Using computational fluid dynamics to evaluate a novel venous cannula [Smath canula®] for use in cardiopulmonary bypass operating procedures

Perfusion

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 257-265

  Jegger, David ^a   Sundaram, S ^b   Shah, K ^b   Mallabiabarrena, I ^a   Mucciolo, G ^a   von Segesser, L K ^a  

^a Dept of Cardiovascular Surgery ^*  (Switzerland)

^b CFDRC Research Corporation   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; INTRAVENOUS CATHETER; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PRESSURE GRADIENT; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STEADY STATE; SURFACE PROPERTY; VASCULAR ACCESS; VEIN BLOOD FLOW; VEIN CATHETERIZATION; VEIN DIAMETER;

BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CARDIOPULMONARY BYPASS; CATHETERIZATION, PERIPHERAL; MATHEMATICS;

EID: 36749002678     PISSN: 02676591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0267659107083657     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. von Segesser LK, Jegger D, Mucciolo G, et al. The Smart Canula™: A new tool for remote access perfusion in limited access cardiac surgery. Heart Surg Forum 2005; 8: E241-5.
2. Jegger D, Tevaearai HT, Pierrel N, Horisberger J, Mueller X, von Segesser LK. Flow dynamic comparison of peripheral venous cannulae used with centrifugal pump assistance in vitro. Artif Org 2002; 26: 390-92.
3. Ciofalo M, Collins MW, Hennessy TR. Modelling nanoscale fluid dynamics and transport in physiological flows. Med Eng Phys 1996; 18: 437-51.
4. Boschetti F. Computer simulation of heart-lung bypass. In: Power H & Hart RT, ed. Computer simulations in biomedicine, Computational mechanics publications Springer Berlin 1995: 565-72.
5. de Wachter D. Extracorporeal systems. In: Verdonck P, ed. Intra and extracorporeal cardiovascular fluid dynamics: vol 1, WIT press, Southampton 1998: 101-51.
6. Siegel JM. Computational and experimental analysis of haemodialysis catheters. ASME BED 1998; 39: 133-4.
7. Hamlen C. Use of CFD in the design and optimisation of perfusion equipment. ASME BED-Advances in Bioengineering 1998; 39: 137.
8. Goodin MS, Thor EJ, Haworth WS. Use of CFD in the design of the Avecor affinity oxygenator. Perfusion 1994; 9: 217-22.
9. Grigioni M. A parametric model of cannula to investigate haemolysis by using CFD. Medical Physics 2000; 27: S1398.
10. Henry FS. Flow in stented arteries. In: Verdonck P, ed. Intra and extracorporeal cardiovascular fluid dynamics: vol 2, WIT press, Southampton 1998: 333-64.
11. Jegger D, Mueller XM, Mucciolo G, Boone Y, Seigneul I, Horisberger J, von Segesser LK. A new pediatric peripheral access venous cannula which changes shape in situ. Perfusion 2003; 18: 61-5.
12. Jegger D, Tevaearai H, Mueller X, et al. A new expandable cannula to increase venous return during peripheral access cpb surgery. Int J Artif Organs 2002; 25: 136-40.
13. Patankar V. Numerical heat transfer and fluid flow. McGraw-Hill, Maidenhead, Berkshire, 1980.
14. Zienkiewicz C, Taylor RL, Finite element methods. Volume 3: Fluid Dynamics, Butterworth-Heinemann, 2000.
15. Hirsch C, Numerical computation of internal and external flows, fundamentals of numerical discretization. Wiley Series in Numerical Methods in Engineering, 1989.
16. Ho LW and Patera AT. A Legendre spectral element method for simulation of unsteady incompressible viscous free-surface flows, Comp Meth Appl Mech. Eng. 80: 355-66; 1990.
17. Anonymous, CFD-ACE+ User's Manual, 2004, ESI North America, Huntsville, AL, USA. P 2.
18. Bedekar AS, Pant K, Ventikos Y and Sundaram S. A computational model combining vascular biology and haemodynamics for thrombosis prediction in anatomically accurate cerebral aneurysms, Trans IChemE Part C, Food and Bioproducts Processing, 83(C2): 118-26; 2005.
19. Arom KV, Ellestad C, Grover FL, Trinkle JK. Objective evaluation of the efficacy of various venous cannulas. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1981; 81: 464-69.
20. Bennett EV, Fewel JG, Ybarra J, Grover FL, Trinkle JK. Comparison of flow differences among venous cannulas. Ann Thorac Surg 1983; 36: 59-65.
21. Wenger RK, Bavaria JE, Ratcliffe MB, Bogen D, Edmunds LH. Flow dynamics of peripheral venous catheters during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with a centrifugal pump. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1988; 96: 478-84.
22. Delius RE, Montoya JP, Merz SI, et al. New method for describing the performance of cardiac surgery cannulas. Ann Thorac Surg 1992; 53: 278-81.
23. Jegger D, Tevaearai HT, Horisberger J, et al. Augmented venous return for minimally invasive open heart surgery with selective caval cannulation. Eur J Cardio Thor Surg 1999; 16: 312-16.
24. Kurusz M, Deyo DJ, Sholar AD, Tao W, Zwischenberger JB. Laboratory testing of femoral venous cannulae: effect of size, position and negative pressure on flow. Perfusion 1999; 14: 379-87.
25. Kugai T, Koja K, Kusaba A. An in vitro evaluation of venous cannula in a simulated partial (femoro-femoral) cardiopulmonary bypass circuit. Artif Organs 1995; 19: 154-60.
26. Konig CS. Investigation of unsteady flow in a model of a ventricular assist device by numerical modelling and comparison with experiment. Medical engineering and physics 1999; 21: 53-64.
27. Cebeci T, Modelling and computation of boundary layer flows. Springer 1999.
28. Segers P. Biomechanical aspects of intracoronary stents. In: Verdonck P, ed. Intra and extracorporeal cardiovascular fluid dynamics: vol 2, WIT press, Southampton 1998: 203-232.