On the estimation of hysteretic energy demands for SDOF systems

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 36, Issue 15, 2007, Pages 2365-2382

  Arroyo, Danny ^a,b   Ordaz, Mario ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA METROPOLITANA AZCAPOTZALCO   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Constant ductility spectra; Hysteretic energy; Stiffness degrading system; Strong ground motion duration

Indexed keywords

ACCELERATION; DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); DUCTILITY; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; ELASTOPLASTICITY; HYSTERESIS; STIFFNESS;

CONSTANT DUCTILITY SPECTRA; HYSTERETIC ENERGY; STIFFNESS DEGRADING SYSTEM; STRONG GROUND MOTION DURATION;

EARTHQUAKES;

DUCTILITY; ELASTOPLASTICITY; ESTIMATION METHOD; GROUND MOTION; HYSTERESIS; STIFFNESS;

EID: 36749094630     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.736     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Housner GW. Limit design of structures to resist earthquakes. Proceedings of the 1st World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. EERI: Berkeley, CA, 1956.
2. Iemura H. Earthquake failure criteria of deteriorating hysteretic structures. Seventh World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, vol. 5, Istanbul, Turkey, 1980; 81-88.
3. Zarah T, Hall W. Earthquake energy absorption in SDOF systems. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 1984; 110(8):1757-1772.
4. Park YJ, Ang AH, Wen YK. Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 1985; 111(4):722-739.
5. Park YJ, Ang AH. Seismic damage analysis of reinforced concrete buildings. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 1985; 111(4):740-757.
6. Uang CM, Bertero VV. Evaluation of seismic energy in structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1990; 19:77-90.
7. Fajfar P. Equivalent ductility factors taking into account low-cycle fatigue. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1992; 21:837-848.
8. Cosenza E, Manfredi G, Ramasco R. The use of damage functionals in earthquake engineering: a comparison between different methods. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1993; 22:868-885.
9. Rodriguez M. A measure of the capacity of earthquake ground motions to damage structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1994; 23:627-643.
10. Fajfar P, Vidic T. Consistent inelastic design spectra: hysteretic and input energy. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1994; 23:523-537.
11. Teran A. Performance-based earthquake-resistant design of framed buildings using energy concepts. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley, 1996.
12. Akiyama H. Earthquake-resistant Design Method for Buildings Based on Energy Balance. Gihodo Shuppan Co.: Japan, 1999.
13. Manfredi G. Evaluation of seismic energy demand. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2001; 30:485-499.
14. Riddell R, Garcia JE. Hysteretic energy spectrum and damage control. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2001; 30:1791-1816.
15. Kunnath SK, Chai YH. Cumulative damage-based inelastic cyclic demand spectrum. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2004; 33:499-520. DOI: 10.1002/eqe.363
16. Trifunac MD, Brady AG. A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 1975; 65(3):581-626.
17. Kunnath SK, Reinhorn AM, Park YJ. Analytical modeling of inelastic seismic response of R/C structures. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 1990; 116(4):996-1017.
18. Takeda T, Sozen MA. Reinforced concrete response to simulated earthquakes. ASCE Journal of Structural Engineering 1970; 96:2557-2573.