A dynamic model for determining the temporal distribution of environmental burden

Journal of Industrial Ecology

Volumn 11, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 39-49

  Levine, Stephen H ^a   Gloria, Thomas P ^b   Romanoff, Eliahu ^c  

^a Tufts University   (United States)

^b Life Cycle Services LLC   (United States)

^c Life Cycle Services LLC ^*

Author keywords

Dynamic modeling; Environmental assessment; Industrial ecology; Input output analysis (IOA); Sequential interindustry model (SIM); Transient events

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; DYNAMIC MODELS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; LIFE CYCLE; TRANSIENT ANALYSIS;

INDUSTRIAL ECOLOGY; INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS (IOA); SEQUENTIAL INTERINDUSTRY MODEL (SIM); TRANSIENT EVENTS;

ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; INPUT-OUTPUT ANALYSIS; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; MODELING; TEMPORAL DISTRIBUTION;

EID: 36849054305     PISSN: 10881980     EISSN: 15309290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/jiec.2007.1244     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Beltratti, A., G. Chichilnisky, and G. Heal. 1995. Sustainable growth and the Green Golden Rule. In The economics of sustainable development, edited by I. Goldin and L. A. Winters. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2. Clark, C. W. 1976. Mathematical bioeconomics. New York: Wiley.
3. Costanza, R. and H. E. Daly. 1987. Toward an ecological economics. Ecological Modelling 38: 1-7.
4. Dasgupta, P. 1995. Optimal development and the idea of net national product. In The economics of sustainable development, edited by I. Goldin and L. A. Winters. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Davis, M. L. and S. J. Masten. 2004. Principles of environmental engineering and science. Boston: McGraw Hill.
6. DOE (Department of Energy). 2002a. National hydrogen energy roadmap. Washington, DC: Department of Energy. 〈http://www1.eere. energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/pdfs/nationalh2 roadmap.pdf〉. Accessed September 2007.
7. DOE. 2002b. A national vision of America's transition to a hydrogen economy - To 2030 and beyond. Washington, DC: Department of Energy. 〈http://www1.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/pdfs/vision doc.pdf〉. Accessed September 2007.
8. DOE. 2004. Hydrogen posture plan. Washington, DC: Department of Energy. 〈http://www1.eere.energy.gov/hydrogenandfuelcells/pdfs/ hydrogenposture plan.pdf〉. Accessed September 2007.
9. 2 capture and sequestration. In The hydrogen energy transition, edited by D. Sperling and J. S. Cannon. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
10. Duchin, F. 1998. Structural economics. Washington, DC: Island Press.
11. Duchin, F. and D. Szyld. 1985. A dynamic input-output model with assured positive output. Metroeconomica 37(3): 269-282.
12. Ebeling, C. E. 1997. An introduction to reliability and maintainability engineering. New York: McGraw-Hill.
13. Field, F., R. Kirchain, and J. Clark. 2000. Lifecycle assessment and temporal distributions of emissions. Journal of Industrial Ecology 4(2): 71-91.
14. Gilbert, N. and K. G. Troitzsch. 1999. Simulation for the social scientist. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
15. Harris, J. M. 1995. Theoretical frameworks and techniques. In A survey of ecological economics, edited by R. Krishnan, J. M. Harris, and N. R. Goodwin. Wahington, DC: Island Press.
16. Heiskanen, E. 2002. The institutional logic of life cycle thinking. Journal of Cleaner Production 10(5): 427-437.
17. Hellweg, S., T. B. Hofstetter, and K. Hungerbühler. 2003. Discounting and the environment. International Journal of The Life Cycle Assessment 8(1): 8-18.
18. Hemond, H. F. and E. J. Fechner. 1994. Chemical fate and transport in the environment. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
19. Hendrickson, C., A. Horvath, S. Joshi, and L. Lave. 1998. Economic input-output models for environmental life-cycle assessment. Environmental Science and Technology A 32(7): 184-191.