Dietary monoterpene concentrations influence feeding patterns of lambs

Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Volumn 109, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 49-57

  Dziba, L E ^a   Provenza, F D ^a  

^a UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Feeding bouts; Food intake; Intake regulation; Monoterpenes; Sagebrush; Sheep

Indexed keywords

DIET; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FOOD INTAKE; HERBIVORE; MONOTERPENE; SHEEP; TOXICITY;

ARTEMISIA TRIDENTATA; MEDICAGO SATIVA; OVIS ARIES;

EID: 36649027115     PISSN: 01681591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.applanim.2007.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Altman J. Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behavior 49 (1974) 227-265
2. Aoude A., and Danvir R. Using range manipulations to increase pronghorn carrying capacity. Proceedings of the Pronghorn Antelope Workshop, vol. 20 (2002) 124-135
3. Bork E.W., West N.E., and Walker J.W. Cover components on long-term seasonal sheep grazing treatments in three-tip sagebrush steppe. J. Range Manage. 51 (1998) 293-300
4. Bray R.O., Wambolt C.L., and Kelsey R.G. Influence of sagebrush terpenoids on mule deer preference. J. Chem. Ecol. 17 (1991) 2053-2062
5. Bryant J.P., Provenza F.D., Pastor J., Reichardt P.B., Clausen T.P., and du Toit J.T. Interactions between woody plants and browsing mammals mediated by secondary metabolites. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 22 (1991) 431-446
6. Cheeke P.R. Natural Toxicants in Feeds, Forages, and Poisonous Plants. 2nd ed. (1998), Interstate, Danville, IL
7. Cluff L.K., Welch B.L., Pederson J.C., and Brotherson J.D. Concentration of sagebrush monoterpenes in the rumen ingesta of wild mule deer. J. Range Manage. 35 (1982) 192-194
8. Danvir, R., 2000. Sage grouse ecology and management in northern Utah sagebrush-steppe. Deseret Land & Livestock Foundation for Quality Resource Management Research Report. Woodruff, UT.
9. Dziba L.E., Hall J.O., and Provenza F.D. Feeding behavior of lambs in relation to kinetics of 1,8-cineole dosed intravenously and into the rumen. J. Chem. Ecol. 32 (2006) 391-408
10. Dziba, L.E., Provenza, F.D., Villalba, J.J., Atwood, S.B., 2006b. Supplemental energy and protein increase use of sagebrush by sheep. Small Rumin. Res. (available online, 11 July).
11. Foley W.J., Lassak E.V., and Brophy J.J. Digestion and absorption of Eucalyptus essential oils in greater glider (Petauroides volans) and brushtail possum (Trichosurus vulpecula). J. Chem. Ecol. 13 (1987) 2115-2130
12. Foley W.J., Iason G.R., and McArthur C. Role of plant secondary metabolites in the nutritional ecology of mammalian herbivores: how far have we come in 25 years?. In: Jung H.G., and Fahey Jr. G.C. (Eds). Nutritional Ecology of Herbivores. Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Herbivore Nutrition, Am. Soc. Anim. Sci. Savoy, IL (1999)
13. Freeland W.J., and Janzen D.H. Strategies in herbivory by mammals: the role of plant secondary compounds. Am. Nat. 108 (1974) 269-287
14. Gugliemo C.G., and Karasov W.H. Nutritional costs of a plant secondary metabolite explain selective foraging by Ruffed Grouse. Ecology 77 (1996) 1103-1115
15. Illius A.W., and Jessop N.S. Modeling animal responses to plant toxins. In: Felix D'Mello J.P. (Ed). Handbook of Plant and Fungal Toxicants (1997), CRC Press, NY
16. Jakubas W.J., Karasov W.H., and Gugliemo C.G. Ruffed grouse tolerance and biotransformation of the plant secondary metabolite coniferyl benzoate. Condor 95 (1993) 625-640
17. Johnson A.E., James L.F., and Spillet J. The abortifacient and toxic effects of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata) and juniper (Juniperus osteosperma) on domestic sheep. J. Range Manage. 29 (1976) 278-280
18. Kelsey R.G., Stephens J.R., and Shafizadeh F. The chemical constituents of sagebrush foliage and their isolation. J. Range Manage. 35 (1982) 617-622
19. Launchbaugh K.L., and Provenza F.D. The effect of flavor intensity and toxin dose on the formation and generalization of flavor aversions in sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 72 (1994) 10-13
