Evaluation of whole genome amplification protocols for array and oligonucleotide CGH

Diagnostic Molecular Pathology

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 198-206

  Hittelman, Adam ^a   Sridharan, Shivaranjani ^a   Roy, Ritu ^a   Fridlyand, Jane ^a   Loda, Massimo ^b   Collins, Colin ^a,c   Paris, Pamela L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

aCGH; oCGH; Whole genome amplification

Indexed keywords

FORMALDEHYDE; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE; PARAFFIN;

ARTICLE; BIOPSY; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE GENOMIC HYBRIDIZATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENOMICS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

FEMALE; GENOME, HUMAN; HUMANS; MALE; NUCLEIC ACID AMPLIFICATION TECHNIQUES; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; OLIGONUCLEOTIDES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 36649029778     PISSN: 10529551     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PDM.0b013e3180f62ad5     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Lillington DM, Kingston JE, Coen PG, et al. Comparative genomic hybridization of 49 primary retinoblastoma tumors identifies chromosomal regions associated with histopathology, progression, and patient outcome. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2003;36:121-128.
2. Myllykangas S, Himberg J, Bohling T, et al. DNA copy number amplification profiling of human neoplasms. Oncogene. 2006;25:7324-7332.
3. Paris PL, Andaya A, Fridlyand J, et al. Whole genome scanning identifies genotypes associated with recurrence and metastasis in prostate tumors. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13:1303-1313.
4. Paris PL, Weinberg V, Simko J, et al. Preliminary evaluation of prostate cancer metastatic risk biomarkers. Int J Biol Markers. 2005;20:141-145.
5. Vandesompele J, Baudis M, De Preter K, et al. Unequivocal delineation of clinicogenetic subgroups and development of a new model for improved outcome prediction in neuroblastoma. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:2280-2299.
6. Pinkel D, Segraves R, Sudar D, et al. High resolution analysis of DNA copy number variation using comparative genomic hybridization to microarrays. Nat Genet. 1998;20:207-211.
7. Paris PL, Albertson DG, Alers JC, et al. High-resolution analysis of paraffin-embedded and formalin-fixed prostate tumors using comparative genomic hybridization to genomic microarrays. Am J Pathol. 2003;162:763-770.
8. Devries S, Nyante S, Korkola J, et al. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded breast tumors. J Mol Diagn. 2005;7:65-71.
9. Simone NL, Bonner RF, Gillespie JW, et al. Laser-capture microdissection: opening the microscopic frontier to molecular analysis. Trends Genet. 1998;14:272-276.
10. Lewis F, Maughan NJ, Smith V, et al. Unlocking the archive - gene expression in paraffin-embedded tissue. J Pathol. 2001;195:66-71.
11. Cheung VG, Nelson SF. Whole genome amplification using a degenerate oligonucleotide primer allows hundreds of genotypes to be performed on less than one nanogram of genomic DNA. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:14676-14679.
12. Dean FB, Hosono S, Fang L, et al. Comprehensive human genome amplification using multiple displacement amplification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99:5261-5266.
13. Lage JM, Leamon JH, Pejovic T, et al. Whole genome analysis of genetic alterations in small DNA samples using hyperbranched strand displacement amplification and array-CGH. Genome Res. 2003;13:294-307.
14. Zhang L, Cui X, Schmitt K, et al. Whole genome amplification from a single cell: implications for genetic analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1992;89:5847-5851.
15. Pirker C, Raidl M, Steiner E, et al. Whole genome amplification for CGH analysis: Linker-adapter PCR as the method of choice for difficult and limited samples. Cytometry A. 2004;61:26-34.
16. Wang G, Brennan C, Rook M, et al. Balanced-PCR amplification allows unbiased identification of genomic copy changes in minute cell and tissue samples. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32:e76.
17. Bredel M, Bredel C, Juric D, et al. Amplification of whole tumor genomes and gene-by-gene mapping of genomic aberrations from limited sources of fresh-frozen and paraffin-embedded DNA. J Mol Diagn. 2005;7:171-182.
18. Leviel K, Olarte M, Sullivan PF. Genotyping accuracy for whole-genome amplification of DNA from buccal epithelial cells. Twin Res. 2004;7:482-484.
19. Wang G, Maher E, Brennan C, et al. DNA amplification method tolerant to sample degradation. Genome Res. 2004;14:2357-2366.
20. Gentleman R, Carey V, Dudoit S, et al. Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Solutions Using R and Bioconductor. New York: Springer; 2005.
21. Team RDC. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2005.
22. Bernardino J, Bourgeois CA, Muleris M, et al. Characterization of chromosome changes in two human prostatic carcinoma cell lines (PC-3 and DU145) using chromosome painting and comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1997;96:123-128.
23. Nupponen NN, Hyytinen ER, Kallioniemi AH, et al. Genetic alterations in prostate cancer cell lines detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Genet Cytogenet. 1998;101:53-57.
24. Olshen AB, Venkatraman ES, Lucito R, et al. Circular binary segmentation for the analysis of array-based DNA copy number data. Biostatistics. 2004;5:557-572.
25. Strohmeyer DM, Berger AP, Moore DH II, et al. Genetic aberrations in prostate carcinoma detected by comparative genomic hybridization and microsatellite analysis: association with progression and angiogenesis. Prostate. 2004;59:43-58.
26. Visakorpi T, Kallioniemi AH, Syvanen AC, et al. Genetic changes in primary and recurrent prostate cancer by comparative genomic hybridization. Cancer Res. 1995;55:342-347.
27. van Dekken H, Paris PL, Albertson DG, et al. Evaluation of genetic patterns in different tumor areas of intermediate-grade prostatic adenocarcinomas by high-resolution genomic array analysis. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2004;39:249-256.
28. Little SE, Vuononvirta R, Reis-Filho JS, et al. Array CGH using whole genome amplification of fresh-frozen and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor DNA. Genomics. 2006;87:298-306.
29. Lieu PT, Jozsi P, Gilles P, et al. Development of a DNA-labeling system for array-based comparative genomic hybridization. J Biomol Tech. 2005;16:104-111.
30. Huang Q, Schantz SP, Rao PH, et al. Improving degenerate oligonucleotide primed PCR-comparative genomic hybridization for analysis of DNA copy number changes in tumors. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2000;28:395-403.
31. Snijders AM, Nowak N, Segraves R, et al. Assembly of microarrays for genome-wide measurement of DNA copy number. Nat Genet. 2001;29:263-264.