Direct intercept guidance using differential geometry concepts

IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 899-919

  White, Brian A ^a   Zbikowski, Rafał ^a   Tsourdos, Antonios ^a  

^a CRANFIELD UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR NAVIGATION; COMPUTATIONAL GEOMETRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; KINEMATICS; LYAPUNOV METHODS; MANEUVERABILITY;

DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY; INTERCEPTOR MISSILE; MANOEUVRING TARGETS; NONMANOEUVRING TARGETS;

MISSILES;

EID: 36849015382     PISSN: 00189251     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TAES.2007.4383582     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Lin, C.-F. Modern Navigation Guidance and Control Processing. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, 1991.
2. Salmond, D. J. Foundations of modern missile guidance. Journal of Defence Science, 1, 2 (1996), 171-180.
3. Zarchan, P. Tactical and Strategic Missile Guidance. Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics, vol. 124, AIAA, 1990.
4. Guelman, M. A qualitive study of proportional navigation. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, AES-7 (July 1971), 637-643.
5. Gutman, S. On optimal guidance for homing missiles. AIAA Journal of Guidance and Control, 3, 4 (1979), 296-300.
6. Cloutier, J. R., Evers, J. H., and Feeley, J. J. Assessment of air-to-air missile guidance and control technology. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 9, 6 (1989), 27-34.
7. Balakrishnan, S. N., Stansbery, D. T., Evers, J. H., and Cloutier, J. R. Analytical guidance laws and integrated guidance/autopilot for homing missiles. In IEEE International Conference on Control Applications 1993, 27-32.
8. Shneydor, N. A. Missile Guidance and Pursuit. Kinematics, Dynamics and Control. Chichester, UK: Horwood Publishing, 1998.
9. Ben-Asher, J. Z., and Yaesh, I. Advances in Missile Guidance Theory New York: AIAA, 1998.
10. Lipschutz, M. M. Differential Geometry (Schaum's Outline Series). New York: McGraw-Hill, 1969.
11. O'Neill, B. Elementary Differential Geometry (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1997.
12. Adler, F. P. Missile guidance by three dimensional proportional navigation. Journal of Applied Physics, 27 (1956), 500-507.
13. O'Neill, B. Elementary Differential Geometry (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1997.
14. Gray, A. Modern Differential Geometry of Curves and Surfaces with Mathematica (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 1998.
15. Dijksman, E. A. Motion Geometry of Mechanisms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1976.
16. Chiou, Y. C., and Kuo, C. Y. Geometric approach to three dimensional missile guidance problem. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 21, 2 (1998), 335-341.
17. Kuo, C. Y., and Chiou, Y. C. Geometric analysis of missile guidance command. IEE Proceedings: Control Theory and Applications, 147(2):205-211, 2000.
18. Kuo, C. Y., Soetanto, D., and Chiou, Y. C. Geometric analysis of flight control command for tactical missile guidance. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 9, 2 (2001), 234-243.
19. Serakos, D., and Lin, C.-F. Linearized kappa guidance. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics, 18, 5 (1995), 975-980.
20. Serakos, D., and Lin, C.-F. Three dimensional mid-course guidance state equations. In Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference, 1999, vol. 6, 3738-3742.
21. Cherry, G. W. A general explicit, optimizing guidance law for rocket-propellant spacecraft. In AIAA/ION Astrodynamics, Guidance and Control Conference, 1964; paper 64-638.
22. Aroff, O., Zbikowski, R., Tsourdos, A., and White, B. A. Differential geometric guidance based on the involute of the target's trajectory. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 28, 5 (2005), 990-996.