Improved quantitative assessment of left ventricular volumes using TGrE approach after application of extracellular contrast agent at 3 Tesla

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

Volumn 9, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 845-853

  Hamdan, Ashraf ^a   Kelle, Sebastian ^a   Schnackenburg, Bernhard ^b   Fleck, Eckart ^a   Nagel, Eike ^a  

^a DEUTSCHES HERZZENTRUM BERLIN   (Germany)

^b PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

3 Tesla; Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance; Contrast Agent; Left Ventricular Function

Indexed keywords

GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEART FUNCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE EJECTION FRACTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE FUNCTION; HEART LEFT VENTRICLE VOLUME; HEART MUSCLE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE;

ADULT; AGED; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STROKE VOLUME; VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION, LEFT;

EID: 36849007549     PISSN: 10976647     EISSN: 1532429X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10976640701693600     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Sanz G, Castaner A, Betriu A, Magrina J, Roig E, Coll S, Pare JC, Navarro-Lopez F. Determinants of prognosis in survivors of myocardial infarction: a prospective clinical angiographic study. N Engl J Med 1982;306:1065-1070.
2. Pattynama PM, Lamb HJ, van der Velde EA, van der Wall EE, de Roos A. Left ventricular measurements with cine and spin-echo MR imaging: a study of reproducibility with variance component analysis. Radiology 1993;187(1):261-8.
3. Pennell DJ, Sechtem UP, Higgins CB, Manning WJ, Pohost GM, Rademakers FE, van Rossum AC, Shaw LJ, Yucel EK. Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): Consensus Panel report. Eur Heart J 2004;25(21):1940-1965.
4. Barkhausen J, Ruehm SG, Goyen M, Buck T, Laub G, Debatin JF MR evaluation of ventricular function: true fast imaging with steady-state precession versus fast low-angle shot cine MR imaging: feasibility study. Radiology 2001;219:264-269.
5. Moon JC, Lorenz CH, Francis JM, Smith GC, Pennell DJ.Breathhold FLASH and FISP cardiovascular MR imaging: left ventricular volume differences and reproducibility. Radiology 2002;223:789-797.
6. Michaely HJ, Nael K, Schoenberg SO, Laub G, Reiser MF, Finn JP, Ruehm SG Analysis of cardiac function-comparison between 1.5 Tesla and 3.0 Tesla cardiac cine magnetic resonance imaging: preliminary experience. Invest Radiol 2006;41(2):133-140.
7. Wintersperger BJ, Bauner K, Reeder SB, Friedrich D, Dietrich O, Sprung KC, Picciolo M, Nikolaou K, Reiser MF, Schoenberg SO. Cardiac steady-state free precession CINE magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 tesla: impact of parallel imaging acceleration on volumetric accuracy and signal parameters. Invest Radiol 2006;41(2):141-147.
8. Thiele H, Nagel E, Paetsch I, Schnackenburg B, Bornstedt A, Kouwenhoven M, Wahl A, Schuler G, Fleck E. Functional cardiac MR imaging with steady-state free precession (SSFP) significantly improves endocardial border delineation without contrast agents. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001;14(4):362-367.
9. Pennell DJ, Underwood SR, Longmore DB. Improved cine MR imaging of left ventricular wall motion with gadopentetate dimeglumine. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3(1):13-19.
10. Klumpp B, Fenchel M, Hoevelborn T, Helber U, Scheule A, Claussen C, Miller S. Assessment of myocardial viability using delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 Tesla. Invest Radiol 2006;41(9):661-667.
11. Matsumura K, Nakase E, Haiyama T, Takeo K, Shimizu K, Yamasaki K, Kohno K. Determination of cardiac ejection fraction and left ventricular volume: contrast-enhanced ultrafast cine MR imaging vs IV digital subtraction ventriculography. AJRAmJ Roentgenol 1993 May;160(5):979-985.
12. Fischer SE, Wickline SA, Lorenz CH. Novel real-time R-wave detection alogarithm based on the vectorcardiogram for accurate gated magnetic resonance acquisitions. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:361-370.
13. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1(8476):307-310.
14. Marcus JT, Kuijer JPA, Gotte RM. Left ventricular mass measured by magnetic resonance imaging: effect of endocardial trabeculae on the observed wall thickness (abstr). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2000; 2:301-302.
15. Ibrahim T, Weniger M, Schwaiger M. Effect of papillary muscles and trabeculae on left ventricular parameters in cine-magnetic resonance images (MRI) (abstr). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 1999;1:319.
16. Araoz PA, Glockner JF, McGee KP, Potter DD Jr, Valeti VU, Stanley DW, Christian TF. 3 Tesla MR imaging provides improved contrast in first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging over a range of gadolinium doses. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2005;7(3):559-564.