Can you shrinkwrap a cow? Protections available for the intellectual property of the animal breeding industry

Animal Genetics

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 647-654

  Ogden, E R ^a   Weigel, K ^b  

^a Murphy Desmond SC   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal breeding industry; Contractual licences; Field of use; Genetic innovations; Intellectual property; Price discrimination

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ARTICLE; BREEDING; CATTLE; LEGAL ASPECT; LICENSING; PATENT; PUBLISHING;

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMALS; BREEDING; CATTLE; COPYRIGHT; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; LICENSURE; PATENTS AS TOPIC;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 36749088160     PISSN: 02689146     EISSN: 13652052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2052.2007.01656.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. 1-2 Melville B. Nimmer, Nimmer on Copyright (1976).
2. 15 U.S.C. § 1051(a).
3. 17 U.S.C. § 102(b).
4. 35 U.S.C. § 101.
5. 35 U.S.C. § 154(a)(2).
6. 37 C.F.R. § 202.1(a).
7. Agreement For Requesting Stocks From the Mutant Mouse Regional Resource Centers, Mutant Mouse Regional Resource Centers, Rev. August 2006.
8. Ariz. Cartridge Remanufacturers Ass'n v. Lexmark Int'l, Inc., 421 F.3d 981 (9th Cir. 2005).
9. B. Braun Medical, Inc. v. Abbott Laboratories, 124 F.3d 1419 (Fed. Cir. 1997).
10. Bayer AG v. Housey Pharms., Inc., 228 F. Supp. 2d 467 (D. Del. 2002).
11. Blunt P. (1998) Note: selective breeding and the patenting of living organisms, 48 Syracuse Law Review 1365 90.
12. Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc., 489 U.S. 141, 109 S.Ct. 971 (1989).
13. Diamond v. Chakrabarty, 447 U.S. 303 (1980).
14. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co., Inc., 499 U.S. 340 (1991).
15. Feldman R. (2004) The open source biotechnology movement: is it patent misuse? 6 Minnesota Journal of Law, Science & Technology 117 67.
16. Funk Brothers Seed Co. v. Kalo Inoculant Co., 333 U.S. 127 (1948).
17. General Talking Pictures v. Western Talking Pictures, 305 U.S. 124 (1938).
18. Hill v. Gateway 2000, 105 F.3d 1147 (7th Cir. 1997).
19. Hotmail Corp. v. Van Money Pie, Inc., 47 U.S.P.Q. 2d 1020 (N.D. Cal. 1998).
20. In re Merat, 519 F.2d 1390, 186 U.S.P.Q. 471 (CCPA 1975).
21. In re Wright, 999 F.2d 1557 (Fed. Cir. 1993).
22. International Preliminary Report on Patentability for PCT/US2005/002362 (Issued August 14 2006).
23. King Instruments Corp. v. Perego, 65 F.3d 941 (Fed. Cir. 1995).
24. Mallinckrodt, Inc. v. Medipart, Inc., 976 F.2d 700 (Fed. Cir. 1992).
25. Method of Bovine Herd Management, U.S. Patent No. 5351644 (filed February 25 1993).
26. Monsanto Co. v. McFarling, 363 F.3d 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2004).
27. Moye J.M. (2005) Recent development, the court of appeals of North Carolina's narrow approach to trade secrets protection in North Carolina Farm Partnership v. Pig Improvement Company, 83 North Carolina Law Review 1567 90.
28. Murray Hill Publications, Inc. v. Rosary Take-one Productions, Ltd. P'ship, 264 F.3d 622 (6th Cir. 2001).
29. North Carolina Farm Partnership v. Pig Improvement Co., 163 N.C. App. 318, 593 S.E.2d 126 (2004).
30. Principles and Guidelines for Recipients of NIH Research Grants and Contracts on Obtaining and Disseminating Biomedical Research Resources: Final Notice, 64 Fed. Reg. 72090 (December 23 1999).
31. Pro-CD, Inc. v. Zeidenberg, 86 F.3d 1447 (7th Cir. 1996).
32. Reingold v. Swiftships, Inc., 126 F.Ed. 645 (5th Cir. 1997).
33. Showmaker v. Advanta USA, Inc., 411 F.3d 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2005).
34. Southco, Inc. v. Kanebridge Corp., 390 F.3d 276 (3rd Cir. 2004).
35. Specht v. Netscape Communications Corp., 306 F.3d 17 (2nd Cir. 2002).
36. Transparent-Wrap Machine Corp. v. Stokes & Smith Co., 329 U.S. 637 (1947).
37. Unif. Trade Secrets Act (1985).
38. United States Trademark, Reg. No. 2512851, Owens-Corning Fiberglass Technology, Inc.
39. United States Trademark, Reg. No. 2519203 for General Mills Marketing, Inc.
40. United States Trademark, Reg. Nos. 2560618, Manhattan Oil.
41. United States Trademark, Reg. Nos. 2568512, Manhattan Oil.