Recreational fishing site choice models: Insights and future opportunities

Human Dimensions of Wildlife

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 153-172

  Hunt, Len M ^a  

^a ONTARIO MINISTRY OF NATURAL RESOURCES   (Canada)

Author keywords

Choice modeling; Participation; Recreational fishing; Review; Site choice; Site substitution

Indexed keywords

EID: 36649014568     PISSN: 10871209     EISSN: 1533158X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10871200591003409     Document Type: Article

References (79)

1. Aas, O., Haider, W., and Hunt, L. M. 2000. Angler responses to potential harvest regulations in Engerdal, Norway:A conjoint based choice modeling approach. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 20:940–950. [CSA]
2. Adamowicz, W. L., 1994. Habit formation and variety seeking in a discrete choice model of recreation demand. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 19 (1):19–31.
3. Adamowicz, W.L., Louviere, J.J., and Williams, M. 1994. Combining stated and revealed preference methods for valuing environmental amenities. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 26:271–292. [CROSSREF]
4. Banzhaf, M. R., Johnson, F. R., and Mathews, K.E. 2001. “ Opt-out alternatives and anglers’ stated preferences ”. In The choice modelling approach to environmental valuation, Edited by:Bennett, J., and Blamey, R., 157–177. Northampton, MA:Edward Elgar.
5. Ben-Akiva, M. E., and Lerman, S. R., 1985. Discrete choice analysis:Theory and application to travel demand, Cambridge, MA:MIT Press.
6. Ben-Akiva, M. E., and Morikawa, T., 1990. Estimation of switching models from revealed preferences and stated intentions. Transportation Research, Part A, 24 (6):485–495. [CROSSREF]
7. Bockstael, N. E., Hanemann, W. M., and Kling, C.L. 1987. Estimating the value of water quality improvements in a recreation demand framework. Water Resources Research, 23 (5):951–960.
8. Bockstael, N. E., McConnell, K. E., and Strand, I.E. 1989. A random utility model for sportfishing:Some preliminary results for Florida. Marine Resource Economics, 6:245–260. [CSA]
9. Breffle, W. S., and Morey, E. R., 2000. Investigating preference heterogeneity in a repeated discrete choice recreation demand model of Atlantic Salmon fishing. Marine Resource Economics, 15 (1):1–20.
10. Bryan, H., 1977. Leisure value systems and recreational specialization:The case of trout fishermen. Journal of Leisure Research, 9:174–187. [CSA]
11. Cessario, F. J., 1973. A generalized trip distribution model. Journal of Regional Sciences, 13:233–247. [CSA]
12. Chen, H. Z., and Cosslett, S. R., 1998. Environmental quality preference and benefit estimation in multinomial probit models:A simulation approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80:512–520.
13. Creel, M., and Loomis, J., 1992. Recreation value of water to wetlands in the San Joaquin Valley:linked multinomial logit and count data trip frequency models. Water Resources Research, 28 (10):2597–2606. [CROSSREF]
14. Domencich, T. A., and McFadden, D., 1975. Urban travel demand:A behavioral analysis:A Charles River Associates research study, Amsterdam, Netherlands:North-Holland Publishing. (Contributions to economic analysis No. 93)
15. Feather, P. M., 1994. Sampling and aggregation issues in random utility model estimation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76:772–780.
16. Feather, P. M., Hellerstein, D., and Tomasi, T. 1995. A discrete-count model of recreational demand. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29:214–227. [CROSSREF]
17. Feenberg, D., and Mills, E. S., 1980. Measuring the benefits of water pollution abatement, New York:Academic Press.
18. Fotheringham, A. S., 1981. Spatial structure and distance decay parameters. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 71 (3):425–436.
19. Fotheringham, A. S., 1986. Modelling hierarchical destination choice. Environment and Planning A, 18:401–418.
20. Freund, R. J., and Wilson, R. R., 1973. An example of the gravity model to estimate recreation travel. Journal of Leisure Research, 6:241–256. [CSA]
21. Greene, G., Moss, C. B., and Spreen, T. H. 1997. Demand for recreational fishing in Tampa Bay, Florida:A random utility approach. Marine Resource Economics, 12:293–305. [CSA]
22. Hauber, A. B., and Parsons, G. R., 2000. The effect of nesting structure specification on welfare estimation in a random utility model of recreation demand:An application to the demand for recreational fishing. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 82:501–514. [CROSSREF]
23. Hausman, J. A., Leonard, G. K., and McFadden, D. 1995. A utility-consistent, combined discrete choice and count data model:Assessing recreational losses due to natural resource damage. Journal of Public Economics, 56:1–30. [CSA][CROSSREF]
24. Hunt, L. M., Boots, B. N., and Kanaroglou, P., 2004. Spatial choice modelling:New opportunities to incorporate space into substitution patterns. Progress in Human Geography, 28(6)
