On-site evaluation and triage for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology. The turin experience;Valutazione on-site e triage per la citologia agoaspirativa sotto guida ecoendoscopica. L'esperienza torinese

Minerva Medica

Volumn 98, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 395-400

  Campisi, P ^a,b   Accinelli, G ^a   De Angelis, C ^a   Pacchioni, D ^a   Bussolati, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

^b NONE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Endoscopy; EUS FNA; Triage; Ultrasonography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASPIRATION BIOPSY; CELL PROLIFERATION; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTODIAGNOSIS; CYTOMETRY; CYTOPATHOLOGY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; ENDOSCOPIC ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IMMUNOCYTOCHEMISTRY; LYMPHOMA; MEDICAL PRACTICE;

EID: 36749077516     PISSN: 00264806     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Ducatman BS, Hogan CL, Wang HH. A triage system for processing fine needle aspiration cytology specimens. Acta Cytol 1989;33:797-9.
2. Jhala NC, Jhala DN, Chhieng DC, Eloubeidi MA, Eltoum IA. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. A cytopathologist's perspective. Am J Clin Pathol 2003;120:351-67.
3. Suen KC. The Papanicolaou Society of cytopathology Task force on standards of practice. Guidelines of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology for Fine Needle Aspiration Procedure and reporting. Modern Pathology 1997;10:739-45.
4. Emery SC, Savides TJ, Behling CA. Utility of immediate evaluation of endoscopic ultrasound-guided transesophageal fine needle aspiration of mediastinal lymph nodes. Acta Cytol 2004;48:630-4.
5. Eltoum IA, Chhieng DC, Jhala D, Jhala NC, Crowe DR, Varadarajulu S et al. Cumulative sum procedure in evaluation of EUS-guided FNA cytology: the learning curve and diagnostic performance beyond sensitivity and specificity. Cytopathology 2007;18:143-50.
6. Silverman JF, Finley JL, O'Brien KF, Dabbs DJ, Park HK, Larkin EW et al. Diagnostic accuracy and role of immediate interpretation of fine needle aspiration biopsy specimens from various sites. Acta Cytol 1989;33:791-6.
7. Hall TL, Layfield LJ, Philippe A, Rosenthal DL. Sources of diagnostic error in fine needle aspiration of the thyroid. Cancer 1989;63:718-25.
8. Austin JH, Cohen MB. Value of having a cytopathologist present during percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy of lung: report of 55 cancer patients and meta-analysis of the literature. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993;160:175-7.
9. Miller DA, Carrasco CH, Katz RL, Cramer FM, Wallace S, Charnsangavej C. Fine needle aspiration biopsy: the role of immediate cytologic assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986;147:155-8.
10. Palombini L, Fulciniti F, Vetrani A, De Rosa G, Di Benedetto G, Zeppa P et al. Fine-needle aspiration biopsies of breast masses. A critical analysis of 1956 cases in 8 years (1976-1984). Cancer 1988;61:2273-7.
11. Chaiwan B, Settakorn J, Ya-in C. Effectiveness of fine-needle aspiration cutology of breast: Analysis of 2375 cases from northern Thailnad. Diagn Cytopathol 2002;26:201-5.
12. Klapman JB, Logrono R, Dye CE, Waxman I. Clinical impact of on-site cytopathology interpretation on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration. Am J Gastroenterol 2003;98:1289-94.
13. Layfield LJ, Bentz JS, Gopez EV. Immediate on-site interpretation of fine-needle aspiration smears: a cost and compensation analysis. Cancer 2001;93:319-22.
14. Chang KJ, Wiersema M, Giovannini M. Multi-center experience with endoscopic ultrosound (EUS) guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) of thepancreas. Gastrointest Endosc 1996;43:S49.
15. Giorgadze.TA, Peterman H, Baloch ZW. Diagnostic utility of mucin profile in fine-needle aspiration specimen of the pancreas. An immunohistochemical study with surgical pathology correlation. Cancer Cytopathol 2006;108:186-97.
16. Foo FJ, Verbeke CS, Guthrie JA, Ala A, Menon KV. Pancreatic and peripancreatic tuberculosis mimicking malignancy. JOP 2007;8:201-5.
17. Weiss ES, Klein WM, Yeo CJ. Peripancreatic tuberculosis mimicking pancreatic neoplasia. J Gastrointest Surg 2005;9:254-62.
18. Chang F, Vu C, Chandra A, Meenan J, Herbert A. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours: cytomorphological and immunocytochemical evaluation. Cytopathology 2006;17:10-7.
19. Nasuti JF, Gupta PK, Baloch ZW. Diagnostic value and cost-effectiveness of on-site evaluation of fine-needle aspiration specimens: review of 5,688 cases. Diagn Cytopathol 2002;27:1-4.
20. Layfield LJ, Bentz JS, Gopez EV. Immediate on-site interpretation of fine-needle aspiration smears: a cost and compensation analysis. Cancer 2001;93:319-22
21. Kim B, Chhieng DC, Crowe DR, Jhala D, Jhala N, Winokur T et al. Dynamic telecytopathology of on site rapid cytology diagnoses for pancreatic carcinoma. Cytojournal 2006;3:27.
22. Savoy AD, Raimondo M, Woodward TA, Noh K, Pungpapong S, Jones AD et al. Can endosonographers evaluate on-site cytologic adequacy? A comparison with cytotechnologists. Gastrointest Endosc 2007;65:953-7.