Development of a new quality fair access best value performance indicator (BVPI) for recycling services

Waste Management

Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 299-309

  Harder, M K ^a   Stantzos, N ^a   Woodard, R ^a   Read, A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRIGHTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATION THEORY; RECYCLING; STANDARDS; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

BEST VALUE PERFORMANCE INDICATOR (BVPI); MAXIMUM PRACTICABLE RECYCLING RATE PROVISION (MPRRP);

WASTE MANAGEMENT;

COMPUTATION THEORY; RECYCLING; STANDARDS; STRATEGIC PLANNING; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

COMPARATIVE STUDY; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; RECYCLING; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

ARTICLE; DOMESTIC WASTE; HOUSING; LAW ENFORCEMENT; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECYCLING; WASTE DISPOSAL;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; GREAT BRITAIN; PROGRAM EVALUATION; REFUSE DISPOSAL; WASTE PRODUCTS;

EURASIA; EUROPE; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 36549060063     PISSN: 0956053X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2006.12.015     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Adams K.T., Phillips P., and Morris J.R. A radical new development for sustainable waste management in the UK: the introduction of local authority Best Value legislation. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 30 (2000) 221-244
2. Belton B., Crowe D., Matthews R., and Scott S. A survey of public attitudes to recycling in Glasgow (U.K.). Waste Management & Research 12 (1994) 351-367
3. Brighton & Hove City Council. Sustainability waste 2004-2006 (2004), Brighton & Hove City Council, Brighton, UK
4. Department of the Environment, Transport and Regions. A Way With Waste A Draft Waste Strategy for England and Wales (1999), HMSO, London, UK
5. Department of the Environment, Transport and Regions. Waste Strategy 2000 for England and Wales (2000), HMSO, London, UK
6. Ecosys. Brighton and Hove City Council Household Waste Analysis March 2001 (2001), Ecosys, Brighton, UK
7. Environment Agency, 2002. The problem with waste in Sussex. www.environment-agency.gov.uk (accessed 21 Feb 2003).
8. Environmental Data Services Limited. Best Value highlights consultation as key to municipal waste strategies. ENDS 307 (2000) 34-35
9. Local Government Act, 1999. HMSO, London, UK.
10. Martin D. 2001 Census output areas: from concept to prototype. Office of National Statistics. Population Trends 94 (1998) 19-24
11. Office for National Statistics, 2004. Census 2001-Brighton & Hove Local Authority Profile, www.statistics.gov.uk/census2001 (accessed 11 June 2004).
12. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (2004) Local Government Performance - Key Facts for 'Brighton & Hove' 03/04, www.bvpi.gov.uk (accessed 16 June 2004).
13. Open University. Developing integrated waste management strategies: information needs and the role of locally-based data. Integrated Waste Systems (2003), The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK
14. Parfitt, J. 2002. Analysis of household waste composition and factors driving waste increases. Waste and Resources Action Programme, Banbury, UK.
15. Sussex Enterprise, 2004. Annual Economic Review 2004. www.sussexenterprise.co.uk (accessed 14 June 2004).
16. Williams I.D., and Taylor C. Maximising household waste recycling at civic amenity sites in Lancashire, England. Waste Management 24 9 (2004) 861-874