메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 79, Issue 12, 1983, Pages 6387-6409

Collective diffusion, nucleation, and spinodal decomposition in polymer mixtures

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords


EID: 36749110359     PISSN: 00219606     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1063/1.445747     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (736)

References (104)
  • 2
    • 84952297612 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • see also Refs. 2‐4.
  • 6
    • 0141965491 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A recent excellent review of the kinetics of unmixing has been given by J. D. Gunton, M. Sam Miguel, and P. S. Sahni, in, (Academic, New York, and London, 1983), Vol. 9. Earlier reviews of spinodal decomposition are found in Refs. 6-13 and nucleation in Refs. 14-18.edited by C. Domb and J. L. Lebowitz
    • Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena
  • 15
    • 33645710885 scopus 로고
    • edited by A. C. Zettlemoyer.(Marcel Dekker, New York)
    • (1969) Nucleation
  • 26
    • 0004180387 scopus 로고
    • (Plenum, New York, );edited by D. Klempner and K. Frisch
    • (1977) Polymer Alloys
  • 61
    • 84952297409 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • see also Ref. 55 below.
  • 62
    • 85034724404 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • References 11, 12, 21, and 22 miss a factor of 2 which arises from the differentiation of the [formula omitted] term.
  • 65
    • 85034726624 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • This result is already quoted in Eq. (IV. 19) of Ref. 25.
  • 71
    • 85034729289 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • This discrepancy between our result and Eq. (1.4) of de Genne is probably due to the fact that in Eq. (3.3) a constant 1/36 should rather be 1/18.
  • 73
    • 85034727472 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In Ref. 2, a result analogus to Eq. (3.34) was obtained by a rather different method, Eq. (2.35). Note that a factor 2 in the argument of the exponential there was erroneously omitted.
  • 77
    • 85034728230 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • After Eq. (3.6) of Ref. 22, it is stated that for [formula omitted] Eq. (3.2) is recovered, which would imply [formula omitted] rather than [formula omitted] Apart from this discrepancy the validty of the derivation of Eq. (3.6) seems doubtful to us, as again it was tried to determine an effective initial slope of [formula omitted] in the regime [formula omitted]
  • 87
    • 84952297388 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • At this point, we disregard the precise prefector in Eq. (4, 4) which should exhibit both the “” and a factor representing critical slowing down (Ref. 16).
    • Zeldovich factor
  • 95
    • 84952297389 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • In transforming from [formula omitted] to [formula omitted] linear terms in φ are eliminated by a Legendre transformation, Equation (2.2) then reduces to Eq. (6.3) if [formula omitted] and [formula omitted] The θ point occurs in this mean‐field theory at [formula omitted] By [formula omitted] we now denote the chemical potential per monomer (rather then a chemical potential difference).


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.