20. 3 receptor antagonist increases the intake of diets containing Eucalyptus secondary metabolites by marsupials. J. Comp. Physiol. B 168 (1998) 611-618
21. Lehner P.N. Handbook of Ethological Methods. 2nd ed. (1996), Cambridge University Press, New York, NY
22. Littell R.C., Milliken G.A., Struop W.W., and Woulfinger R.B. SAS System for Mixed Models (1996), SAS Inst., Cary, NC
23. Meyer M.W., and Karasov W.H. Chemical aspects of herbivory in arid and semiarid habitats. In: Palo R.T., and Robbins C.T. (Eds). Plant Defenses against Mammalian Herbivory (1991), CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
24. Nagy J.G., Steinhoff H.W., and Ward G.M. Effects of essential oils of sagebrush on deer rumen microbial function. J. Wildl. Manage. 28 (1964) 785-790
25. National Research Council. Nutrient Requirements of Sheep. 6th ed. (1985), National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC
26. Ngugi R.K., Hinds F.C., and Powell J. Mountain big sagebrush browse decreases dry matter intake, digestibility and nutritive quality of sheep diets. J. Range Manage. 48 (1995) 487-492
27. Oh H.K., Jones M.B., and Longhurst W.M. Comparison of rumen microbial inhibition resulting from various essential oils isolated from relatively unpalatable plants. Appl. Microbiol. 16 (1968) 39-44
28. Palmer S.C.F., Hester A.J., Elston D.A., Gordon I.J., and Hartley S.E. The perils of having tasty neighbors: grazing impacts of large herbivores at vegetation boundaries. Ecology 84 (2003) 2877-2890
29. Personius T.L., Wambolt C.L., Stephens J.R., and Kelsey R.G. Crude terpenoid influence on mule deer preference for sagebrush. J. Range Manage. 40 (1987) 84-88
30. Pfister J.A., Provenza F.D., Manners G.D., Gardner D.R., and Ralphs M.H. Tall larkspur ingestion: can cattle regulate intake below toxic levels. J. Chem. Ecol. 23 (1997) 759-777
31. Provenza F.D. Postingestive feedback as an elementary determinant of food preference and intake in ruminants. J. Range Manage. 48 (1995) 2-17
32. Provenza F.D. Acquired aversions as the basis for varied diets of ruminants foraging on rangelands. J. Anim. Sci. 74 (1996) 2010-2020
33. Provenza F.D., Pfister J.A., and Cheney C.D. Mechanisms of learning in diet selection with reference to phytotoxicosis in herbivores. J. Range Manage. 45 (1992) 36-45
34. Provenza F.D., Villalba J.J., Dziba L.E., Atwood S.B., and Banner R.E. Linking herbivore experience, varied diets, and plant biochemical diversity. Small Rumin. Res. 49 (2003) 257-274
35. Sorensen J.S., Heward E., and Dearing M.D. Plant secondary metabolites alter the feeding patterns of a mammalian herbivore (Neotoma lepida). Oecologia 146 (2005) 415-422
36. Stapley J., Foley W.J., Cunningham R., and Eschler B. How well can common brushtail possums regulate their intake of Eucalyptus toxins?. J. Comp. Physiol. B 170 (2000) 211-218
37. Villalba J.J., Provenza F.D., and Banner R.E. Influence of macronutrients and medicines on utilization of toxin-containing foods by sheep and goats. I. Responses to sagebrush. J. Anim. Sci. 80 (2002) 2099-2109
38. Weidenhamer J.D., Macias F.A., Fischer N.H., and Williamson G.B. Just how insoluble are monoterpenes?. J. Chem. Ecol. 19 (1993) 1799-1807
39. Welch B.L., and Pederson J.C. In vitro digestibility among accessions of big sagebrush by wild mule deer and its relationship to monoterpene content. J. Range Manage. 34 (1981) 497-500
40. Welch B.L., McArthur D., and Davis J.N. Mule deer preference and monoterpenoids (essential oils). J. Range Manage. 36 (1983) 485-487
41. White S.M., Flinders J.T., and Welch B.L. Preference of pygmy rabbits (Brachylagus idahoensis) for various populations of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentate). J. Range Manage. 35 (1982) 724-726
42. Wiggins N.L., McArthur C., McLean S., and Boyle R. Effects of two plant secondary metabolites, cineole and gallic acid, on nightly feeding patterns of the common brushtail possum. J. Chem. Ecol. 29 (2003) 1447-1464