Japanese journals also have their citation classics in occupational medicine

Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment and Health

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 397-399

  Smith, Derek R ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER RESEARCH; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; JAPANESE; LETTER; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH; OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE; OCCUPATIONAL TOXICOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING;

EID: 36549067758     PISSN: 03553140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5271/sjweh.1159     Document Type: Letter

References (25)

1. Gehanno JF, Takahashi K, Darmoni S, Weber J. Citation classics in occupational medicine journals. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2007;33(4):245-51.
2. Garfield E. 100 citation classics from the Journal of the American Medical Association. JAMA. 1987;257(1):52-9.
3. Top 10 papers published. Scientist. 2005;19(20):26.
4. Lowry OH, Rosebrough NJ, Farr AL, Randall RJ. Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent. J Biol Chem. 1951;193(1):265-75.
5. van der Velde G. Taxonomists make a name for themselves. Nature. 2001;414(6860):148.
6. Sabin AB, Ramos-Alvarez M, Alvarez-Amezquita J, Pelon W, Michaels RH, Spigland I, et al. Live, orally given poliovirus vaccine: effects of rapid mass immunization on population under conditions of massive enteric infection with other viruses. JAMA. 1960;173:1521-6.
7. Garfield E. Citation indexes for science; a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science. 1955;122:108-11.
8. Garfield E. Commentary: fifty years of citation indexing, Int J Epidemiol. 2006;35(5):1127-8.
9. Garfield E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA. 2006;295(1):90-3.
10. Citation data: the wrong impact? Nat Neurosci. 1998;1(8):641-2.
11. Interview with Eugene Garfield, Chairman Emeritus of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI). Cortex. 2001;37:575-77.
12. Smith DR. Historical development of the journal impact factor and its relevance for occupational health. Ind Health. In press.
13. Valdecasas AG, Castroviejo S, Marcus LF. Reliance on the citation index undermines the study of biodiversity. Nature. 2000;403(6771):698.
14. Garfield E. Taxonomy is small, but it has its citation classics. Nature. 2001;413(6852):107.
15. Moller AP. National citations. Nature. 1990;348:480.
16. Smith DR, Sawada S, Araki S. Forty five years of INDUSTRIAL HEALTH. Ind Health. 2007;45(2):187-9.
17. Lundberg GD. Landmarks. JAMA. 1984;252:812.
18. Takahashi K, Aw TC, Koh D. An alternative to journal-based impact factors. Occup Med (Lond). 1999;49(1):57-9.
19. Uehara M, Takahashi K, Hoshuyama T, Tanaka C. A proposal for topic-based impact factors and their application to occupational health literature. J Occup Health. 2003;45(4):248-53.
20. Cancer Res 1990;50(5):1354. [Front cover]
21. Sakabe H. Lung cancer due to exposure to Bis (Chloromethyl) Ether. Ind Health. 1973;11(3):145-148.
22. Callaham M, Wears RL, Weber E. Journal prestige, publication bias, and other characteristics associated with citation of published studies in peer-reviewed journals. JAMA. 2002;287(21):2847-50.
23. McCunney RI, Harzbecker J. The influence of occupational medicine on general medicine: a look at the journals. J Occup Med. 1992;34(3):279-86.
24. Frumkin H. Don't lament, reinvent!: the future of occupational medicine. Am J Ind Med. 2002;42(6):526-8.
25. Levy BS. The continuing rise of occupational medicine. Am J Prev Med. 2002;22(4):326-7.