On the empirical bayes approach to the problem of multiple testing

Quality and Reliability Engineering International

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 727-739

  Bogdan, Małgorzata ^a,b   Ghosh, Jayanta K ^b   Ochman, Aleksandra ^a   Tokdar, Surya T ^c  

^a WROCLAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^b PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Empirical Bayes; False discovery rate; Multiple testing

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROBLEM SOLVING;

EMPIRICAL BAYES; FALSE DISCOVERY RATE; MULTIPLE TESTING;

INDUSTRIAL APPLICATIONS;

EID: 36749032653     PISSN: 07488017     EISSN: 10991638     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/qre.876     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (25)

1. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate - a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 1995; 57:289-300.
2. Efron B, Tibshirani R, Storey JD, Tusher V. Empirical Bayes analysis of a microarray experiment. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2001; 96:1151-1160.
3. Efron B, Tibshirani R. Empirical Bayes methods and false discovery rates for microarrays. Genetic Epidemiology 2002; 23:70-86.
4. Storey JD. The positive false discovery rate: A Bayesian interpretation and the q-value. Annals of Statistics 2003; 31:2013-2035.
5. Müller P, Parmigiani G, Robert C, Rousseau J. Optimal sample size for multiple testing: The case of gene expression microarrays. Journal of the American Statistical Association 2004; 99:990-1001.
6. Scott JG, Berger JO. An exploration of aspects of Bayesian multiple testing. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 2006; 136:2144-2162.
7. Chardon F, Virlon B, Moreau L, Falque M, Joets J, Decousset L, Murigneux A, Charcosset A. Genetic architecture of flowering time in maize as inferred from quantitative trait loci meta-analysis and synteny conservation with the rice genome. Genetics 2004; 168:2169-2185.
8. Khatkar MS, Thomson PC, Tammen I, Raadsma HW. Quantitative trait loci mapping in dairy cattle: Review and meta-analysis. Genetic Selection Evolution 2004; 36:163-190.
9. Walling GA, Visscher PM, Andersson L, Rotschild MF, Wang L, Moser G, Groenen MAM, Bidanel J-P, Cepica S, Archibald AL, Geldermann H, de Koning DJ, Milan D, Haley CS. Combining analyses of data from quantitative trait loci mapping studies: Chromosome 4 effects of porcine growth and fatness. Genetics 2000; 155:1369-1378.
10. Dick DM, Foroud T. Genetic strategies to detect genes involved in alcoholism and alcohol-related traits. Alcohol Research and Health 2002; 26:172-180.
11. Lynch M, Walsh B. Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer: Sunderland, MA, 1998.
12. Bogdan M, Ghosh JK, Tokdar ST. A comparison of the Simes-Benjamini- Hochberg procedure with some Bayesian rules for multiple testing. Institute of Mathematical Statistics volume for Prof. P. K. Sen 2007, to appear.
13. Efron B, Morris C. Stein's estimation rule and its competitors-an empirical Bayes approach. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1975; 68:117-130.
14. Yi N. A unified Markov chain Monte Carlo framework for mapping multiple quantitative trait loci. Genetics 2004; 167:967-975.
15. Broét P, Richardson S. Detection of gene copy number changes in CGH microarrays using a spatially correlated mixture model. Bioinformatics 2006; 22:911-918.
16. Holm S. A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics 1979; 6:65-70.
17. Seeger P. A note on a method for the analysis of significance en masse. Technometrics 1968; 10:586-593.
18. Simes RJ. An improved Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 1986; 73:751-754.
19. Sorić B. Statistical 'discoveries' and effect-size estimation. Journal of the American Statistical Association 1989; 84:608-610.
20. Benjamini Y, Yekutieli D. The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Annals of Statistics 2001; 29:1165-1188.
21. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. On the adaptive control of the false discovery fate in multiple testing with independent statistics. Journal of Educational Behavioral Statistics 2000; 25:60-83.
22. Genovese C, Wasserman L. Operating characteristics and extensions of the false discovery rate procedure. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 2002; 64:499-517.
23. Abramovich F, Benjamini Y, Donoho DL, Johnstone IM. Adapting to unknown sparsity by controlling the false discovery rate. Annals of Statistics 2006; 34:584-653.
24. Donoho D, Jin J. Higher criticism for detecting sparse heterogeneous mixtures. Annals of Statistics 2004; 32:962-994.
25. Efron B. Robbins, Empirical Bayes and microarrays. Annals of Statistics 2003; 31:366-378.