Seismic behavior and capacity/demand analyses of three multi-span simply supported bridges

Engineering Structures

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 54-66

  Saadeghvaziri, M Ala ^a   Yazdani Motlagh, A R ^b  

^a NEW JERSEY INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b Nishkian and Associates Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Bridges; Capacity; Demand; Multi span; Retrofit; Seismic

Indexed keywords

ABUTMENTS (BRIDGE); BRIDGE PIERS; ELASTICITY; RETROFITTING; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTIONS;

MULTI-SPAN-SIMPLY-SUPPORTED (MSSS); NONLINEAR TIME HISTORY ANALYSES; STIFFENING-INTERACTION;

BRIDGES;

ABUTMENTS (BRIDGE); BRIDGE PIERS; BRIDGES; ELASTICITY; RETROFITTING; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SOIL STRUCTURE INTERACTIONS;

BRIDGE; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; MODELING; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SEISMIC RETROFIT; SEISMICITY;

NEW JERSEY; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 36549050311     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.02.017     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. AASHTO. AASHTO LRFD bridge design specifications. 1st ed. Washington (DC); 1994
2. AASHTO. AASHTO standard specifications for highway bridges. 15th ed. Washington (DC); 1992
3. CALTRANS. Bridge design aids 14-1 (1989), California Department of Transportation, Sacramento (CA)
4. Prakash V., Powell G.H., Campbell D.D., and Filippou F.C. DRAIN-2DX preliminary element user guide (1992), Dept. of Civil Engineering, University of California, Berkeley (CA)
5. Powell G.H., Campbell S.. DRAIN-3DX element description and user guide. Report no. UCB/SEMM- 94/08. Berkeley (CA): Dept. of Civil Engrg., Univ. of California; 1994
6. Federal Highway Administration. Seismic design of highway bridge foundations Vol. II: Design procedures and guidelines. Report no. FHWA/RD-86/102; 1986
7. Federal Highway Administration. Seismic retrofitting manual for highway bridges. Publication no. FHWA-RD-94-052; 1995
8. Goel R.K., and Chopra A.K. Evaluation of bridge abutment capacity and stiffness during earthquakes. Earthq Spec 13 1 (1997) 1-23
9. Mander J.B., Kim D.-K., Chen S.S., Premus G.J.. Response of steel bridge bearings to reversed cyclic loading. Technical report NCEER-96-0014; 1996
10. Mander J.B., Priestly M.J.N., and Park R. Theoretical stress-strain model for confined concrete. ASCE J Struct Eng 114 8 (1988)
11. Maroney B., Kutter B., Romstad K., Chai Y.H., Vanderbilt E.. Interpretation of large scale bridge abutment test results. In: Proceedings, 3rd annual seismic research workshop; 1994
12. Saadeghvaziri M.A., Rashidi S.. Seismic retrofit and design issues for bridges in New Jersey. Transportation research records, no. 1594; 1997
13. Saadeghvaziri M.A., Rashidi S.. Effect of steel bearings on seismic response of bridges in eastern United States. In: Proc. of the 6th US national conf. on earth. engrg.; 1998
14. Saadeghvaziri M.A., Yazdani-Motlagh A.R., and Rashidi S. Effects of soil-structure interaction on longitudinal seismic response of MSSS bridges. Soil Dyn Earth Eng 20 1-4 (1999)
15. Saadeghvaziri M.A., Yazdani-Motlagh A.R.. Seismic retrofitting and design of highway bridges in New Jersey. Report no. FHWA/NJ-99-026-7270. NJIT; 1999
16. Wilson J., and Tan B.S. Bridge abutments: Formulation of simple model for earthquake response analysis. J Eng Mech, ASCE 116 8 (1990)
17. Yazdani-Motlagh A.R., and Saadeghvaziri M.A. Nonlinear seismic response of stiffening SDOF systems. J Earthq Wind Ocean Eng 23 10 (2001)
18. Zimmerman R.M., Brittain R.D.. Seismic response of multi-simple span highway bridges. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Canadian conf. on earthquake engineering. 1979