Improvement of femoral bone-cement adhesion in cemented revision hip arthroplasty by application of an amphiphilic bonder in a dynamic femur expulsion testing in vitro;Steigerung der femuralen knochen-knochenzement-verbundfestigkeit in der zementierten revisionshüftendoprothetik durch einen amphiphilen knochenhaftvermittler im dynamischen in-vitro ausstoßversuch

Biomedizinische Technik

Volumn 52, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 391-397

  Müller Rath, Ralf ^a   Andereya, Stefan ^a   Gravius, Sascha ^a   Wirtz, Dieter Christian ^b   Marx, Rudolf ^a   Mumme, Torsten ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL RWTH AACHEN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bone cement; Endoprosthesis; Femur; Glutaraldehyde; Hip simulator; Load to failure

Indexed keywords

ADHESION; ALDEHYDES; BIOMECHANICS; FRACTURE;

ENDOPROSTHESIS; GLUTARALDEHYDE; HIP SIMULATORS; LOAD TO FAILURE;

BONE CEMENT;

BONE CEMENT; GLUTARALDEHYDE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOPROSTHESIS; FEMUR; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; IMPLANTATION; IN VITRO STUDY; NONHUMAN;

ANIMALS; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; BIOMECHANICS; BONE CEMENTS; CATTLE; GENTAMICINS; HIP PROSTHESIS; METHYLMETHACRYLATES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SURFACE-ACTIVE AGENTS; VITALLIUM; WEIGHT-BEARING;

EID: 36749071548     PISSN: 00135585     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/BMT.2007.064     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Amstutz HC, Ma SM, Jinnah RH, Mai L. Revision of aseptic loose total hip arthroplasties. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1982; 170: 21-33.
2. An YH, Friedman RJ, editors. Animal models in orthopaedic research. Boca Raton: CRC Press 1999.
3. Callaghan JJ, Salvati EA, Pellicci PM, Wilson PD Jr, Ranawat CS. Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982. A two- to five-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1985; 67: 1074-1085.
4. Dohmae Y, Bechtold JE, Sherman RE, Puno RM, Gustilo RB. Reduction in cement-bone interface shear strength between primary and revision arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 1988; 236: 214-220.
5. Dohmen PM, da Costa F, Holinski S, et al. Is there a possibility for a glutaraldehyde-free porcine heart valve to grow? Eur Surg Res 2006; 38: 54-61.
6. Draenert K, Draenert Y, Garde U, Ulrich C. Manual of cementing technique. Berlin: Springer 1999.
7. Draenert K, Draenert Y. Die Adaptation des Knochens an die Deformation durch Implantate. Strain-Adaptive Bone Remodelling. Forschung und Fortbildung in der Chirurgie des Bewegungsapparates 3. München: Art und Science 1992.
8. Erli HJ, Marx R, Paar O, Niethard FU, Weber M, Wirtz DC. Surface pretreatments for medical application of adhesion. Biomed Eng Online 2003; 18,2: 15.
9. Fort FL, Goissis G, Plepis AM. Modifications on collagen structures promoted by 1,4-dioxane improve thermal and biological properties of bovine heart pericardium as a biomaterial. J Biomater Appl 2006; 6: 412-419.
10. Fratali O, Tantau M. Cleaning and disinfection in gastrointestinal endoscopy current status in Romania. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2006; 15: 89-93.
11. Haller B. Mechanismus und Wirksamkeit von Dentinhaftvermittlern. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1994; 49: 750-759.
12. Katagiri H, Suzuki T, Aizwa Y, Kadowaki T. Indoor glutaraldehyde levels in the endoscope disinfection room and subjective symptoms among workers. Ind Health 2006; 44: 225-229.
13. Kershaw CJ, Atkins RM, Dodd CA, Bulstrode CJ. Revision total hip arthroplasty for aseptic failure. A review of 276 cases. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1991; 73: 564-548.
14. Kühn K-D, Ege W, Gopp U. Acrylic bone cements: medical and physical properties. Orthop Clin N Am 2005; 36: 29-39.
15. Lee AJC. The time-dependent properties of polymethylacrylate bone cement: the interaction of shape of the femoral stems, surface finish and bone cement. In: Learmonth IA, editor. Interfaces in arthroplasty. London: Springer 2000: 11-20.
16. Lennon AB, Prendergast PJ. Evaluation of cement stresses in finite element analyses of cemented orthopaedic implants. J Biomechanical Eng 2001; 123: 623-628.
17. Majkowski RS, Miles AW, Bannister GC, Perkins J, Taylor GJS. Bone surface preparation in cemented joint replacement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 1993; 75: 459-463.
18. Marx R. Ursachen für das Versagen von Klebeverbindungen bei Adhäsivbrücken. Schweiz Monatssch Zahnmed 1987; 97: 1081-1086.
19. Marx R. Auswahl der Werkstoffe. In: Kerschbaum T, editor. Adhäsivprothetik. München: Urban und Schwarzenberg 1995: 107-120.
20. Marx R, Fischer H. Werkstück und Verfahren zum Herstellen und zum Verwerten des Werkstücks. München: Patentanmeldung PCT/DE 00/02702, 2000.
21. Marx R, Weber M. Vollkeramische Kronen- und Brückenmaterialien - Eigenschaften und Anforderungen. Aachen: Eigenverlag F&E-Labor Medizinische Werkstoffe RWTH Aachen 2001.
22. Müller K. Mechanische Eigenschaften nicht-modifizierter Knochenzemente auf PMMA-Basis. In: Willert HG, Buchhorn G, editors. Knochenzement - Werkstoff, klinische Erfahrungen, Weiterentwicklungen. Bern: Hans Huber Verlag 1987: 31-44.
23. Mumme T, Gravius S, Andereya S, Marx R, Wirtz DC, Müller-Rath R. Improvement of the long-term adhesive strength between bone cement and bone in cemented cup arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Traum Surg (zur Publikation akzeptiert).
24. Nakabayashi N, Pashley DH. Hybridization of dental hard tissues. Tokyo: Quintessence Books 1998.
25. United States National Library of Medicine/Toxnet/Toxicology Data Network.
26. Verdonschot N, Huiskes R. Cement debonding process of total hip arthroplasty stems. Clin Orthop 1997; 336: 297-307.
27. Wirtz DC. Eine neue Beschichtungsmethode für zementierte Femurschaftimplantate zur hydrolysestabilen Optimierung des Metall- Knochenzement-Verbundes. Aachen: Wissenschaftsverlag Mainz 2002.
28. Wirtz DC, Lelgemann B, Jungwirth F, Niethard FU, Marx R. A new method to optimize the adhesion between bone cement and acetabular bone in total hip arthroplasty. Z Orthop 2003; 141: 209-16.