Grounded theory: Managing the challenge for those facing Institutional Review Board Oversight

Qualitative Inquiry

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 28-45

  O'Connor, Mary Katherine ^a   Netting, F Ellen ^a   Thomas, M Lori ^a  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Grounded theory; Institutional Review Board; Qualitative research standards

Indexed keywords

EID: 36549017227     PISSN: 10778004     EISSN: 15527565     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1077800407308907     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis. London: Heineman.
2. Charmaz, K. (1983). The grounded theory method: An explication and interpretation. In R. M. Emerson (Ed.), Contemporary field research (pp. 109-126). Boston: Little, Brown.
3. Charmaz, K. (1995). Grounded theory. In J. A. Sith, R. Harre, & L. Van Langehove (Eds.), Rethinking methods in psychology (pp. 27-49). London: Sage.
4. Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 509-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Charmaz, K. (2005). Grounded theory in the 21st century: A qualitative method for advancing social justice research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 507-535). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Clark, A.E. (2003). Situational analyses: Grounded theory mapping after the postmodern turn. Symbolic Interaction, 26, 553-576.
8. Clark, A.E. (2005). Situational analysis: Grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
10. Guba, E. (1990). The paradigm dialog. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
11. Lincoln, Y.S. (1998). From understanding to action: New imperatives, new criteria, new methods for interpretive researchers. Theory and Research in Social Education, 26, 12-29.
12. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
13. Patton, M.Q. (2002). Two decades of developments in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Social Work, 1, 2261-2283.
14. Rodwell, M.K. (1998). Social work constructivist research. New York: Garland Publishers.
15. Shek, D., Tang, V., & Han, X. (2005). Evaluation of evaluation studies using qualitative research methods in social work literature (1990-2003): Evidence that constitutes a wake-up call. Research on Social Work Practice, 15(3), 180-194.
16. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998a). Basics of qualitative research techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998b). Grounded theory methodology and overview. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 158-183). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.