Selecting patient-based outcome measures

Athletic Therapy Today

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 12-15

  Snyder, Alison R ^a   Valovich McLeod, Tamara C ^a  

^a A T STILL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ATHLETIC TRAINER; EVALUATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, CAPACITY AND PERFORMANCE; QUALITY OF LIFE; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; TREATMENT PLANNING; VALIDITY;

EID: 36849054540     PISSN: 10787895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1123/att.12.6.12     Document Type: Review

References (20)

1. Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Patrick DL. Measuring health-related quality of life. Ann Intern Med. 1993;118:622-9.
2. Patrick DL, Deyo RA. Generic and disease-specific measures in assessing health status and quality of life. Med Care. 1989;27:S217-32.
3. Suk M, Hanson BP, Norvell DC, Helfet DL. AO Handbook: Musculoskeletal Outcomes Measures and Instruments. Davos, Switzerland: AO Publishing, Switzerland; 2005.
4. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29:602-8.
5. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. 3rd ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2003.
6. Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Kurosaka M, Neyret P, Richmond JC, Shelborne KD. Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:600-13.
7. Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assessment. 1998;1:1-69.
8. Kujala UM, Jaakkola LH, Koskinen SK, Taimela S, Hurme M, Nelimarkka O. Scoring of patellofemoral disorders. Arthroscopy. 1993;9:159-63.
9. Binkley JM, Stratford PW, Lott SA, Riddle DL. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American Orthopedic Rehabilitation Research Network. Phys Ther. 1999;79:371-83.
10. Binkley J. Measurement of functional status, progress and outcome in orthopedic clinical practice. Orthop Phys Ther Pract. 1999;11:14-21.
11. Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF. Development and validation of health-related quality of life measures for the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;95-109.
12. Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Neyret P, Richmond JC, Shelbourne KD. Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:1567-73.
13. Michener LA, Leggin BG. A review of self-report scales for the assessment of functional limitation and disability of the shoulder. J Hand Ther. 2001;14:68-76.
14. Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:171-8.
15. Guyatt GH, Kirshner B, Jaeschke R. Measuring health status: what are the necessary measurement properties? J Clin Epidemiol. 1992;45:1341-5.
16. Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research: Applications to Practice. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall Health; 2000.
17. Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH. Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials. 1989;10:407-15.
18. Schmitt JS, Di Fabio RP. Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57:1008-18.
19. Quality Metrics: Health Outcomes Solutions. Available at: http://www.qualitymetric.com. Accessed August 13, 2007.
20. Institute for Work & Health. The DASH Outcome Measure. Available at: http://www.dash.iwh.on.ca. Accessed August 13, 2007.