Crown retention and flexural strength of eight provisional cements

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 98, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 455-460

  Lawson, Nathaniel C ^a   Burgess, John O ^a   Mercante, Donald ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMIUM DERIVATIVE; DENTAL ALLOY; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; REXILLIUM III; TOOTH CEMENT; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ZINC OXIDE; ZINC OXIDE NON EUGENOL CEMENT; ZINC OXIDE-NON-EUGENOL CEMENT;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTIN; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MATERIALS TESTING; MECHANICAL STRESS; PLIABILITY; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

CHROMIUM ALLOYS; COMPOSITE RESINS; CROWNS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS RETENTION; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; DENTIN; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; PLIABILITY; RESIN CEMENTS; STRESS, MECHANICAL; TENSILE STRENGTH; ZINC OXIDE;

EID: 36549090025     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60145-0     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ramp M., Dixon D., Ramp L., Breeding L., and Barber L. Tensile bond strengths of provisional luting agents used with an implant system. J Prosthet Dent 81 (1999) 510-514
2. Uy J., Lian J., Nicholls J., and Tan K. Load-fatigue performance of gold crowns luted with resin cements. J Prosthet Dent 95 (2006) 315-322
3. Junge T., Nicholls J., Phillips K., and Libman W. Load fatigue of compromised teeth: a comparison of 3 luting cements. Int J Prosthodont 11 (1998) 558-564
4. Kim Y., Yamashita J., Shotwell J., Chong K., and Wang H. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns. J Prosthet Dent 95 (2006) 450-455
5. Lepe X., Bales D., and Johnson G. Retention of provisional crowns fabricated from two materials with the use of four temporary cements. J Prosthet Dent 81 (1999) 469-475
6. Sakaguchi R. Craig's restorative dental materials. 12th ed (2006), Elsevier, St. Louis 632
7. el-Mowafy O., Fenton A., Forrester N., and Milenkovic M. Retention of metal ceramic crowns cemented with resin cements: effects of preparation taper and height. J Prosthet Dent 76 (1996) 524-529
8. Bresciano M., Schierano G., Manzella C., Screti A., Bignardi C., and Preti G. Retention of luting agents on implant abutments of different height and taper. Clin Oral Implants Res 16 (2005) 594-598
9. Bernal G., Okamura M., and Munoz C. The effects of abutment taper, length and cement type on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant supported restorations. J Prosthodont 12 (2003) 111-115
10. Jorgensen K. The relationship between retention and convergence angle in cemented veneer crowns. Acta Odontal Scand 13 (1955) 35-40
11. Rosenstiel S., Land M., and Crispin B. Dental luting agents: A review of the current literature. J Prosthet Dent 80 (1998) 280-301
12. Nordlander J., Weir D., Stoffer W., and Ochi S. The taper of clinical preparations for fixed prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 60 (1988) 148-151
13. Blair F., Wassell R., and Steele J. Crowns and other extra-coronal restorations: preparations for full veneer crowns. Br Dent J 192 (2002) 561-564 567-71.
14. el-Ebrashi M., Craig R., and Peyton F. Experimental stress analysis of dental restorations. 3. The concept of the geometry of proximal margins. J Prosthet Dent 22 (1969) 333-345
15. Palacios R., Johnson G., Phillips K., and Raigrodski A. Retention of zirconium oxide ceramic crowns with three types of cement. J Prosthet Dent 96 (2006) 104-114
16. Olin P., Rudney J., and Hill E. Retentive strength of six temporary dental cements. Quintessence Int 21 (1990) 197-200
17. Paige H., Hirsch S., and Gelb M. Effects of temporary cements on crown-to-composite resin core bond strength. J Prosthet Dent 55 (1986) 49-52
18. Dilts W., Miller R., Miranda F., and Duncanson Jr. M. Effects of zinc oxide-eugenol on shear bond strength of selected core/cement combinations. J Prosthet Dent 55 (1986) 206-208
19. In: Anusavice K., and Phillips R. (Eds). Phillips' science of dental materials. 11th ed. (2003), Elsevier, St. Louis 492
20. Bayindir F., Akyil M., and Bayindir Y. Effect of eugenol and non-eugenol containing temporary cement on permanent cement retention and microhardness of cured composite resin. Dent Mater J 22 (2003) 592-599
21. Li Z., and White S. Mechanical properties of dental luting cements. J Prosthet Dent 81 (1999) 597-609
22. Gilson T., and Myers G. Clinical studies of dental cements. 3. Seven zinc oxide-eugenol cements used for temporarily cementing completed restorations. J Dent Res 49 (1970) 14-20
23. Ayad M., Rosenstiel S., and Salama M. Influence of tooth surface roughness and type of cement on retention of complete cast crowns. J Prosthet Dent 77 (1997) 116-121
24. Yim N., Rueggeberg F., Caughman W., Gardener F., and Pashley D. Effect of dentin desensitizers and cementing agents on retention of full crowns using standardized crown preparations. J Prosthet Dent 83 (2000) 459-465
25. Ayad M., Rosenstiel S., and Woelfel J. The effect of recementation on crown retention. Int J Prosthodont 11 (1998) 177-182
26. Askeland D., and Phule P. The science and engineering of materials. 5th ed. (2006), Thomson Engineering, Toronto 204-207