A systematic approach for the selection of business processes for E-enablement

International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making

Volumn 6, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 649-669

  Salhieh, Sa'ed M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF JORDAN   (Jordan)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchy process; E business; E enablement; Selection model

Indexed keywords

EID: 36749066039     PISSN: 02196220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1142/S021962200700268X     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. D. Phan, E-business success at Intel: An organization ecology and resource dependence perspective, Indus. Manage. Data Syst. 102(4) (2002) 211-217.
2. K. Chang, J. Jackson and V. Grover, E-commerce and corporate strategy: An executive perspective, Inform. Manage. 40 (2003) 663-675.
3. L. Piris, G. Fitzgerald and A. Serrano, Strategic motivators and expected benefits from e-commerce in traditional organizations, Int. J. Inform. Manage. 24(6) (2004) 489-506.
4. J. Rodgers, D. Yen and D. Chou, Developing e-business: A strategic approach, Inform. Manage. Comp. Security 10(4) (2002) 184-192.
5. N. Tang, M. Burridge and A. Ang, Development of an electronic business planning model for small and medium-sized enterprises, Int. J. Logistics: Res. Appl. 6(4) (2003) 289-304.
6. M. Gibson, Z. Lin and J. Burns, E-business experiences of practitioners and consultants, Inform. Syst. Manage. 20(3) (2003) 8-21.
7. C. Ihlström and M. Nilsson, E-business adoption by SMEs -Prerequisites and attitudes of SMEs in a Swedish network, J. Organizational Comput. Electr. Comm. 13(3 & 4) (2003) 211-223.
8. I. Fillis, U. Johannson and B. Wagner, Factors impacting on e-business adoption and development in the smaller firm, Int. J. Entrepreneurial Behav. Res. 10(3) (2004) 178-191.
9. K. Laudon and J. Laudon, Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm, 7th edn. (Prentice-Hall, 2002).
10. R. McLeod and G. Schell, Management Information Systems, 9th edn. (Pearson/ Prentice-Hall, 2004).
11. M. Robinson and R. Kalakota, E-business Roadmap for Success (Addison-Wesley, London, 2000).
12. D. Barnes, M. Hinton and S. Mieczkowska, Competitive advantage through e-operations, TQM Business Exceli. 14(6) (2003) 659-675.
13. T. Teo, P. Wong and E. Chia, Information technology (IT) investment and the role of a firm: An exploratory study, Int. J. Inform. Manage. 20 (2000) 269-286.
14. I. McKeown and G. Philip, Business transformation, information technology and competitive strategies: Learning to fly, Int. J. Inform. Manage. 23(1) (2003) 3-24.
15. J. Karlsen, J. Andersen, L. Birkely and E. Degard, What characterize successful IT projects, Int. J. Inform. Technol. Decision Making 4(4) (2005) 525-540.
16. A. Gunasekaran and B. Kobu, Modelling and analysis of business process reengineering, Int. J. Prod. Res. 40(11) (2002) 2521-2546.
17. I. Wu, A model for implementing BPR, based on strategic perspectives: An empirical study, Inform. Manage. 39 (2002) 313-324.
18. F. Zhao, Management of information technology and business process reengineering: A case study, Indus. Manage. Data Syst. 104(8) (2004) 674-680.
19. I. Tatsiopoulos, N. Panayiotou and S. Ponis, A modelling and evaluation methodology for E-Commerce enabled BPR, Comp. Indus. 49 (2002) 107-121.
20. E. Peacock and M. Tanniru, Activity-based justification of IT investments, Inform. Manage. 42 (2005) 415-424.
21. K. Kosanke, F. Vernadat and M. Zelm, CIMOSA: Enterprise engineering and integration, Comput. Indus. 40 (1999) 83-97.
22. G. Berio and F. Vernadat, Enterprise modelling with CIMOSA: Functional and organizational aspects, Prod. Plan. Contr. 12(2) (2001) 128-136.
23. M. Broadbent, P. Weill, D. St. Clair and A. Kearney, The implications of information technology infrastructure for business process redesign, MIS Quarterly: Manage. Inform. Syst. 23(2) (1999) 159-182.
24. P. Ball, P. Albores and J. MacBryde, Requirements for modelling e-Business processes, Prod. Plan. Contr. 15(8) (2004) 776-785.
25. T. L. Saaty, The Analytical, Hierarchy Process (McGraw-Hill, 1980).
26. A. Scholl, L. Manthey, R., Helm and M. Steiner, Solving multiattribute design problems with analytic hierarchy process and conjoint analysis: An empirical comparison, Eur. J. Operai. Res. 164 (2005) 760-777.
27. N. S. Thomaidis, N. Nikitakos and G. D. Dounias, The evaluation of information technology projects: A fuzzy multicriteria decision-making approach, Int. J. Inform. Technol. Decision Making 5(1) (2006) 89-122.
28. S. Zahir, Making public policy decisions using a web-based multicriteria electoral system (MCES), Int. J. Inform. Technol. Decision Making 1(2) (2002) 293-309.
29. S. Zahir, Eliciting ratio preferences for the analytic hierarchy process with visual Interfaces: A new mode of preference measurement, Int. J. Inform. Technol. Decision Making 5(2) (2006) 245-261.
30. W. L. Winston, Operations Research: Applications and Algorithms, 4th edn. (Brooks/Cole-Thomson Learning, 2004), pp. 785-793.