Fruit and vegetable distribution program versus a multicomponent program to increase fruit and vegetable consumption: Which should be recommended for implementation?: Research article

Journal of School Health

Volumn 77, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 679-686

  Reinaerts, Evelien B M ^a   De Nooijer, Jascha ^a   De Vries, Nanne K ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Diet; Evaluation; Nutrition; School health instruction

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHILD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CURRICULUM; EVALUATION; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FRUIT; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICE; UNIVERSITY; VEGETABLE;

ADOLESCENT; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; CURRICULUM; FACULTY; FOOD HABITS; FRUIT; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; SCHOOL HEALTH SERVICES; VEGETABLES;

EID: 36849033432     PISSN: 00224391     EISSN: 17461561     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2007.00251.x     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G, Gottlieb NH. Intervention Mapping. Designing Theory and Evidence Based Health Promotion Programs. New York, NY : Mc Graw Hill 2001.
2. Perez-Rodrigo C, Wind M, Hildonen C, et al. The pro children intervention: applying the Intervention mapping protocol to develop a school-based fruit and vegetable promotion programme. Ann Nutr Metab. 2005 49 : 267 277.
3. Weber Cullen K, Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G. Intervention mapping: use of theory and data in the development of a fruit and vegetable nutrition program for girl scouts. J Nutr Educ. 1998 30 : 188 195.
4. Reinaerts EBM, De Nooijer J, Candel M, De Vries NK. Increasing children's fruit and vegetable consumption: distribution or multi-component programs? Public Health Nutr. 2007 10 (9): 939 947.
5. Green LW, Kreuter MW. Health Promotion Planning: An Educational and Ecological Approach. 3rd ed. Mountain View, Calif : Mayfield Publishing Co 1999.
6. Potvin L, Haddad S, Frohlich KL. Beyond process and outcome evaluation: a comprehensive approach for evaluating health promotion programmes. In : Rootman I, Goodstadt M, Hyndman B, et al., eds. Evaluation in Health Promotion: Principles and Perspectives. Copenhagen, Denmark : WHO Regional Publications 2001. European Series no.92.
7. Rossi PH, Freeman HE, Lipsey MW. Evaluation: A Systematic Approach. 6th ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif : Sage Publications 1999.
8. Klepp K-I, Pérez-Rodrigo C, de Bourdeaudhuij I, et al. Promoting fruit and vegetable consumption among European schoolchildren: rationale, conceptualization and design of the pro children project. Ann Nutr Metab. 2005 49 : 212 220.
9. Rogers EM. Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. New York, NY : Free Press 2003.
10. Rogers EM. Diffusion of preventive innovations. Addict Behav. 2002 27 : 989 993.
11. Zaltman G, Duncan R. Strategies for Planned Change. New York, NY : Wiley 1977.
12. Euridyce. Informatiedossier over het Nederlandse onderwijssysteem [Information file on the Dutch education system]. 2005. Available at : http://www.minocw.nl/documenten/eurydice_nl.pdf. Accessed March 23, 2005.
13. Fleuren M, Wiefferink K, Paulussen T. Determinants of innovation within health care organizations: literature review and Delphi study. Int J for Qual Health Care. 2004 16 (2 107 123.
14. Paulussen TGW. Adoption and Implementation of AIDS Education in Dutch Secondary Schools [PhD thesis]. Maastricht, The Netherlands : University of Maastricht 1994.
15. Ajzen I. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Org Behav Hum Decis Proc. 1991 50 : 179 211.
16. Paulussen T, Kok G, Schaalma H. Antecedents to adoption of classroom-based AIDS education in secondary schools. Health Educ Res. 1994 9 (4 485 496.
17. Ajzen I. Constructing an TpB questionnaire: conceptual and methodological considerations. Available at : http://www.ru.nl/socgeo/n/onderwijs/ruimgedrag/ tpb.measurement.pdf. Accessed February 18, 2005.
18. Baranowski T, Stables G. Process evaluation of the 5-a-day projects. Health Educ Behav. 2000 27 (2 157 166.
19. Davis A, Baranowski T, Resnicow K, et al. Gimme 5 fruit and vegetables for fun and health: process evaluation. Health Educ Behav. 2000 27 (2 167 176.
20. Perry C, Bishop D, Taylor G, et al. Changing fruit and vegetable consumption among children: the 5-a-day Power Plus Program in St. Paul, Minnesota. Am J Public Health. 1998 88 (4 603 609.
21. McKinley RK, Manku-Scott T, Hastings AM, French DP, Baker R. Reliability and validity of a new measure of patient satisfaction with out of hours primary medical care in the United Kingdom: development of a patient questionnaire. BMJ. 1997 314 : 193.
22. Peterson RA. A meta-analysis of Cronbach's coefficient alpha. J Consum Res. 1994 21 (2 381 391.
23. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistics notes: Cronbach's alpha. BMJ. 1997 314 : 572.
24. Reubsaet A, Reinaerts EBM, Brug J, van Hooff JP, van den Borne HW. Process evaluation of a school-based education program about organ donation and registration, and the intention for continuance. Health Educ Res. 2004 19 (6 720 729.
25. Reynolds K, Franklin F, Leviton LC, et al. Methods, results, and lessons learned from process evaluation of the High 5 school-based nutrition intervention. Health Educ Behav. 2000 27 (2 177 186.
26. Auld GW, Romaniello C, Heimendinger J, Hambidge C, Hambidge M. Outcomes from a school-based nutrition education program alternating special resource teachers and classroom teachers. J Sch Health. 1999 69 (10 403 408.
27. Story M, Warren-Mays R, Bishop DB, et al. 5-a-day Power Plus: evaluation of a multicomponent elementary school program to increase fruit and vegetable consumption. Health Educ Behav. 2000 27 (2 187 200.