The nature and role of monetary policy when money is endogenous

Cambridge Journal of Economics

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 847-860

  Arestis, Philip ^a,b   Sawyer, Malcolm ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Endogenous money; Interest rate policy; New consensus; Role of monetary policy

Indexed keywords

INTEREST RATE; KEYNESIAN THEORY; MACROECONOMICS; MONETARY POLICY; POLICY ANALYSIS; PRIVATE SECTOR;

EID: 36549035744     PISSN: 0309166X     EISSN: 14643545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/cje/bel023     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Arestis, P. and Howells, P. 1996. Theoretical reflections on endogenous money: The problem with convenience lending, Cambridge Journal of Economics, vol. 20, no. 5, 539-51
2. Arestis, P. and Sawyer, M. 2003. Does the stock of money have any significance?, Banca Nazionale del Lavoro, vol. 56, no. 225, 113-36
3. Arestis, P. and Sawyer, M. 2004A. Can monetary policy affect the real economy?, European Review of Economics and Finance, vol. 3, no. 2, 9-32
4. Arestis, P. and Sawyer, M. 2004B. On the effectiveness of monetary policy and of fiscal policy, Review of Social Economy, vol. 62, no. 4, 441-63
5. Arestis, P. and Sawyer, M. 2004C. Can monetary policy affect the real economy?, European Review of Economics and Finance, vol. 3, no. 3, 9-32
6. Bain, K. and Howells, P. G. A. 2003. Monetary Economics: Policy and its Theoretical Basis, Basingstoke, Palgrave Macmillan
7. Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin 2004. The new Bank of England quarterly model, Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, vol. 44, no. 2, 188-93
8. Bernanke, B. S., Gertler, M. and Gilchrist, S. 1999. The financial accelerator in a quantitative business cycle framework, in Taylor, J. and Woodford, M. (eds), Handbook of Macroeconomics Vol. 1, Amsterdam, North Holland
9. Chick, V. and Dow, S. 2002. Monetary policy with endogenous money and liquidity preference: A nondualistic treatment, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, vol. 24, no. 4, 587-607
10. Church, K. B., Mitchel, P. R., Sault, J. E. and Wallis, K. F. 1997. Comparative properties of models of the UK economy, National Institute Economic Review, vol. 161, 91-100
11. Clarida, R., Galí, J. and Gertler, M. 1999. The science of monetary policy: A new Keynesian perspective, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 37, no. 4, 1661-707
12. Dalziel, P. 2002. The triumph of Keynes: What now for monetary policy research, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, vol. 24, no. 4, 511-28
13. Fair, R. 2005. Estimates of the effectiveness of monetary policy, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, vol. 37, no. 4, 645-60
14. Gordon, R. J. 1997. The time-varying NAIRU and its implications for economic policy, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 11, no. 1, 11-32
15. Lavoie, M. 2003. A primer on endogenous credit money, in Rochon, L-P. and Rossi, S. (eds), Modern Theories of Money, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar
16. Meyer, L. H. 2001. Does money matter?, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, vol. 83, no. 5, 1-15
17. McCallum B. T. 2001. Monetary policy analysis in models without money, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, vol. 83, no. 4, 145-60
18. Moore, B. J. 1989. A model of bank intermediation, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, vol. 12, no. 1, 10-29
19. Stiglitz, J. E. and Weiss, A. 1981. Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information, American Economic Review, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 393-410
20. Taylor, J. B. 1993. Discretion versus policy rules in practice, Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, vol. 39, 159-214