Maximum anchorage in orthodontics with the palatal implant;Maximale Verankerung mit einem palatinalen Implantat

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 67, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 459-470

  Chhatwani, Bhupender ^a,b   Schneider, Bernd ^a  

^a Fachzahnarzt für Kieferorthopädie ^*

^b Fachzahnarzt für Kieferorthopädie   (Germany)

Author keywords

Maximum anchorage; Orthodontic midpalatal implant; Palate

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; CEPHALOMETRY; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; MALE; MAXILLA; MOLAR TOOTH; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; ORTHODONTICS; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT PLANNING;

BONE SCREWS; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; ORTHODONTIC WIRES; PALATE; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; SUTURE ANCHORS; TITANIUM; TOOTH ERUPTION, ECTOPIC; TOOTH MOVEMENT; TORQUE;

EID: 36549079244     PISSN: 14345293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00056-006-0526-8     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Begg PR, Kesling PC. The use of differential and optimum orthodontic forces. In: Begg PR, Kesling PC, eds. Begg orthodontic theory and technique. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company, 1977: 142-58.
2. Bench RW, Gugino CF, Hilgers JJ. Bio-Progressive Therapy Part 3: Visual treatment objective bio-progressive. J Clin Orthod 1977;11:744-63.
3. Bennet JC, McLaughlin RP. Transition from standard edgewise to preadjusted appliance systems. In: Bennet JC, McLaughlin R, eds. Orthodontic treatment mechanics and the preadjusted appliance. Aylesbury, England: Wolfe Publishing, 1993:65-87.
4. Bolton WA. Disharmony in tooth size and its relation to the analysis and treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1958;28:113-30.
5. Bolton WA. The clinical application of a tooth-size analysis. Am J Orthod 1962;48:504-29.
6. Diedrich P. Verschiedene orthodontische Verankerungssysteme - eine kritische Betrachtung. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1993;54:156-71.
7. Frenzel S. Zur Klinik der Straumann-Orthosystem-Implantate. Master Thesis, Donau-Universität Krems, 2004.
8. Jarabak JR, Fizzel JA. Biophysical considerations of orthodontic forces. In: Jarabak JR, Fizzel JA, eds. Technique and treatment with light-wire edgewise appliances. Vol. 1. Saint Louis: C. V. Mosby, 1972:277-8.
9. Jarabak JR. Development of a treatment plan in the light of one's concept of treatment objectives. Am J Orthod 1960;46:481-514.
10. Kanomi R. Mini-implant for orthodontic anchorage. J Clin Orthod 1997;31:763-67.
11. Ricketts RM. A four-step method to distinguish orthodontic changes from natural growth. J Clin Orthod 1975;9:208-28.
12. Ricketts RM, Bench RW, Gugino CF, et al. Visual treatment objective or V.T.O. In: Ricketts RM, Bench RW, Gugino CF, Hilger JJ, Schulhof RJ eds. Bioprogressive therapy. Denver: Rocky Mountain/Orthodontics, 1980:35-69.
13. Storey E, Smith R. Importance of force in orthodontics; design of cuspid retraction springs. Aust Dent J 1952;56:291-304.
14. Wehrbein H, Hövel P, Kinzinger G, et al. Load deflection behavior of transpalatal bars supported on orthodontic palatal implants. J Orofac Orthop 2004;65:312-20.
15. Wehrbein H, Glatzmaier J, Mundwiller U, et al. The Orthosystem - a new implant system for orthodontic anchorage in the palate. J Orofac Orthop 1996;57:142-53.
16. Wehrbein H, Merz BR, Diedrich P. Palatal bone support for orthodontic implant anchorage reinforcement. A clinical and radiological study. Eur J Orthod 1999;27:65-70.