Symptomatic cases: Hysteria in the supreme court's nude dancing decisions

American Imago

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 297-316

  Adler, Amy ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 36749036220     PISSN: 0065860X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/aim.2007.0031     Document Type: Review

References (47)

1. Adler, Amy. 2005. Girls! Girls! Girls!: The Supreme Court Confronts the G-String. New York University Law Review, 80:1108-55.
2. Amar, Akhil Reed. 2000. Foreword: The Document and the Doctrine. Harvard Law Review, 114:26-134.
3. Aragon, Louis, and André Breton. 1928. Le Cinquantenaire de l'hysterie, 1878-1928 [The Fiftieth Anniversary of Hysteria]. In Breton, Oeuvres Complètes. Ed. Marguerite Bonnet. Paris: Gallimard, 1988, pp. 948-50.
4. Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc. 501 U.S. 560. (1991).
5. nd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.
6. Boos v. Barry, 485 U.S. 312 (1988).
7. Brooks, Peter. 1993. Body Work: Objects of Desire in Modern Narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. City of Erie v. Pap's A.M., 529 U.S. 277 (2000).
9. City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc., 535 U.S. 425 (2002).
10. City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc., 475 U.S. 41 (1986).
11. Cixous, Hélène. 1976. The Laugh of the Medusa. Trans. Keith and Paula Cohen. In Marks and de Courtivron 1980, pp. 245-64.
12. Cixous, Hélène, and Catherine Clément. 1986. The Untenable. In Bernheimer and Kahane 1990, pp. 276-93.
13. David-Ménard, Monique. 1983. Hysteria from Freud to Lacan: Body and Language in Psychoanalysis. Trans. Catherine Porter. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989.
14. th ed. Trans. William A. White and Smith Ely Jelliffe. New York: Funk & Wagnalls.
15. Foucault, Michel. 1976. The History of Sexuality: An Introduction. Vol. 1. Trans. Robert Hurley. New York: Random House, 1978.
16. Freud, Sigmund. 1893. Charcot. S.E., 3:11-23.
17. 1905. Fragment of an Analysis of a Case of Hysteria. S.E., 7:7-122.
18. 1908. Hysterical Fantasies and Their Relation to Bisexuality. S.E., 9:155-66.
19. Goldstein, Jan. 1987. Console and Classify: The French Psychiatric Profession in the Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
20. Hacking, Ian. 1996. Automatisme Ambulatoire: Fugue, Hysteria, and Gender at the Turn of the Century. Modernism/Modernity, 3:31-43.
21. Harvard Law Review. 1991. The Supreme Court, 1990 Term - Leading Cases. Harvard Law Review, 105:177-426.
22. Hertz, Neil. 1983. Dora's Secrets, Freud's Techniques. In Bernheimer and Kahane 1990, pp. 221-42.
23. Howard, Alan J. 2000. When Can the Moral Majority Rule?: The Real Dilemma at the Core of the Nude Dancing Cases. St. Louis University Law Journal, 44:897-908.
24. Hutcheon, Linda, and Michael Hutcheon. 2000. Staging the Female Body: Richard Strauss's Salome. In Mary Ann Smart, ed., Siren Songs: Representations of Gender and Sexuality in Opera. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 204-21.
25. Justice-Malloy, Rhona. 1995. Charcot and the Theatre of Hysteria. Journal of Popular Culture, 28:133-38.
26. Kristeva, Julia. 1974. Oscillation between Power and Denial. Trans. Marilyn A. August. In Marks and de Courtivron 1980, pp. 165-67.
27. Law, Sylvia A. 2000. Commercial Sex: Beyond Decriminalization. Southern California Law Review, 73:523-610.
28. Linz, Daniel, et al. 2004. An Examination of the Assumption that Adult Businesses Are Associated with Crime in Surrounding Areas: A Secondary Effects Study in Charlotte, North Carolina. Law and Society Review, 38:69-104.
29. Lyotard, Jean-François. 1988. Speech Snapshot. In The Inhuman: Reflections on Time. Trans. Geoffrey Bennington and Rachel Bowlby. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991, pp. 129-34.
30. Maines, Rachel P. 1999. The Technology of Orgasm: "Hysteria, " the Vibrator, and Women's Sexual Satisfaction. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
31. Marks, Elaine, and Isabelle de Courtivron, eds. 1980. New French Feminisms: An Anthology. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
32. McCarren, Felicia. 1995. The "Symptomatic Act" Circa 1900: Hysteria, Hypnosis, Electricity, Dance. Critical Inquiry, 21:748-74.
33. Micale, Mark. 1995. Approaching Hysteria: Disease and Its Interpretations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
34. Miller v. Civil City of South Bend, 904 F.2d 1081 (7th Cir. 1990) (en bane).
35. Moi, Toril. 1981. Representation of Patriarchy: Sexuality and Epistemology in Freud's Dora. In Bernheimer and Kahane 1990, pp. 181-99.
36. nd ed. New York: Carrol and Graf, 2002.
37. Paul, Bryant, et al. 2001. Government Regulation of "Adult" Businesses Through Zoning and Anti-Nudity Ordinances: Debunking the Legal Myth of Negative Secondary Effects. Communication Law & Policy, 6:355-91.
38. Pap's A.M. v. City of Erie, 719 A.2d 273, 279 (Pa. 1998). rev'd, 529 U.S. 277 (2000).
39. Posner, Richard A. 2002. Pragmatism Versus Purposivism in First Amendment Analysis. Stanford Law Review, 54:737-52.
40. Rose, Jacqueline. 1978. Dora: Fragment of an Analysis. In Bernheimer and Kahane 1990, pp. 128-146.
41. Schad v. Borough of Mount Ephraim, 452 U.S. 61 (1981).
42. Showalter, Elaine. 1997. Hysterics: Hysterical Epidemics and Modern Media. New York: Columbia University Press.
43. Sullivan, Kathleen M. 2001. Sex, Money, and Groups: Free Speech and Association Decisions in the October 1999 Term. Pepperdine Law Review, 28:723-47.
44. Triplett Grille, Inc. v. City of Akron, 40 F.3d 129 (6th Cir. 1994).
45. White, Deborah Elise. 1989. Studies on Hysteria: Case Histories and the Case Against History. Comparative Literature., 104: 1035-49.
46. Williams, Linda. 1989. Hard Core: Power, Pleasure, and the "Frenzy of the Visible. "Berkeley: University of California Press.
47. Young v. American Mini Theaters, Inc., 427 U.S. 50 (1976).