Control of both winter annual and summer annual weeds in no-till corn with between-row mowing systems

Weed Technology

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 591-601

  Donald, William W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

Alternative weed control; Application; Band application; Banding; Cutting; Decreased herbicide rate; Mechanical weed control; Nonchemical weed control

Indexed keywords

CROP YIELD; GROWING SEASON; HERBICIDE; MAIZE; MECHANICAL CONTROL; MOWING; ZERO TILLAGE;

MISSOURI; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

ZEA MAYS;

EID: 36549032232     PISSN: 0890037X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/WT-05-141.1     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bedmar, F., P. Manetti, and G. Monterubbianesi. 1999. Determination of the critical period of weed control in corn using a thermal basis. Pesq. Agropec. Bowas. Basilia 34:187-193.
2. Bicki, T. J., L. M. Wax, and S. K. Sipp. 1991. Evaluation of reduced herbicide application strategies for weed control in coarse-textured soils. J. Prod. Agric. 4:516-519.
3. Donald, W. W. 2000a. Between row mowing + in-row band-applied herbicide for weed control in Glycine max. Weed Sci. 48:487-500.
4. Donald, W. W. 2000b. Timing and frequency of between-row mowing and band-applied herbicide for annual weed control in soybean. Agron. J. 92:1013-1019.
5. Donald, W. W. 2006. Preemergence banded herbicides followed by only one between-row mowing controls weeds in corn. Weed Technol. 20:143-149.
6. Donald, W. W. and W. G. Johnson. 2003. Interference effects of weed-infested bands in or between crop rows on field corn (Zea mays) yield. Weed Technol. 17:755-763.
7. Donald, W. W., N. R. Kitchen, and K. A. Sudduth. 2001. Between-row mowing + banded herbicide to control annual weeds and reduce herbicide use in no-till soybean (Glycine max) and corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 15:576-584.
8. Doyle, P. and M. Stypa. 2004. Reduced herbicide rate - a Canadian perspective. Weed Technol. 18:1157-1165.
9. Hall, M. R., C. J. Swanton, and G. W. Anderson. 1992. The critical period of weed control in grain corn (Zea mays). Weed Sci. 40:441-447.
10. Hoshmand, A. R. 1994. Experiment Research Design and Analysis. A Practical Approach for Agricultural and Natural Sciences. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press. 408 p.
11. Knake, E. L. and F. W. Slife. 1965. Giant foxtail seeded at various times in corn and soybeans. Weeds 13:331-334.
12. Knake, E. L. and F. W. Slife. 1969. Effect of time of giant foxtail removal from corn and soybean. Weed Sci. 17:281-283.
13. Kudsk, P. and J. C. Streibig. 2003. Herbicides - a two-edged sword. Weed Res. 43:90-102.
14. Logan, T. J. 1993. Agricultural best management practices for water pollution control: current issues. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 46:223-231.
15. Rajcan, I. and C. J. Swanton. 2001. Understanding maize-weed competition: resource competition, light quality and the whole plant. Field Crops Res. 71:139-150.
16. Richards, R. P. and D. B. Baker. 1993. Pesticide concentration patterns in agricultural drainage networks in the Lake Erie Basin. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 12:13-26.
17. Ruiz, J. A., J. J. Sanchez, and M. M. Goodman. 1998. Base temperature and heat unit requirements of 49 Mexican maize races. Maydica 43:277-282.
18. Santelmann, P. W., J. A. Meade, and R. A. Peters. 1963. Growth and development of yellow foxtail and giant foxtail. Weeds 11:139-142.
19. Tokatlidis, I. S. and S. D. Koutroubas. 2004. A review of maize hybrid's dependence on high plant populations and its implications for crop yield stability. Field Crops Res. 88:103-114.
20. Tollenaar, M. 1992. Is low plant density a stress in maize? Maydica 37:305-311.
21. Tollenaar, M., A. A. Dibo, A. Aguilera, S. F. Weise, and C. J. Swanton. 1994b. Effect of crop density on weed interference in maize. Agron. J. 86:591-595.
22. Tollenaar, M., D. E. McCullough, and L. M. Dwyer. 1994a. Physiological basis of the genetic improvement of corn. Pages 183-236 in G. A. Slafer, ed. Genetic Improvement of Field Crops. New York: Marcel Dekker.
23. Tollenaar, M. and J. Wu. 1999. Yield improvement in temperature maize is attributable to greater stress tolerance. Crop Sci. 39:1597-1604.
24. [USDA-NASS] USDA-National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2004. Agricultural Chemical Usage Database. http://www.pestmanagement.info/nass/ app_usage.cfm. Accessed: September 2, 2005.
25. Zhang, J., S. E. Weaver, and A. S. Hamill. 2000. Risks and reliability of using herbicides at below-labeled rates. Weed Technol. 14:106-115.