Restoration of matrix fields by second-order cone programming

Computing (Vienna/New York)

Volumn 81, Issue 2-3, 2007, Pages 161-178

  Steidl, G ^a   Setzer, S ^a   Popilka, B ^a   Burgeth, B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

^b SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

DT MRI; Matrix fields; Reaction diffusion equation; Second order cone programming(SOCP); Variational methods

Indexed keywords

ANISOTROPY; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING; EULER EQUATIONS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MEDICAL IMAGING;

EULER-LAGRANGE EQUATIONS; MATRIX FIELDS; REACTION-DIFFUSION EQUATION; SCALAR IMAGES; SECOND-ORDER CONE PROGRAMMING(SOCP); STRESS TENSORS;

MATRIX ALGEBRA;

EID: 36549055201     PISSN: 0010485X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00607-007-0247-x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (31)

1. Barvinok, A.: A course in convexity, graduate studies in mathematics. AMS, Providence (2002)
2. Basser P.J. (1995). Inferring microstructural features and the physical state of tissues from diffusion-weighted images. Nuclear Magn Reson Biomed 8: 333-334
3. Basser P.J., Mattiello J. and LeBihan D. (1994). MR diffusion tensor spectroscopy and imaging. Biophys J 66: 259-267
4. Berkels, B., Burger, M., Droske, Nemitz, M. O., Rumpf, M.: Cartoon extraction based on anisotropic image classification. In: Vision, modeling and visualization. Springer, Heidelberg (accepted)
5. Bigün J., Granlund G.H. and Wiklund J. (1991). Multi-dimensional orientation estimation with applications to texture analysis and optical flow. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 13(8): 775-790
6. Borwein J.M. and Lewis A.S. (2000). Convex analysis and nonlinear optimization. Springer, New York
7. Brox T., Weickert J., Burgeth B. and Mrázek P. (2006). Nonlinear structure tensors. Image Vis Comput 24(1): 41-55
8. Burgeth, B., Bruhn, A., Didas, S., Weickert, J., Welk, M.: Morphology for matrix-data: ordering versus PDE-based approach. Image Vis Comput (2007, in print)
9. Burgeth B., Bruhn A., Papenberg N., Welk M. and Weickert J. (2007). Mathematical morphology for matrix fields induced by the Loewner ordering in higher dimensions. Signal Process 87(2): 277-290
10. Chambolle A. (2004). An algorithm for total variation minimization and applications. J Math Imag Vis 20: 89-97
11. Chambolle A. and Lions P.-L. (1997). Image recovery via total variation minimization and related problems. Numer Math 76: 167-188
12. Ciarlet P.G. (1989). Introduction to numerical linear algebra and optimisation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
13. Förstner, W., Gülch, E.: A fast operator for detection and precise location of distinct points, corners and centres of circular features. In: Proc. ISPRS Intercommission Conf. on Fast Processing of Photogrammetric Data, pp. 281-305. Interlaken, Switzerland, June (1987)
14. Goldfarb D. and Yin W. (2005). Second-order cone programming methods for total variation-based image restoration. SIAM J Sci Comput 2(27): 622-645
15. Granlund G.H. and Knutsson H. (1995). Signal processing for computer vision. Kluwer, Dordrecht
16. Harris, C. G., Stephens, M.: A combined corner and edge detector. In: Proc. 4th Alvey Vision Conf., pp. 147-152. Manchester, UK, August 1988
17. Hintermüller W. and Kunisch W. (2004). Total bounded variation regularization as a bilaterally constrained optimization problem. SIAM J Appl Math 4(64): 1311-1333
18. Horn R.A. and Johnson C.R. (1990). Matrix analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
19. Lysaker, M., Lundervold, A., Tai, X.: Noise removal using fourth-order partial differential equations with applications to medical magnetic resonance images in space and time. Technical Report CAM-02-44, Department of Mathematics, University of California at Los Angeles (2002)
20. Lobo M.S., Vandenberghe, Boyd S. and Lebret H. (1998). Applications of second-order cone programming. Linear Algebra Appl 284: 193-228
21. Magnus J.R. and Neudecker H. (1988). Matrix differential calculus with applications in statistics and econometrics. Wiley, Chichester
22. Mittelmann H. (2003). An independent bechmarking of SDP and SOCP solvers. Math Program Series B 95(2): 407-430
23. Rao A.R. and Schunck B.G. (1991). Computing oriented texture fields. CVGIP Graph Models Image Process 53: 157-185
24. Rudin L.I., Osher S. and Fatemi E. (1992). Nonlinear total variation based noise removal algorithms. Physica A 60: 259-268
25. Scherzer O. and Weickert J. (2000). Relations between regularization and diffusion filtering. J Math Imag Vis 12(1): 43-63
26. Setzer, S., Steidl, G., Popilka, B., Burgeth. B.: Variational methods for denoising matrix fields. Preprint Univ. Mannheim, 2007
27. Steidl, G., Welk, M., Weickert, J.: Locally analytic schemes: a link between diffusion filtering and wavelet shrinkage. Appl Comput Harmon Anal (2007, to appear)
28. Tschumperlé, D., Deriche, R.: Diffusion tensor regularization with contraints preservation. In: Proc. 2001 IEEE Computer Society Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, vol. 1, pp. 948-953. IEEE Computer Science Press, Kauai (2001)
29. Vogel C.R. (2002). Computational methods for inverse problems. SIAM, Philadelphia
30. Weickert J. (1998). Anisotropic diffusion in image processing. Teubner, Stuttgart
31. Weickert, J., Brox, T.: Diffusion and regularization of vector- and matrix-valued images. In: (Nashed, M. Z., Scherzer, O., eds.) Inverse problems, image analysis, and medical imaging, Contemporary Mathematics, vol. 313, pp. 251-268. AMS, Providence (2002)