Comparing call graphs

ACM SIGPLAN/SIGSOFT Workshop on Program Analysis for Software Tools and Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 37-42

  Lhoták, Ondřrej ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Call graph; Comparison tools; Dynamic analysis; Interpreting analysis results; Static analysis

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAM LISTINGS; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; STATIC ANALYSIS;

CALL GRAPHS; INTERPRETING ANALYSIS; PROGRAM ANALYSIS; QUALITATIVE IDENTIFICATION;

COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 36549026365     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1251535.1251542     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Graphviz - graph visualization software. http://www.graphviz.org/.
2. *J: A tool for dynamic analysis of java programs. http://www.sable.mcgill.ca/starj/.
3. Soot: a Java optimization framework. http://www.sable.mcgill.ca/soot/.
4. yEd - Java graph editor. http://www.yworks.com/en/products_yed-about.htm.
5. B. Dufour. Objective quantification of program behaviour using dynamic metrics. Master's thesis, McGill University, June 2004.
6. B. Dufour, K. Driesen, L. Hendren, and C. Verbrugge. Dynamic metrics for Java. In Proceedings of the 18th Annual ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming, Systems, Languages, and Applications, pages 149-168. ACM Press, 2003.
7. B. Dufour, L. Hendren, and C. Verbrugge. *J: a tool for dynamic analysis of Java programs. In OOPSLA '03: Companion of the 18th Annual ACM SIGPLAN Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications, pages 306307, New York, NY, USA, 2003. ACM Press.
8. M. D. Ernst. Static and dynamic analysis: synergy and duality. In Proceedings of the ACM-SIGPLAN-SIGSOFT Workshop on Program Analysis for Software Tools and Engineering, pages 35-35. ACM Press, 2004.
9. D. Grove and C. Chambers. A framework for call graph construction algorithms. ACM Transactions on Programming Languages and Systems, 23(6):685-746, Nov. 2001.
10. M. Hind. Pointer analysis: haven't we solved this problem yet? In Proceedings of the 2001 ACM SIGPLAN-SIGSOFT Workshop on Program Analysis for Software Tools and Engineering, pages 54-61. ACM Press, 2001.
11. M. Hind and A. Pioli. Which pointer analysis should I use? In Proceedings of the 2000 ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, pages 113-123. ACM Press, 2000.
12. O. Lhoták. Spark: A flexible points-to analysis framework for Java. Master's thesis, McGill University, Dec. 2002.
13. O. Lhoták. Program Analysis using Binary Decision Diagmms. PhD thesis, McGill University, Jan. 2006.
14. O. Lhoták and L. Hendren. Scaling Java points-to analysis using Spark. In G. Hedin, editor, Compiler Construction, 12th International Conference, volume 2622 of LNCS, pages 153-169, Warsaw, Poland, Apr. 2003. Springer.
15. O. Lhoták and L. Hendren. Context-sensitive points-to analysis: is it worth, it? In A. Mycroft and A. Zeller, editors, Compiler Construction, 15th International Conference, volume 3923 of LNCS, pages 47-64, Vienna, Mar. 2006. Springer.
16. D. Liang, M. Pennings, and M. J. Harrold. Evaluating the impact of context-sensitivity on Andersen's algorithm for Java programs. In PASTE '05: The 6th ACM SIGPLAN-SIGSOFT Workshop on Program Analysis for Software Tools and Engineering, pages 6-12, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press.
17. A. Milanova. Precise and Practical Flow Analysis of Object-Oriented Software. PhD thesis, Rutgers University, Aug. 2003.
18. A. Milanova, A. Rountev, and B. G. Ryder. Parameterized object sensitivity for points-to and side-effect analyses for Java. In Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, pages 1-11. ACM Press, 2002.