A preliminary study on the changes of the regional scale macroscopic vulnerability to earthquake disasters of Beijing, Tianjin and Tangshan area - Spatial changes

Dizhen Dizhi

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 15-33

  Su, Gui Wu ^a   Zhu, Lin ^a   Ma, Zong Jin ^a   Wu, Qiong ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Beijing; Regional scale macroscopic vulnerability to earthquake disasters (RSMVED); Spatial change; Tianjin and Tangshan area; Vulnerability pattern

Indexed keywords

DISASTER MANAGEMENT; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; NATURAL DISASTER; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SUBURBAN AREA; URBAN AREA; VULNERABILITY;

ASIA; BEIJING [CHINA]; CHINA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; HEBEI; TANGSHAN; TIANJIN;

EID: 36749040235     PISSN: 02534967     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. CHEN Yong, CHEN Qi-fu, CHEN Ling. 1999. Vulnerability analysis in earthquake loss estimate [J]. Earthquake Research in China, 15(2):97-105 (in Chinese).
2. DENG Yan, NIE Gao-zhong, SU Gui-wu. 2005. Analysis on influential factors of earthquake emergency response [J]. Journal of Catastrophology, 20(2):27-33 (in Chinese).
3. HU Yu-xian. 1988. Earthquake Engineering [M ]. Seimological Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
4. Working Group of Researches on Prediction of Chinese Earthquake Losses with Scale of Ten Years. 1995. Atlas of Predictions of Chinese Earthquake Losses [Z]. Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
5. SHI Pei-jun. 2002. Theory on disaster science and disaster dynamics [J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 11(3):1-9 (in Chinese).
6. SU Gui-wu, DENG Yan, NIE Gao-zhong. 2005. The preliminary study on macro-scale zonation of earthquake emergency response (EER) of China [J]. Seismology and Geology, 27(3):382-395 (in Chinese).
7. Applied Technology Council of US (ed). 1991. Earthquake Damage Evaluation Data for California [M]. Translated by CAO Xin-ling, MAO Guo-min, JIN Xue-shen, et al. Seismological Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
8. WANG Jing-ai, SHANG Yan-rui, SU Yun, et al. 2005. A vulnerability diagnosis of agricultural drought disasters and regional sustainable development in China [J]. Jounal of Beijing Normal University (Art and Social Science), 3: 130-137 (in Chinese).
9. YIN Zhi-qian. 1996. Classification of structure vulnerability and evaluating earthquake damage from future earthquake [J]. Earthquake Research in China, 12(1):49-58 (in Chinese).
10. Alexander David. 1997. The Study of Natural Disasters (1977-1997): Some Reflections on a Changing Field of Knowledge [J]. Disasters, 21(4):284-304.
11. Blakie P, Cannon T, Davis I, et al. 1994. At Risk: Natural Hazards, People's Vulnerability and Disaster [M]. London: Routledge.
12. Burton I, Katers R W, White G F. 1993. The Environment as Hazard (2nd Edition) [M]. New York and London: Guilford Press.
13. Committee of the International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction. 1999. Final Report of the International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction (IDNDR) [R]. http://www.idndr.org/stcrep.htm.
14. Cross J A. 2001. Megacities and small towns: different perspectives on hazard vulnerability[J]. Environmental Hazards 3:63-80.
15. Cutter S L. 1996. Vulnerability to Environmental Hazards [J]. Progress in Human Geography, 20(4):529-539.
16. Cutter S L, Mitchell J T, Scott M S. 2000. Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: A case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina [J]. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90(4):713-737.
17. Fah D, Kind F, Lang K, et al. 2001. Earthquake scenarios for the city of Basel [J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 21:405-413.
18. Gary Shook. 1997. An Assessment of Disaster Risk and Its Management in Thailand [J]. Disasters, 21(1):77-88.
19. Giardini D, Grünthal G, Shedlock K M, et al. 1999. The GSHAP Global Seismic Hazard Map [J]. Annali Di Geofisica, 42(6):1225-1230.
20. Irasema Alcántara-Ayala. 2002. Geomorphology, natural hazards, vulnerability and prevention of natural disasters in developing countries [J]. Geomorphology, 47:107-124.
21. Méheux K, Parker E. 2006. Tourist sector perceptions of natural hazards in Vanuatu and the implications for a small island developing state [J]. Tourism Management, 27:69-85.
22. Panel on Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology, Committee on Earthquake Engineering, Commission on Engineering and Technical Systems & National Research Council. 1989. Estimating Losses from Future Earthquakes [M]. Issued by FEMA(FEMA-177), Printed in USA.
23. Solway Louis. 1994. Urban Developments and Mega-cities: Vulnerability to Natural Disasters [J]. Disaster Management, 6(3):160-169.
24. UNDRO. 1982. Natural Disasters and Vulnerability Analysis [R]. Office of the UN Disaster Relief Coordinator. Geneva.
25. UN/International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction (IDNDR) [R]. 2005. http://geohaz.org/radius/.
26. US/Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) [R]. 2006. http://www.fema.gov/hazus/.
27. White G F, Katers R W, Burton I. 2001. Knowing better and losing even more: the use of knowledge in hazards management [J]. Environmental Hazards, 3(3,4):81-92.