Adopting and adapting the mini-CEX as an undergraduate assessment and learning tool

Clinical Teacher

Volumn 4, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 244-248

  Hill, Faith ^a   Kendall, Kathleen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCREDITATION; ARTICLE; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; LEARNING STYLE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT; PROFESSIONAL KNOWLEDGE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RATING SCALE; STUDENT ATTITUDE;

EID: 36549044501     PISSN: 17434971     EISSN: 1743498X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-498X.2007.00185.x     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. American Board of Internal Medicine Clinical Competence Program. The mini-CEX: A quality tool in evaluation. guidelines and implementation strategies from program directors. Work in progress. Philadelphia, PA: ABIM Clinical Competence Program, June 2002.
2. Norcini J, Blank L, Arnold G, Kimball H. The mini-CEX (clinical evaluation exercise): A preliminary investigation. Ann Intern Med 1995;123:795-799.
3. Norcini J, Blank L, Arnold G, Kimball H. Examiner differences in the mini-CEX. Adv Health Sci Educ 1997;2:27-33.
4. Norcini J, Blank L, Duffy D, Fortna G. The mini-CEX: A method for assessing clinical skills. Ann Intern Med 2003;138:476-481.
5. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A., Burgess RG, eds. Analyzing qualitative data. London: Routledge 1994: 173-194.
6. Newble DI, Jaeger K. The effect of assessments and examinations on the learning of medical students. Med Educ 1983;17:1.