Fiducial marker based on projective invariant for augmented reality

Journal of Computer Science and Technology

Volumn 22, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 890-897

  Li, Yu ^a   Wang, Yong Tian ^a   Liu, Yue ^a  

^a BEIJING INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Augmented reality; Fiducial marker; Pose estimation; Projective invariant; Registration

Indexed keywords

CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION; FIDUCIAL MARKER; POSE ESTIMATION; PROJECTIVE INVARIANT;

COMPUTER APPLICATIONS; DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS; IMAGE CODING; INVARIANCE; ROBUST CONTROL;

VIRTUAL REALITY;

EID: 36549033690     PISSN: 10009000     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11390-007-9100-0     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Azuma R. A survey in Augmented Reality. Presence - Teleoperations and Virtual Environment, Aug. 1997, 6(4): 355-385.
2. Ohta Y, Tamura H. Mixed Reality Merging Real and Virtual Worlds. Springer-Verlag, 1999, pp.379-390.
3. Youngkwan Cho, Jongweon Lee, Ulrich Neumann. A multi-ring fiducial system and an intensity-invariant detection method for scalable augmented reality. In Proc. IEEE and ACM International Workshop on Augmented Reality, San Francisco, California, 1998, pp.147-165.
4. Leonid N, Eric F. Circular data matrix fiducial system and robust image processing for a wearable vision-inertial self-tracker. In Proc. IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR'02), Los Alamitos, California, 2002, pp.27-36.
5. Lopez de Ipina. D. TRIP: A low-cost vision-based location system for ubiquitous computing. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, May 2002, 6(3): 206-219.
6. Forsyth, D. Invariant descriptors for 3-d object recognition and pose. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1991, 13(10): 971-991.
7. C B Owen, Fan Xiao, P Middlin. What is the best fiducial? In Proc. 1st IEEE International Workshop on Augmented Reality Toolkit, Darmstadt, Germany, Sept. 2002, p.8.
8. Kato H, Billinghurst M. Marker tracking and HMD calibration for a video-based Augmentnd Reality conferencing system. In Proc. 2nd IEEE and ACM International Workshop on Augmented Reality (IWAR 99), San Francisco, CA, 1999, pp.85-94.
9. Zhang X, Fronz S, Navab N. Visual marker detection and decoding in AR systems: A comparative study. In Proc. Int. Symp. Mixed and Augmented Reality, Darmstadt, Germany, 2002, pp.97-106.
10. Rekimoto J. Matrix: A realtime object identification and registration method for augmented reality. In Proc. 3rd Asia Pacific Computer Human Interaction, Hayama-machi, Kanagawa, Japan, July 15-17, 1998, pp.63-68.
11. Rekimoto J, Ayatsuka Y. CyberCode: Designing Augmented Reality environments with visual tags. In Proc. Designing Augmented Reality Environments, Denmark, April 2000, pp.1-10.
12. Zhang X, Navab N. Tracking and pose estimation for computer assisted localization in industrial environments. In Proc. Applications of Computer Vision, 4-6 Dec. 2000, pp.214-221.
13. Zhang X, Navab N, Liou S. E-commerce direct marketing using augmented reality. In Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Multimedia Expo., New York, 2000, pp.88-91.
14. Fiala M. Fiducial marker systems for augmented reality: Comparison between ARTag and ARToolkit. In Proc. MIRAGE 2005: Computer Vision/Computer Graphics Collaboration for Model Based Imaging, Rendering, Image Analysis and Graphical Special Effects, INRIA Rocquencourt, France, Mar. 2005.
15. Fiala M. ARTag, a fiducial marker system using digital techniques. In Proc. IEEE Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR 2005), San Diego, California, June 2005, pp.590-596.
16. David F, Joseph M, Andrew Z, Chris C, Aaron H, Charles R. Invariant descriptors for 3D object recognition and pose. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, October 1991, 23(2): 116-128.
17. Vassilios T, Konstantinos C, Panos T. Landmark-based navigation using projective invariants. In Proc. 1998 IEEE/RSJ Int. Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, Canada, October 1998, pp.342-347.
18. George B, Michael G, Niels L. Learning geometric hashing functions for model-based object recognition. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 1998, 9(5):560-570.
19. Isaac W, Manjit R. Model-based recognition of 3D objects from single images. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, February 2001, 23(2): 116-128.
20. Robert L, Jurriaan M. Optical tracking using projective invariant marker pattern properties. In Proc. IEEE Virtual Reality 2003 (VR'03), Los Angeles, California, March 2003, pp.191-198.
21. Alberto S, Antoni L, Walter E. Sensibility, relative error and error probability of projective invariants of planar surfaces of 3d objects. In Proc. 11th IAPR International Conference on Pattern Recognition, Hague, Netherlands, 1992, pp.328-331.
22. Mundy J, Zisserman A. Geometric Invariance in Computer Vision. Massachusetts: Cambridge, MIT Press, 1992.
23. Lenz R, Meer P. Point configuration invariants under simultaneous projective and permutation transformations. Pattern Recognition, 1994, 27(11): 1523-1532.
24. Meer P, Lenz R, Ramakrishna S. Efficient invariant representations. Int. J. Computer Vision, 1998, 26(2): 137-152.
25. Beucher S, Lantuejoul C. Use of watersheds in contour detection. In Proc. Int. Workshop on Image Processing, Real-Time Edge and Motion Detection/Estimation, Rennes, 1979, pp.17-21.
26. Gabriella C, Olivier F. Algebraic and geometric tools to compute projective and permutation invariants. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, January 1999, 21(1): 58-65.
27. Aström K E, Morin L. Random cross ratios. In Proc. Ninth Scandinavian Conf. Image Analyses, 1995, Uppsala, Sweden, pp.1053-1061.
28. Lu C, Hager G, Mjolsness E. Fast and globally convergent pose estimation from video images. IEEE Trans. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2000, 22(6): 610-622.
29. OpenCV: Open source computer vision library. http://www.intel.com/ research/mrl/research/opencv/.