Infinitesimal model perturbation influence in the linear mixed model

South African Statistical Journal

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 105-126

  Zewotir, Temesgen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KWAZULU NATAL   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Case deletion; Cook's distance; Diagnostics; Influential observations; Perturbation

Indexed keywords

EID: 36749013754     PISSN: 0038271X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. AKAIKE, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control, AC-19: 716-723.
2. BECKMAN, R.J., NACHTSHEIM, C.J. and COOK, R.D. (1987). Diagnostics for mixed model analysis of variance. Technometrics 29: 413-426.
3. BELSLEY, D.A., KUH, E. and WELSCH, R.E. (1980). Regression diagnostics. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
4. BANERJEE, M. and FREES, E.W. (1997). Influence Diagnostics for Linear Longitudinal Models. Journal of the American Statistical Association 92: 999-1005.
5. CHRISTENSEN, R., PEARSON, L.M. and JOHNSON, W. (1992). Case-deletion diagnostics for mixed models. Technometrics 34: 38-45.
6. COOK, R.D. (1977). Detection of influential observations in linear regression. Technometrics 19: 15-18.
7. COOK, R.D. (1986). Assessment of local influence (with discussion). Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 48: 133-169.
8. COOK, R.D. and WEISBERG, S. (1982). Residual and influence in regression. London: Chapman and Hall.
9. COX, D.R. and HINKLEY, D.V. (1974). Theoretical statistics. London: Chapman and Hall.
10. FAN, J. and CHEN, J. (1999). One-step local quasi-likelihood estimation. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, series B 61: 927-943.
11. HARVILLE, D.A. (1977). Maximum likelihood approaches to variance component estimation and to related problems (with discussion). Journal of the American Statistical Association 72: 320-340.
12. HASLETT, J. and DILLANE, D. (2004). Application of 'delete=replace' to deletion diagnostics for variance component estimation in the linear mixed model. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society (B) 66: 131-143.
13. LAWRANCE, A.J. (1990). Local and deletion influence. In Directions in robust statistics and diagnostics, ed. W.A. Stahel and S. Weisberg, Part I, 141-157, New York: Springer-Verlag.
14. LESAFFRE E., and VERBEKE G. (1998). Local influence in linear mixed models. Biometrics 54: 570-582
15. McCULLOCH, C.E. and SEARLE, S.R. (2001). Generalized, linear and mixed models. New York: John Wiley.
16. OMAN, S.D. (1995). Checking the assumptions in mixed model analysis of variance: a residual analysis approach. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 20: 309-330.
17. PREGIBON, D. (1981). Logistic regression diagnostics. Annals of Statistics 9: 705-724.
18. ROBINSON, G.K. (1991). That BLUP is a good thing: The estimation of random effects (with discussion). Statistical Science 6: 15-51.
19. SAS Institute Inc. (1992). SAS Technical Report P-229. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
20. SEARLE, S.R., CASELLA, G. and McCULLOCH, C.E. (1992). Variance components. New York: John Wiley.
21. ZEWOTIR, T. and GALPIN, J.S. (2005). Influence diagnostics for linear mixed models. Journal of Data Science, 3: 153-177.
22. ZEWOTIR, T. and GALPIN, J.S. (2007). A Unified Approach on Residuals, Leverages and Outliers in the Linear Mixed Model. Test, 16: 58-75.