sur les charophycees (morphologie et systematique, cytotaxonomic). Bullétin de Société Etudes Scientifique d'Anjou Memoire 4: 143 155.
15. Guiry M. 1992. Species concepts in marine red algae. Progress in Phycology Research 8: 251 278.
16. Hedrén M, Fay MF, Chase MW. 2001. Amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLP) reveal details of polyploid evolution in Dactylorhiza (Orchidaceae). American Journal of Botany 88: 1868 1880.
17. Hood GM. 2005. PopTools, version 2.6.7. URL http://www.cse.csiro.au/ poptools [accessed on 1 September 2005].
18. Jaccard P. 1908. Nouvelles recherches sur la distribution florale. Bulletin de la Société Vaudoise de Science Naturelle 44: 223 270.
19. Jones JM, Simpson GE, Stickle AJ, Mann DG. 2005. Life history and systematics of Petroneis (Bacillariophyta) with special reference to British waters. European Journal of Phycology 41: 61 87.
20. Kardolus JP, van Eck HJ, van den Berg RG. 1998. The potential of AFLPs in biosystematics: a first application in Solanum taxonomy (Solanaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution 210: 87 103.
21. King JJ. 1988. A role for taxonomy in Charophyte vegetation studies. In: Moriarty C, ed. Taxonomy - putting plants and animals in their place. Dublin: Royal Irish Academy, 163 174.
22. Kovach WL. 1999. MVSP - a multivariate statistical package for windows, version 3.1. Pentraeth: Kovach Computing Services.
23. Krause W. 1997. Charales. In: Ettl H, Gartner G, Heynig H, Mollenhauer D, eds. Susswasserflora von Mitteleuropa, Vol. 18. Jena: Fischer, 110 112.
24. Lerceteau E, Szmidt AE. 1999. Properties of AFLP markers in inheritance and genetic diversity studies of Pinus sylvestris L. Heredity 82: 252 260.
25. Mannschreck B, Fink T, Melzer A. 2002. Biosystematics of selected Chara species (Charophyta) using amplified fragment length polymorphism. Phycologia 41: 657 666.
26. Mantel N. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalised regression approach. Cancer Research 27: 209 220.
27. Martin G, Torn K, Blindow I, Schubert H, Munsterhjelm R, Henricson C. 2004. Introduction to charophytes. In: Schubert H, Blindow I, eds. Charophytes of the Baltic Sea. The Baltic Marine Biologists Publication no. 19. Ruggell, Germany: A. R. G. Gantner Verlag Kommanditgesellschaft, 3 12.
28. Proctor VW. 1975. The nature of charophyte species. Phycologia 14: 97 113.
29. Proctor VW. 1976. Genetics of charophyta. In: Lewin RA, ed. The genetics of algae. Botanical Monographs, Vol. 12. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications, 210 218.
30. van Raam JC. 1998. Handboek Kranswieren. Hilversum: Chara boek.
31. Robinson JP, Harris SA. 1999. Amplified fragment length polymorphisms and microsatellites: a phylogenetic perspective. In: Gillet EM, ed. Which DNA marker for which purpose? Chapter 12. Final Compendium of the Research Project 'Development, Optimisation and Validation of Molecular Tools for Assessment of Biodiversity in Forest Trees' in the European Union DGXII Biotechnology FWIV Research Programme 'Molecular Tools for Biodiversity'. URL http://webdoc.sub. gwdg.de/ebook/y/1999/whichmarker/index.htm [accessed on 1 September 2005].
32. Rouf Mian MA, Hopkins AA, Zwonitzer JC. 2002. Determination of genetic diversity in tall fescue with AFLP markers. Crop Science 42: 944 950.
33. Sokal RR. 1979. Testing statistical significance of geographic variation patterns. Systematic Zoology 28: 227 232.
34. Sokal RR, Thompson JD. 1987. Application of spatial autocorrelation in ecology. In: Legendre P, Legendre L, eds. Developments in numerical ecology. NATO ASI Series, Vol. G14. Berlin: Springer Verlag, 431 466.
35. Soltis PA, Gitzendanner MA. 1999. Molecular systematics and the conservation of rare species. Conservation Biology 11: 471 483.
36. Stewart NF, Church JM. 1992. Red data books of Britain & Ireland: stoneworts. Peterborough: The Joint Nature Conservation Committee.
37. Sweeny PM, Danneberger TK. 1997. RAPD markers from perennial rye grass DNA extracted from seeds. Horticultural Science 32: 1212 1215.
38. UK Biodiversity Steering Group. 1994. Biodiversity: the UK Steering Group Report - meeting the Rio challenge. URL http://www.ukbap.org.uk/library/ Tranche1.pdf [accessed on 1 September 2005].
39. Warburton ML, Hoisington DA, Xia XC, Charcosset A. 2000. Fingerprinting maize populations using a bulking strategy. In: 2000 Annual Meeting Abstracts. Agron, Abs. Madison, WI: Crop Sciences Society of America, 191 192.
40. Weising K, Nybom H, Wolff K, Kahl G. 2005. DNA fingerprinting in plants: principles, methods and applications, 2nd edn. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group.
41. Willdenow CL. 1805. Du genre nomme Chara. Memoires d'Academie Royale de Berlin 1803: 79 90.
42. Wood RD, Imahori K. 1965. A revision of the Characeae. Part I, the monograph of the Characeae. Weinheim: Verlag Von J. Cramer.
43. Yu K, Pauls KP. 1993. Rapid estimation of genetic relatedness among heterogeneous populations of alfalfa by random amplification of bulked genomic DNA samples. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 86: 788 794.