-
2
-
-
84952297612
-
-
see also Refs. 2‐4.
-
-
-
-
6
-
-
0141965491
-
-
A recent excellent review of the kinetics of unmixing has been given by J. D. Gunton, M. Sam Miguel, and P. S. Sahni, in, (Academic, New York, and London, 1983), Vol. 9. Earlier reviews of spinodal decomposition are found in Refs. 6-13 and nucleation in Refs. 14-18.edited by C. Domb and J. L. Lebowitz
-
Phase Transitions and Critical Phenomena
-
-
-
15
-
-
33645710885
-
-
edited by A. C. Zettlemoyer.(Marcel Dekker, New York)
-
(1969)
Nucleation
-
-
-
26
-
-
0004180387
-
-
(Plenum, New York, );edited by D. Klempner and K. Frisch
-
(1977)
Polymer Alloys
-
-
-
61
-
-
84952297409
-
-
see also Ref. 55 below.
-
-
-
-
62
-
-
85034724404
-
-
References 11, 12, 21, and 22 miss a factor of 2 which arises from the differentiation of the [formula omitted] term.
-
-
-
-
65
-
-
85034726624
-
-
This result is already quoted in Eq. (IV. 19) of Ref. 25.
-
-
-
-
71
-
-
85034729289
-
-
This discrepancy between our result and Eq. (1.4) of de Genne is probably due to the fact that in Eq. (3.3) a constant 1/36 should rather be 1/18.
-
-
-
-
73
-
-
85034727472
-
-
In Ref. 2, a result analogus to Eq. (3.34) was obtained by a rather different method, Eq. (2.35). Note that a factor 2 in the argument of the exponential there was erroneously omitted.
-
-
-
-
77
-
-
85034728230
-
-
After Eq. (3.6) of Ref. 22, it is stated that for [formula omitted] Eq. (3.2) is recovered, which would imply [formula omitted] rather than [formula omitted] Apart from this discrepancy the validty of the derivation of Eq. (3.6) seems doubtful to us, as again it was tried to determine an effective initial slope of [formula omitted] in the regime [formula omitted]
-
-
-
-
87
-
-
84952297388
-
-
At this point, we disregard the precise prefector in Eq. (4, 4) which should exhibit both the “” and a factor representing critical slowing down (Ref. 16).
-
Zeldovich factor
-
-
-
95
-
-
84952297389
-
-
In transforming from [formula omitted] to [formula omitted] linear terms in φ are eliminated by a Legendre transformation, Equation (2.2) then reduces to Eq. (6.3) if [formula omitted] and [formula omitted] The θ point occurs in this mean‐field theory at [formula omitted] By [formula omitted] we now denote the chemical potential per monomer (rather then a chemical potential difference).
-
-
-
|