25. Jakus, P. M., Dadakas, D., and Fly, J.M. 1998. Fish consumption advisories:Incorporating angler-specific knowledge, habits, and catch rates in a site choice model. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80 (5):1019–1024.
26. Jakus, P. M., Downing, M., Bevelhimer, M. S., and Fly, J.M. 1997. Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 26 (2):196–204.
27. Jakus, P. M., and Shaw, W. D., 2003. Perceived hazard and product choice:An application to recreational site choice. The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 26 (1):77–92. [CROSSREF]
28. Jones, C. A., and Lupi, F., 1999. The effect of modeling substitute activities on recreational benefit estimates. Marine Resource Economics, 14:357–374.
29. Kaoru, Y., 1995. Measuring marine recreation benefits of water quality improvements by the nested random utility model. Resource and Energy Economics, 17:119–136. [CROSSREF]
30. Kaoru, Y., Smith, V. K., and Liu, J.L. 1995. Using random utility models to estimate the recreational value of estuarine resources. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 77:141–151.
31. Kling, C. L., and Thomson, C. J., 1996. The implications of model specification for welfare estimation in nested logit models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 78:103–114.
32. Lester, N. P., Marshall, T. R., Armstrong, K., Dunlop, W. I., and Ritchie, B. 2003. A broad scale approach to management of Ontario’s recreational fisheries. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 23 (4):1312–1328. [CSA][CROSSREF]
33. Lin, P., Adams, R. M., and Berrens, R.P. 1996. Welfare effects of fishery policies:Native American treaty rights and recreational salmon fishing. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 21 (2):263–276. [CSA]
34. Lupi, F., and Feather, P. M., 1998. Using partial site aggregation to reduce bias in random utility travel cost models. Water Resources Research, 34 (12):3595–3603. [CROSSREF]
35. MacNair, D.J., and Cox, S.D., 1999. A heteroscedastic nested RUM of freshwater fishing. Marine Resource Economics, 14:333–341.
36. Manski, C.F., 1977. The structure of random utility models. Theory and Decision, 8:229–254. [CSA][CROSSREF]
37. Martinson, K., and Shelby, B., 1992. Encounter and proximity norms for salmon anglers in California and New Zealand. North American Journal of Fisheries Management, 12:559–567. [CSA][CROSSREF]
38. McConnell, K. E., Strand, I. E., and Blake-Hedges, L. 1995. Random utility models of recreational fishing:Catching fish using a Poisson process. Marine Resource Economics, 10:247–261. [CSA]
39. McConnell, K. E., and Tseng, W., 1999. Some preliminary evidence on sampling of alternatives with random parameters logit. Marine Resource Economics, 14:317–332.
40. McFadden, D., 1974. “ Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior ”. In Frontiers in econometrics, Edited by:Zarembka, P., 105–142. New York:Academic Press.
41. McFadden, D., 2000. Disaggregate behavioral travel demand’s RUM side. A 30-year perspective March 2000 at the International Association for Travel Behavior (IATB) Conference. July2-72000, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
42. Meyer, R. J., 1980. A descriptive model of constrained residential search. Geographical Analysis, 12 (1):21–32.
43. Milon, J. W., 1988a. A nested demand shares model of artificial marine habitat choice by sport anglers. Marine Resource Economics, 5:191–213. [CSA]
44. Milon, J. W., 1988b. Travel cost methods for estimating the recreational use benefits of artificial marine habitat. Southern Journal of Agricultural Economics, 20 (1):87–101.
45. Moeller, G. H., and Engelken, J. H., 1972. What fishermen look for in a fishing experience. Journal of Wildlife Management, 36 (4):1253–1257. [CSA]
46. Montgomery, M., and Needleman, M. S., 1997. The welfare effects of toxic contamination in freshwater fish. Land Economics, 73 (2):211–223. [CSA]
47. Morey, E. R., 1981. The demand for site-specific recreational activities:A characteristics approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 8:345–371. [CROSSREF]
48. Morey, E. R., Breffle, W. S., Rowe, R. D., and Waldman, D.M. 2002. Estimating recreational trout fishing damages in Montana’s Clark Fork River basin:Summary of a natural resource damage assessment. Journal of Environmental Management, 66:159–170. [PUBMED][INFOTRIEVE][CROSSREF]
49. Morey, E. R., Rowe, R. D., and Watson, M. 1993. A repeated nested-logit model of Atlantic salmon fishing. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 75:578–592. [CSA]
50. Morey, E. R., Shaw, W. D., and Rowe, R.D. 1991. A discrete-choice model of recreational participation, site choice, and activity valuation when complete trip data are not available. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 20:181–201. [CROSSREF]
51. Morey, E. R., and Waldman, D. M., 1998. Measurement error in recreation demand models:The joint estimation of participation, site choice, and site characteristics. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 35:262–276. [CROSSREF]
