Methodology for the design and analysis of reaction-separation systems with recycle. 1. The design perspective

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 46, Issue 24, 2007, Pages 8066-8083

  Ramírez, Edgar ^a,b   Gani, Rafiqul ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO NACIONAL   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBLEM SOLVING; RECYCLING;

ETHYLBENZENE PRODUCTION; MODEL-BASED ANALYSIS;

SEPARATORS;

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PROBLEM SOLVING; RECYCLING; SEPARATORS;

EID: 36749031070     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie061327x     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Bildea, C.; Dimian, A.; Iedema, P. Nonlinear behavior of reactor-separator-recycle systems. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2000, 24, 209-215.
2. Recke. B. O.; Jørgensen, S. B. Nonlinear Dynamics and Control of a Recycle Fixed Bed Reactor. In Proceedings of the 16th American Control Conference, Vol. 4; American Control Conference: Albuquerque, NM, 1997; pp 2218-2222.
3. Morud, J.; Skogestad, S. Dynamic behaviour of integrated plants. J. Process Control 1996, 6, 145-156.
4. Douglas, J. M. Conceptual Design of Chemical Processes, 1st Edition; McGraw-Hill Chemical Engineering Series; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1988.
5. Himmelblau, D. M.; Bischoff, K. B. Process Analysis and Simulation. John Wiley: New York, 1992.
6. Larsson, T.; Skogestad, S. Model. Idem. Control 2000, 21, 209-240.
7. Fisher, W. R.; Doherty, M. F.; Douglas. J. M. The Interface between Design and Control. 2. Process Operability. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1988, 27, 606-611.
8. Cui, H.; Jacobsen, E. Performance limitations in descentralized control. J. Process Control 2002, 12, 485-494.
9. Lyman, P. R.; Luyben, W. L.; Tyreus, B. D. Method for Assessing the Effect of Design Parameters on Controllability. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1996, 35, 3484-3497.
10. Hangos, K.; Hallager, L.; Csaki, Z.; Jørgensen, S. A qualitative model for simulation of the start-up of a distillation column with energy feedback. In Computer-Oriented Process Engineering; Puigjaner, L., Espuna, A., Eds.; Proceedings of COPE-91, 22nd European Symposium of the Working Party on the Use of Computers in Chemical Engineering of the European Federation of Chemical Engineering (EFChE); Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1991.
11. Luyben, W. Snowball Effects in Reactor/Separator Processes with Recycle. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1994, 33, 299-305.
12. Russel, B. M.; Henriksen, J. P.; Jørgensen, S. B.; Gani, R. Integration of design and control through model analysis. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2002, 26, 213-225.
13. Wu, K.-L.; Yu, C.-C. Reactor/Separator Processes with Recycle. 1. Candidate Control Structures for Operability. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1996, 20, 1291-1316.
14. Seferlis, P.; Georgiadis, M. C. The Integration of Process Design and Control; Computer-Aided Chemical Engineering, Vol. 17; Elsevier B.V.: Amsterdam, 2004.
15. Luyben, W. Dynamics and Control of Recycle Systems. 1. Simple Open-Loop and Closed-Loop Systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1993, 32, 466-475.
16. Tyréus, B. D.; Luyben, W. L. Dynamics and Control of Recycle Systems. 4. Ternary Systems with One or Two Recycle Streams. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1993, 32, 1154-1162.
17. Luyben, M. L.; Luyben, W. L. Design and Control of a Complex Process Involving Two Reaction Steps, Three Distillation Columns, and Two Recycle Streams. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1995, 34, 3885-3898.
18. Wu, K.-L.; Yu, C.-C.; Luyben, W. L.; Skogestad, S. Reactor/Separator Processes with recycles. 2. Design for composition control. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2002, 27, 401-421.
19. Bildea, C. S.; Dimian, A. C. Fixing Flow Rates in Recycle Systems: Luyben's Rule Revisited. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2003, 42, 4578-4585.
20. Pushpavanam. S.; Kienle, A. Nonlinear behavior of an ideal reactor separator network with mass recycle. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2001, 56, 2837-2849.
21. Luyben, W. L. Steady-State Energy Conservation Aspects of Distillation Column Control System Design. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1975, 14, 321-325.
22. Yi, C. K.; Luyben, W. L. Evaluation of Plant-Wide Control Structures by Steady-State Disturbance Sensitivity Analysis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1995, 34, 2393-2405.
23. Semino, D.; Giuliani, G. Control Configuration Selection by in Recycle Systems by Steady State Analysis. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1997, 21, S273-S278.
24. McAvoy, T.; Miller, R. Incorporating Integrating Variables into Steady-State Models for Plantwide Control Analysis and Design. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1999, 38, 412-420.
25. Arkun, Y.; Downs, J. A General Method to Calculate Input-Output Gains and the Relative Gain Array for Integrating Processes. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1990, 14, 1101-1110.
26. Weitz, O.; Lewin, D. Dynamic controllability and resiliency diagnosis using steady state process flowsheet data. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1996, 20, 325-335.
