Diagnostic performance of stereotactic large core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast lesions in routine clinical practice

International Journal of Cancer

Volumn 122, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 468-471

  Peters, Nicky ^a,b   Hoorntje, Lidewij ^a   Mali, Willem ^a   Rinkes, Inne Borel ^a   Peeters, Petra ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b NONE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Large core needle biopsy; Nonpalpable

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BENIGN TUMOR; BREAST CARCINOMA; BREAST DUCT; BREAST INJURY; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER RISK; CARCINOMA IN SITU; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEEDLE BIOPSY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEREOTAXIS;

AGED; ANTICOAGULANTS; BIOPSY; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; BREAST NEOPLASMS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; RISK; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STEREOTAXIC TECHNIQUES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 36848999489     PISSN: 00207136     EISSN: 10970215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.23078     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Verkooijen HM. Diagnostic accuracy of stereotactic large-core needle biopsy for nonpalpable breast disease: results of a multicenter prospective study with 95% surgical confirmation. Int J Cancer 2002;99:853-9.
2. Jackman RJ, Nowels KW, Rodriguez-Soto J, Marzoni FA, Jr, Finkelstein SI, Shepard MJ. Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up. Radiology 1999;210:799-805.
3. Brem RF, Baum J, Lechner M, Kaplan S, Souders S, Naul LG, Hoffmeister J. Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multi-institutional trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:687-93.
4. Buijs-van der WT, Verkooijen HM, Pijnappel RM, Klinkenbijl JH, Borel Rinkes I, Peeters PH, Buskens E. Cost comparison between stereotactic large-core-needle biopsy versus surgical excision biopsy in The Netherlands. Eur J Cancer 2001;37:1736-45.
5. Verkooijen HM, Buskens E, Peeters PH, Borel Rinkes I, de Koning HJ, van Vroonhoven TJ. Diagnosing non-palpable breast disease: short-term impact on quality of life of large-core needle biopsy versus open breast biopsy. Surg Oncol 2002;10:177-81.
6. National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening (LETB). Ninth evaluation report. Rotterdam: National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening (LETB), 2001.
7. Smith-Bindman R, Chu PW, Miglioretti DL, Sickles EA, Blanks R, Ballard-Barbash R, Bobo JK, Lee NC, Wallis MG, Patnick J, Kerlikowske K. Comparison of screening mammography in the United States and the United kingdom. JAMA 2003;290:2129-37.
8. Hoorntje LE, Peeters PH, Borel Rinkes I, Verkooijen HM, Pijnappel RM, Mali WP. Stereotactic large core needle biopsy for all nonpalpable breast lesions? Breast Cancer Res Treat 2002;73:177-82.
9. Dillon MF, Hill AD, Quinn CM, O'Doherty A, McDermott EW, O'Higgins N. The accuracy of ultrasound, stereotactic, and clinical core biopsies in the diagnosis of breast cancer, with an analysis of false-negative cases. Ann Surg 2005;242:701-7.
10. Fajardo LL, Pisano ED, Caudry DJ, Gatsonis CA, Berg WA, Connolly J, Schnitt S, Page DL, McNeil BJ. Stereotactic and sonographic large-core biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: results of the Radiologic Diagnostic Oncology Group V study. Acad Radiol 2004;11:293-308.
11. Parker SH, Jobe WE, Dennis MA, Stavros AT, Johnson KK, Yakes WF, Truell JE, Price JG, Kortz AB, Clark DG. US-guided automated large-core breast biopsy. Radiology 1993;187:507-11.