52. Ok, C. O., Ditton, R. B., Gentner, B., and Riechers, R., forthcoming. A stated preference choice approach to understanding angler preferences for management options. Human Dimensions of Wildlife
53. Parsons, G. R., and Hauber, A. B., 1998. Spatial boundaries and choice set definition in a random utility model of recreation demand. Land Economics, 74 (1):32–48.
54. Parsons, G. R., Jakus, P. M., and Tomasi, T. 1999a. A comparison of welfare estimates from four models for linking seasonal recreational trips to multinomial logit models of site choice. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 38:143–157. [CROSSREF]
55. Parsons, G. R., and Kealy, M. J., 1992. Randomly drawn opportunity sets in a random utility model of lake recreation. Land Economics, 68 (1):93–106.
56. Parsons, G. R., and Kealy, M. J., 1994. Benefits transfer in a random utility model of recreation. Water Resources Research, 30 (8):2477–2484. [CROSSREF]
57. Parsons, G. R., Massey, D. M., and Tomasi, T. 1999b. Familiar and favorite sites in a random utility model of beach recreation. Marine Resource Economics, 14:299–315.
58. Parsons, G. R., and Needleman, M. S., 1992. Site aggregation in a random utility model of recreation. Land Economics, 68 (4):418–433.
59. Parsons, G. R., Plantinga, A. J., and Boyle, K.J. 2000. Narrow choice sets in a random utility model of recreation demand. Land Economics, 76 (1):86–99.
60. Pendelton, L. H., and Mendelsohn, R., 1998. Estimating the economic impact of climate change on the freshwater sportfisheries of the northeastern U.S. Land Economics, 74 (4):483–496. [CSA]
61. Perdue, R. R., 1993. External information search in marine recreational fishing. Leisure Sciences, 15:169–187.
62. Peters, T., Adamowicz, W.L., and Boxall, P.C. 1995. Influence of choice set considerations in modeling the benefits from improved water quality. Water Resources Research, 31 (7):1781–1787. [CROSSREF]
63. Peterson, G. L., Anderson, D. H., and Lime, D.W. 1982. Multiple-use site demand analysis:An application to the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness. Journal of Leisure Research, 14:27–36. [CSA]
64. Phaneuf, D. J., Kling, C. L., and Herriges, J.A. 1998. Valuing water quality improvements using revealed preference methods when corner solutions are present. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80 (5):1025–1031.
65. Provencher, W., Baerenklau, K. A., and Bishop, R.C. 2002. A finite mixture logit model of recreational angling with serially correlated random utility. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84 (4):1066–1075. [CROSSREF]
66. Schuhmann, P. W., and Schwabe, K. A., 2004. An analysis of congestion measures and heterogeneous angler preferences in a random utility model of recreational fishing. Environmental and Resource Economics, 27:429–450. [CROSSREF]
67. Shafer, E., Jr. 1969. The average camper who doesn’t exist, Upper Darby, PA:US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Forest Experiment Station. (Research Paper NE-142)
68. Shaw, W. D., and Ozog, M. T., 1999. Modeling overnight recreation trip choice:Application of a repeated nested multinomial logit model. Environmental and Resource Economics, 13:397–414. [CSA][CROSSREF]
69. Shelby, B., and Vaske, J. J., 1991. Resource and activity substitutes for recreational salmon fishing in New Zealand. Leisure Sciences, 13:21–32.
70. Siemer, W. F., and Brown, T. L., 1994. Motivations and satisfactions of Lake Ontario boating salmonid anglers. Journal of Great Lakes Research, 20 (2):457–470. [CSA]
71. Swait, J. F., 1994. A structural equation model of latent segmentation and product choice for cross-sectional revealed preference choice data. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 1 (2):77–89. [CROSSREF]
72. Swait, J. F., Adamowicz, W. L., and van Bueren, M., 2004. Choice and temporal welfare impacts:Incorporating history into discrete choice models. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 47 (1):94–116. [CROSSREF]
73. Tay, R. S., and McCarthy, P. S., 1994. Benefits of improved water quality:A discrete choice analysis of freshwater recreational demands. Environment and Planning A, 26:1625–1638.
74. Tay, R. S., McCarthy, P. S., and Fletcher, J.J. 1996. A portfolio choice model of the demand for recreational trips. Transportation Research, Part A, 30 (5):325–337. [CROSSREF]
75. Train, K. E., 1998. Recreation demand models with taste differences over people. Land Economics, 74 (2):230–239.
76. Train, K. E., 2003. Discrete choice methods with simulation, New York:Cambridge University Press.
77. Watson, D. O., Adamowicz, W. L., and Boxall, P.C. 1994. An economic analysis of recreational fishing and environmental quality changes in the upper Oldman River. Canadian Water Resources Journal, 19 (3):203–225.
78. Whitehead, J. C., and Haab, T. C., 1999. Southeast marine recreational fishery statistical survey:Distance and catch based choice sets. Marine Resource Economics, 14:283–298.
79. Williams, D. R., Patterson, M. E., and Roggenbuck, J.W. 1992. Beyond the commodity metaphor:Examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place. Leisure Sciences, 14 (1):29–46.