Innovation and leadership values

California Management Review

Volumn 50, Issue 1, 2007, Pages

  Miles, Raymond E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36749038756     PISSN: 00081256     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2307/41166423     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. See for example, M.L. Tushman and C.A. O'Reilly III, Winning Through Innovation (Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1997).
2. For a review, see Peter Drucker, "Knowledge-Worker Productivity: The Biggest Challenge," California Management Review, 41/2 (Winter 1999): 79-94.
3. Drucker was among the first to focus attention on knowledge and knowledge workers. P.A.W. Käser and R.E. Miles, "Understanding Knowledge Activists' Successes and Failures," Long Range Planning, 35/1 (February 2002): 9-28.
4. See, also, M. Hammer, D. Leonard, and T.H. Davenport, "Why Don't We Know More About Knowledge?" MIT Sloan Management Review, 45/4 (Summer 2004): 14-18.
5. World Economic Forum, Global Competitiveness Report, 2006-2007.
6. See, for example, R.E. Miles, "Human Relations or Human Resource?" Harvard Business Review, 43/4 (July/August 1965): 148-157;
7. R.E. Miles Theories of Management (New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1975);
8. R.E. Miles and C.C. Snow, Fit, Failure and the Hall of Fame (New York, NY: Free Press, 1994);
9. R.E. Miles, G. Miles, and C.C. Snow, Collaborative Entrepreneurship (Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2005).
10. S. Ghoshal and P. Moran, "Bad for Practice: A Critique of the Transaction Cost Theory," Academy of Management Review, 21/1 (January 1996): 13-47;
11. H. Mintzberg, Managers Not MBAs (San Francisco, CA: Barrett-Kohler, 2004);
12. J. Pfeffer and C.T. Fong, "The End of Business Schools? Less Success Than Meets the Eye, "Academy of Management Learning and Education," 1/1 (September 2002): 78-95;
13. F. Ferraro, J. Pfeffer, and R.I. Sutton, "Economics Language and Assumptions: How Theories Can Become Self-Fulfilling, Academy of Management Review, 30/1 (January 2005): 8-24.
14. Sumantra Ghoshal, "Bad Management Theories Are Destroying Good Management Practices," Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4/1 (March 2005): 75-91.
15. Particularly bad theories cited by Ghoshal were agency theory, as portrayed in M.C. Jensen and W.H. Meckling, "Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Ownership Structure," Journal of Financial Economics, 3/4 (October 1976): 305-360;
16. transactions cost economics, as portrayed in O. Williamson, Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications (New York, NY: Free Press, 1975);
17. and the "five forces" framework as presented by M. Porter, Competitive Strategy (New York, NY: Free Press, 1980).
18. Commentaries were offered following Ghoshal's critique. Rosabeth Moss Kanter, "What Theories Do Audiences Want? Exploring the Demand Side," Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4/1 (March 2005): 93-95;
19. Jeffrey Pfeffer, "Why Do Bad Management Theories Persist? A Comment on Ghoshal," Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4/1 (March 2005): 96-100;
20. John Capper, "Comment on Sumantra Ghoshal's Article," Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4/1 (March 2005): 101-103;
21. Donald C. Hambrick, "Just How Bad Are Our Theories? A Response to Ghoshal," Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4/1 (March 2005): 104-107;
22. Henry Mintzberg, "How Inspiring. How Sad. Comment on Sumantra Ghoshal's Paper," Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4/1 (March 2005): 108-109;
23. Lex Donaldson, "For Positive Management Theories While Retaining Science: Reply to Ghoshal," Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4/1 (March 2005): 109-113.
24. Ferraro, Pfeffer, and Sutton, op. cit.
25. J.P. Walsh, K. Weber, and J.D. Margolis, "Social Issues and Management: Our Lost Cause Found," Journal of Management, 29/6 (December 2003): 859-881.
26. G. Miles, N. Evangelopoulos, and L. Russell, "Trends in Management Research: A Comparative Review Using Latent Semantics," paper presented at the Academy of Management, August 2007.
27. R.E. Miles and C.C. Snow, Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process (New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1978);
28. R.E. Miles and C.C. Snow, "Network Organizations: New Concepts for New Forms," California Management Review, 28/3 (Spring 1986): 62-73.
29. I. Nonaka and H. Takeuchi, The Knowledge Creating Company (New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 1995).
30. R. Kramer and T. Tyler, Trust in Organizations (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1996).
31. K. Blomqvist, "Partnering in the Dynamic Environment: The Role of Trust in Asymmetric Technology Partnership Formation," Ph.D. dissertation, Lappeenranta University of Technology, 2002.
32. Peter Lewis, "Texas Instruments' Lunatic Fringe," Fortune, September 4, 2006.
33. The IBM-Intel community is described in .
34. P. Drucker, The Practice of Management (New York, NY: Harper and Brothers, 1954).
35. D. McGregor, The Human Side of Enterprise (New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1960).
36. R. Likert, New Patterns of Management (New York, NY: McGraw-Hill, 1961).
37. Miles (1965), op. cit.; R.E. Miles, "The Affluent Organization," Harvard Business Review, 44/3 (May/June 1966): 106-114;
38. J.B. Ritchie and R.E. Miles, "An Analysis of Quantity and Qual-ity of Participation as Mediating Variables in the Participative Decision Making Process," Personnel Psychology, 23 (1970): 347-359;
39. Miles (1975), op. cit.
40. Miles and Snow (1994), op. cit.
41. See R.E. Miles, "Organization Development," in G. Strauss, R.E. Miles, C.C. Snow, and A.S. Tannenbaum, Organizational Behavior: Research and Issues (Madison, WI: Industrial Relations Research Association, 1974).
42. R. Bendix, Work and Authority in Industry: Ideologies of Management in the Course of Industrialization (New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons, 1956).
43. R.E. Miles, C.C. Snow, and G. Miles, "The Ideology of Innovation," Strategic Organization, 5 (2007): 425-438.
44. E.L. Deci and R.M. Ryan, Intrinsic Motivation and Self Determination in Human Behavior (New York, NY: Plenum Press, 1975);
45. F. Herzberg, Work and the Nature of Man (Cleveland, OH: World Publishing, 1966).
46. Miles, Snow, and Miles (2007), op. cit.
47. P. Donaldson and L.E. Preston, "The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, Implications," Academy of Management Review, 20/1 (January 1995): 65-91.
48. J.H. Davis, F.D. Schoorman, and L. Donaldson, "Toward a Stewardship Theory of Management," Academy of Management Review, 22/1 (January 1997): 20-47;
49. R.S. Kaplan and O.P. Norton, The Balanced Scorecard: Translating Strategy into Action (Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press, 1996).
50. C. Peterson and M. Seligman, "Positive Organizational Studies: Lessons from Positive Psychology," in K.S. Cameron, J.E. Dutton, and R.E. Quinn, eds., Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline (San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, 2003).