Responding and failing to respond to both hypnosis and a kinesthetic illusion, Chevreul's pendulum

International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 83-98

  Karlin, Robert A ^a   Hill, Austin ^b   Messer, Stanley ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Rutgers University ^*

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; HYPNOSIS; HYPNOTIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; MALE; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PROPRIOCEPTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; VISUAL ILLUSION;

EID: 36849001285     PISSN: 00207144     EISSN: 17445183     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00207140701673118     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Anderson, J. (1977). Defensive maneuvers in two incidents involving the Chevreul pendulum: A clinical note. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 25, 4-6.
2. Blum, G. (1950). The Blacky Pictures. New York: Psychological Corporation.
3. Blum, G., & Hunt, H. (1952). The validity of the Blacky pictures. Psychological Bulletin, 49, 238-250.
4. Chevreul, M. (1833). Lettre a M. Ampere sur une class particulaires [Letter to Mr. Ampere concerning an exceptional subject]. Revue des Deux Mondes, 2, 2nd series, 258-266.
5. Chevreul, M. (1854). De la baquette divinatoire, du pendulue explorateur, des tables tournates, au point de vue de l'histoire de la critique et de la methode experimentale [Of the divining rod, the prospecting pendulum and table turning, from the point of view of the history of criticism and of the experimental method]. Paris: Mallett-Bachelier.
6. Coe, W., & Ryken, K. (1979). Hypnosis and risks to human subjects. American Psychologist, 34, 673-681.
7. Easton, R., & Shor, R. E. (1973). Imagery and the Chevreul Pendulum illusion. Proceedings, 81st Annual Convention, American Psychological Association, 1087-1088.
8. Easton, R., & Shor, R. E. (1975). Information processing analysis of the Chevreul Pendulum illusion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 231-236.
9. Easton, R., & Shor, R. E. (1977). Augmented and delayed feedback in the Chevreul Pendulum illusion. Journal of General Psychology, 97, 1676-1677.
10. Eysenck, H., & Furneaux, W. (1945). Primary and secondary suggestibility: An experimental and statistical study. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35, 485-503.
11. Goldstein, Y. (1981). The effect of demonstrating to a subject that she is in a hypnotic trance as a variable in hypnotic interventions with obese women. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, 29, 15-23.
12. Haverkamp, B. (1993). Confirmatory bias in hypothesis testing for client-identified and counselor self-generated hypotheses. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 40, 303-315.
13. Karlin, R. A. (1979). Hypnotizability and attention. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 88, 92-95.
14. Karlin, R. A., & McKeon, P. (1976). The use of hypnosis in behavior therapy. In A. Lazarus (Ed.), Multimodal therapy (pp. 133-148). New York: Springer.
15. Kihlstrom, J. F., & Evans, F. (1976). Recovery of memory after posthypnotic amnesia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 85, 564-569.
16. Lynn, S. J., & Sivec, H. (1992). The hypnotizable subject as creative problem-solving agent. In E. Fromm & M. R. Nash (Eds.), Contemporary hypnosis research (pp. 292-333). New York: Guilford.
17. Orne, M. T., & Dinges, D. (1989). Hypnosis. In H. Kaplan and B. Sudock (Eds.), Comprehensive textbook of psychiatry (5th ed., pp. 1501-1516). Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
18. Shor, R. E. (1961). Personal Experiences Questionnaire: Form HP: College Students. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Shor, R. E., & Orne, E. C. (1962). Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility: Form A. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
20. Shor, R. E., Orne, M. T., & O'Connell, D. (1962). Validation and cross-validation of a scale of self-reported personal experiences which predict hypnotizability. Journal of Psychology, 53, 55-75.
21. Singer, J. (2006). Imagery in Psychotherapy. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
22. Weitzenhoffer, A. M., & Hilgard, E. R. (1959). Stanford Hypnotic Susceptibility Scale: Forms A and B. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.