Interesting problems and interesting research: A path to effective exchanges between managers and scholars

Business Horizons

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 65-71

  Ireland, R Duane ^a   Ketchen Jr , David J ^b  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Evidence based management; Knowledge management; Management scholarship

Indexed keywords

EID: 36649026444     PISSN: 00076813     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bushor.2007.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Baldridge D.C., Floyd S.W., and Markoczy L. Are managers from Mars and academicians from Venus? Toward an understanding of the relationship between academic quality and practical relevance. Strategic Management Journal 25 11 (2004) 1063-1074
2. Barley S.R. When I write my masterpiece: Thoughts on what makes a paper interesting. Academy of Management Journal 49 1 (2006) 16-20
3. Bartunek J.M., Rynes S.L., and Ireland R.D. What makes management research interesting, and why does it matter?. Academy of Management Journal 49 1 (2006) 9-15
4. Boyer E.L. Scholarship reconsidered: Priorities of the professoriate. (1990), The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching, Princeton, NJ
5. Business Horizons. Description (2007). http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620214/description#description Retrieved from http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620214/description#description
6. Davis M.S. Aphorisms and clichés: The generalization and dissipation of conceptual charisma. In: Hagan J., and Cook K. (Eds). Annual Review of Sociology 25 (1999) 245-269
7. Donaldson L. Damned by our own theories: Contradictions between theories and management education. Academy of Learning & Education 1 1 (2002) 96-106
8. Dutton J.E., and Dukerich J.M. The relational foundation of research: An underappreciated dimension of interesting research. Academy of Management Journal 49 1 (2006) 21-26
9. Ghoshal S. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Learning & Education 4 1 (2005) 75-91
10. Hambrick D.C. Just how bad are our theories? A response to Ghoshal. Academy of Management Learning & Education 4 1 (2005) 104-107
11. Hodgkinson G.P. Editorial. British Journal of Management 12 1 (2001) 1
12. Huff A.S., and Huff J.O. Re-focusing the business school agenda. British Journal of Management 12 1 (2001) S49-S54
13. Ireland, R. D., & Webb, J. W. (in press). A cross-disciplinary exploration of entrepreneurship research. Journal of Management.
14. Kanter R.M. What theories do audiences want? Exploring the demand side. Academy of Management Learning & Education 4 1 (2005) 93-95
15. Klimoski R. Introduction: Physician heal thyself. Academy of Management Learning & Education 6 1 (2007) 81-83
16. Pettigrew A.M. Management research after modernism. British Journal of Management 12 1 (2001) S61-S70
17. Pfeffer J., and Fong C.T. The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye. Academy of Learning & Education 1 1 (2002) 79-95
18. Pfeffer J., and Sutton R.I. Hard facts, dangerous half-truths, and total nonsense. (2006), Harvard Business School Publishing, Boston
19. Rousseau D.M., and McCarthy S. Educating managers from an evidence-based perspective. Academy of Management Learning & Education 6 1 (2007) 84-101
20. Upson J., Ketchen D., and Ireland R.D. Managing employee stress: A key to the effectiveness of strategic supply chain management. Organizational Dynamics 36 1 (2007) 78-92
21. Weick K.E. Gapping the relevance bridge: Fashions meet fundamentals in management research. British Journal of Management 12 1 (2001) S71-S76