Validity in assessing self-regulated learning: A comment on Perry & Winne

Educational Psychology Review

Volumn 18, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 229-232

  Nolen, Susan Bobbitt ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Context; Learning strategies; Mesurement; Self regulated learning; Validity

Indexed keywords

EID: 36849044165     PISSN: 1040726X     EISSN: 1573336X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10648-006-9016-1     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Ainley, M., Hidi, S., & Berndorff, D. (2002). Interest, learning, and the psychological processes that mediate their relationship. Journal of Educational Pychology, 94(3), 545-561.
2. Boekaerts, M. (2002). The on-line motivation questionnaire: A self-report instrument to assess students' context sensitivity. In P. R. Pintrich & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (pp. 77-120). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
3. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1980). Verbal reports as data. Psychological Review, 87(3), 215-251.
4. Garner, R., Gillingham, M. G., & White, C. (1989). Effects of "seductive details" on macroprocessing and microprocessing in adults and children. Cognition & Instruction, 6(1), 41-57.
5. Nolen, S. B. (1988). Reasons for studying: Motivational orientations and study strategies. Cognition & Instruction, 5(4), 269-287.
6. Nolen, S. B. (1995). Effects of a visible author in statistical texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(1), 47-65.