Probabilistic matching and resemblance evaluation of shapes in trademark images

Proceedings of the 6th ACM International Conference on Image and Video Retrieval, CIVR 2007

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 533-540

  Alt, Helmut ^a   Scharf, Ludmila ^a   Scholz, Sven ^a  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Probabilistic algorithms; Shape matching; Shape similarity; Trademark image retrieval

Indexed keywords

SHAPE MATCHING; SHAPE SIMILARITY; TRADEMARK IMAGE RETRIEVAL; TRANSFORMATION SPACE;

ALGORITHMS; DATABASE SYSTEMS; PATTERN MATCHING; PROBABILISTIC LOGICS;

TRADEMARKS;

EID: 36849014897     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1282280.1282357     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. P. K. Agarwal and M. Sharir. Davenport-Schinzel sequences and their geometric applications. In J.-R. Sack and J. Urrutia, editors, Handbook of Computational Geometry, pages 1-47. Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 2000.
2. A. S. Aguado, E. Montiel, and M. S. Nixon. Invariant characterisation of the hough transform for pose estimation of arbitrary shapes. Pattern Recognition, 35:1083-1097, 2002.
3. H. Alt, L. Scharf, and S. Scholz. Probabilistic matching of sets of polygonal curves. In Proceedings of the 22nd European Workshop on Computational Geometry (EWCG), pages 107-110, Delphi, Greece, March 2006.
4. E. Attalla and P. Siy. Robust shape similarity retrieval based on contour segmentation polygonal multiresolution and elastic matching. Pattern Recognition, 38(12):2229-2241, December 2005.
5. F. Attneave. Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychological Review, 61(3):183-193, 1954.
6. K. L. Clarkson. Nearest-neighbor searching and metric space dimensions. In G. Shakhnarovich, T. Darrell, and P. Indyk, editors, Nearest-Neighbor Methods for Learning and Vision: Theory and Practice, pages 15-59. MIT Press, 2006.
7. D. Douglas and T. Peuker. Algorithms for the reduction of the number of points required to represent a digitised line or its caricature. In The Canadian Cartographer, volume 10, pages 112-122, 1973.
8. J. P. Eakins, J. M. Boardman, and M. E. Graham. Similarity retrieval of trademark images. IEEE MultiMedia, 5(2):53-63, 1998.
9. H. Jiang, C.-W. Ngo, and H.-K. Tan. Gestalt-based feature similarity measure in trademark database. Pattern Recognition, 39(5):988-1001, 2006.
10. R. C. B. Martin A. Fischler. Random sample consensus: A paradigm for model fitting with applications to image analysis and automated cartography. Communications of the ACM, 24:381-395, 1981.
11. S. Moss and E. R. Hancock. Pose clustering with density estimation and structural constraints. In IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, volume 2, pages 2085-2091, 1999.
12. C. F. Olson. Efficient pose clustering using a randomized algorithm. Int. J. Comput. Vision, 23(2):131-147, 1997.
13. A. Pinz, M. Prantl, and H. Ganster. A robust affine matching algorithm using an exponentially decreasing distance function. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 1(8):614-631, 1995.
14. G. Stockman. Object recognition and localization via pose clustering. Computer Vision, Graphics, and Image Processing, 40:361-387, 1987.
15. R. C. Veltkamp. Multimedia retrieval algorithmics. In SOFSEM2007: Theory and Practice of Computer Science, LNCS 4362, pages 138-154, 2007.
16. H. J. Wolfson and I. Rigoutsos. Geometric hashing: An overview. IEEE Computational Science and Engineering, 04(4):10-21, 1997.