Factors governing inhibition of occluded regions in superimposed objects

Visual Cognition

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 95-99

  Chambers, Destinee ^a   Cave, Kyle ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; CONFERENCE PAPER; EYE FIXATION; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VERBAL BEHAVIOR; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION;

EID: 36749067326     PISSN: 13506285     EISSN: 14640716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (4)

1. Cave, K. R., & Wake, D. (2001). Attending to locations of superimposed visual objects. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Psychonomic Society, Orlando, FL, November.
2. Davis, G., & Driver, J. (1997). Spreading of visual attention to modally versus amodally completed regions. Psychological Science, 8, 275-281.
3. Haimson, C., & Behrmann, M. (2001). Cued visual attention does not distinguish between occluded and occluding objects. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 8(3), 496-503.
4. Moore, C. M., & Fulton, C. (2005). The spread of attention to hidden portions of occluded surfaces. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12(2), 301-306.