Mirror therapy in rehabilitation after stroke: Effectiveness on upper limb functioning in chronic stroke patients;Spiegeltherapie in der neurologischen rehabilitation: Effektivität in bezug auf die arm- und handfunktionen bei chronischen schlaganfallpatienten

Neurologie und Rehabilitation

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 271-276

  Rothgangel, Andreas S ^a   Morton, A ^b   Van Der Hout, J W E ^b   Beurskens, A J H M ^b  

^a FRESENIUS UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b ZUYD UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Mirror neuron system; Mirror therapy; Mirror visual feedback; Rehabilitation; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; HUMAN; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RATING SCALE; REHABILITATION CARE; STROKE;

EID: 36549067788     PISSN: 09472177     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Altschuler EL, Wisdom SB, Stone L, et al.: Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror. Lancet 1999; 353: 2035-6
2. Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Koke AJ, Lindeman E, van der Heijden GJ, Regtop W, Knipschild PG: A patient-specific approach for measuring functional status in low back pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1999; 22: 144-8
3. Binkofski F, Ertelt D, Dettmers CH, Buccino G: Das Spiegelneuronensystem und seine Rolle in der neurologischen Rehabilitation. Neurol Rehabil 2004; 10: 113-20
4. Brodie EE, Whyte A, Waller B: Increased motor control of a phantom leg in humans results from the visual feedback of a virtual leg. Neurosci Lett 2003; 341: 167-9
5. Buccino G, Binkofski F, Fink GR, et al.: Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study. Eur J Neurosci 2001; 13: 400-4
6. Calautti C, Baron JC: Functional neuroimaging studies of motor recovery after stroke in adults: a review. Stroke 2003; 34: 1553-66
7. Dohle C, Kleiser R, Seitz RJ, et al: Body scheme gates visual processing. J Neurophysiol 2004; 91: 2376-9
8. Feydy A, Carlier R, Roby-Brami A, et al: Longitudinal study of motor recovery after stroke: recruitment and focusing of brain activation. Stroke 2002; 33: 1610-7
9. Garry MI, Loftus A, Summers JJ. Mirror, mirror on the wall: viewing a mirror reflection of unilateral hand movements facilitates ipsilateral M1 excitability. Exp Brain Res 2005; 163: 118-22
10. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Lindeman E: Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories. Restor Neurol Neurosci 2004; 22: 281-99
11. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, et al: Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke 2003; 34: 2181-6
12. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JW, et al: Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial. Lancet 1999; 354: 191-6
13. Lyle RC: A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical ehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehabil Res 1981; 4: 483-92
14. MacLachlan M, McDonald D, Waloch J: Mirror treatment of lower limb phantom pain: a case study. Disabil Rehabil 2004; 26: 901-4
15. McCabe CS, Haigh RC, Ring EF, et al: A controlled pilot study of the utility of mirror visual feedback in the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome (type 1), Rheumatology (Oxford) 2003; 42: 97-101
16. Miltner R, Netz J, Hömberg V: Kognitive Therapie sensomotorischer Störungen. Krankengymnastik 2000; 52: 954-64
17. Moseley GL: Graded motor imagery is effective for long-standing complex regional pain syndrome: a randomised controlled trial. Pain 2004; 108: 192-8
18. Ramachandran VS, Altschuler EL, Stone L, Al-Aboudi M, Schwartz E, Siva N: Can mirrors alleviate visual hemineglect? Med Hypotheses 1999; 52: 303-5
19. Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D, Cobb S: Touching the phantom limb. Nature 1995; 377: 489-90
20. Rothgangel AS, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Bastiaenen CHG, Hofman P, Backes W, de Bie RA, Seitz RJ: Recruitment of the mirror neuron system during mirror visual feedback in stroke patients and healthy subjects demonstrated by functional MRI - submitted
21. Rothgangel AS, Morton AR, van den Hout JWE, Beurskens AJHM: Phantoms in the brain: mirror therapy in chronic stroke patients; a pilot study. Nederlands Tijdschrift Fysiotherapie 2004; 114: 36-40
22. Sathian K, Greenspan AI, Wolf SL: Doing it with mirrors: a case study of a novel approach to neurorehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2000; 14: 73-6
23. Stevens JA, Stoykov ME: Simulation of bilateral movement training through mirror reflection: a case report demonstrating an occupational therapy technique for hemiparesis. Top Stroke Rehabil 2004; 11: 59-66
24. Taub E, Uswatte G, Elbert T: New treatments in neurorehabilitation founded on basic research. Neurosc 2002; 3: 228-36
25. Van der Lee JH, De Groot V, Beckerman H, et al: The intra- and interrater reliability of the action research arm test: a practical test of upper extremity function in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001; 82: 14-9
26. Ward NS, Brown MM, Thompson AJ, Frackowiak RS: Neural correlates of outcome after stroke: a crosssectional fMRI study. Brain 2003; 126: 1430-48
27. WHO: Stroke - 1989. Recommendations on stroke prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. Report of the WHO Task Force on Stroke and other Cerebrovascular Disorders. Stroke 1989; 20: 1407-31
28. WMA - The World Medical Association: Declaration of Helsinki 2000 (www.wma.net)