27. Luyben, M. L.; Floudas, C. A. Analyzing the Interaction of Design and Control - 1. A Multiobjective Framerwork and Application to Binary Distillation Synthesis. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1994, 18, 933-969.
28. Luyben, M. L.; Floudas, C. A. Analyzing the Interaction of Design and Control - 2. Reactor - Separator-Recycle System. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1994, 18, 971-994.
29. McAvoy, T. J. Synthesis of Plantwide Control Systems using Optmization. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1999, 38, 2984-2994.
30. Luyben, W. L.; Tyréus, B. D.; Luyben, M. L. Plantwide Process Control; McGraw-Hill: New York, 1999.
31. Bansal, V.; Perkins, J. D.; Pistikopoulos, E. N. A Case Study in Simultaneous Design and Control Using Rigorous, Mixed-Integer Dynamic Optimization Models. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2002, 41, 760-778.
32. Mönnigmann, M.; Marquardt, W. Parametrically robust control-integrated design of nonlinear systems. In Proceedings of the 2002 American Control Conference, Vol. 6; American Control Conference: Anchorage, AK, 2002.
33. Mohideen, M. J.; Perkins, J. D; Pistikopoulos, E. N. A Framework for Process Design and Control. In Control '96, UKACC International Conference on Control (Conference Publication No. 427), Vol. 2; Institution of Electrical Engineers (IEE): London, U.K., 1996; pp 918-923.
34. Morari, M. Integrated plant control: a solution at hand or a research topic for the next decade?. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Chemical Process Control (CPC-2), Sea Island, GA, 1982.
35. Skogestad, S. Plantwide control: the search of the self-optimizing control structure. J. Process Control 2000, 10, 487-507.
36. Halvorsen, I. J.; Skogestad, S.; Morud, J. C.; Alstad, V. Optimal Selection of Controlled Variables. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2003, 42, 3273-3284.
37. Skogestad, S. Control structure design for complete chemical plants. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2004, 28, 219-234.
38. Nishida, N.; Stephanopoulos, G.; Westerberg, A. W. A Review of Process Synthesis. AIChE J. 1981, 27, 321.
39. Fisher, W. R.; Doherty, M. F.; Douglas, J. M. The Interface between Design and Control. 1. Process Controllability. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1988, 27, 597-605.
40. Fisher, W. R.; Doherty, M. F.; Douglas, J. M. The Interface between Design and Control. 3. Selecting a Set of Controlled Variables. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 1988, 27, 611-615.
41. Newell, R.; Lee, P. Applied Process Control; Prentice Hall of Australia: Brookvale, NSW, 1988.
42. Ramirez, E.; Gani, R. A Systematic Approach for the Design and Analysis of Reaction-Separation Systems with Recycle. In European Symposium on Computer-Aided Process Engineering-14; Barbosa-Póvoa, A.; Matos, H., Eds.; Computer-Aided Chemical Engineering, 18; Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2004.
43. Gani, R.; O'Connel, J. P. Properties and CAPE: from present uses to future challenges. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2001, 25, 3-14.
44. Horn, F. Attainable and non-attainable regions in chemical reaction technique. In Proceedings of the 3rd European Symposium on Chemical Reaction Engineering; Pergamon Press: London, 1964.
45. Omtveit, T.; Wah, P.; Lien, K. Decomposed algorithmic synthesis of Reactor-Separation-Recycle Systems. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1994, 18, 1115-1124.
46. Hildebrandt, D.; McGregor, C.; Glasser, D. Process Synthesis for a Reactor-Separator-Recycle System using the Attainable Region Approach. Dev. Chem. Eng. Mineral Process. 1998, 6, 21-39.
47. Cavani, F.; Trifirò, F. Alternative processes for the production of styrene. Appl. Catal., A 1995, 133, 219-239.
48. Olah, G. Friedel - Crafts and Related Reactions; Wiley - Inter-science: New York, 1964.
49. Smith, E. M. Continuous Process Design Optimisation, Thesis, Imperial College of Science and Technology, London, 1996.
50. Kokossis, A.; Floudas, C A. Synthesis of Isothermal ReactorSeparator - Recycle Systems. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1991, 46, 1361-1383.
51. Smith, E.; Pantelides, C. C. Design of Reaction/Separation Networks using Detailed Models. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1995, 19, 83-88.
52. Jaksland, C. Separation Process Design and Synthesis Based on Thermodynamic Insights, Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark, 1996.
53. Bek-Pedersen, E. Synthesis and Design of Distillation based Separation Schemes, Ph.D. Thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark, 2003.
54. de Lera Alonso, C. Simulation and Optimization of Recycle Systems (Ethylbenzene Production), Master's Thesis, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark, 2000.
55. Provision User's Guide; Simulation Sciences, Inc., 1994.
56. Gani, R.; Cameron, I. T. Modelling for dynamic simulation of chemical processes-the index problem. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1992, 47, 1311-1315.
57. Hangos, K. M.; Cameron, I. T. The formal representation of process system modelling assumptions and their implications. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1997, 21, S823-S828.
58. Ramirez, E.; Gani, R. Methodology for the Design and Analysis of Reaction-Separation Systems with Recycle. 2. Design and Control Integration. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2007, 46, 8084-8100.