The potential for premium-intermodal services to reduce freight CO2 emissions in the Quebec City-Windsor Corridor

Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-9

  Patterson, Zachary ^a   Ewing, Gordon O ^b   Haider, Murtaza ^c  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c RYERSON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Freight mode choice; Greenhouse gas emissions; Intermodal freight transportation

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION; GREENHOUSE GASES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; SURVEYS; TRAFFIC CONGESTION; TRUCKS;

FREIGHT MODE CHOICE; GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS; TRUCK TRAFFIC;

GAS EMISSIONS;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CARBON EMISSION; EMISSION CONTROL; ESTIMATION METHOD; FREIGHT TRANSPORT; GREENHOUSE GAS; SURVEY;

CANADA; NORTH AMERICA; QUEBEC [CANADA];

EID: 36549011669     PISSN: 13619209     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trd.2007.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Canadian National Railway, 2000. 1999 Annual Report, Canadian National Railway, Montreal.
2. Canadian Pacific Railway. Truck Trailers (Expressway). , 2004. Canadian Pacific Railway, 4-22-2004.
3. Environment Canada, 2002. Making Transportation Sustainable: A Case Study of the Quebec Windsor Corridor, Environment Canada, Ottawa, En40-660/2002E.
4. Environment Canada, 2004. Canada's Greenhouse Gas Inventory - Factsheet #3 - Transportation. . Environment Canada, 7-31-2006.
5. Forkenbrock, D., 1998. External Costs of Truck & Rail Freight Transportation University of Iowa Public Policy Center, Iowa City.
6. Forkenbrock D. Comparison of External Costs of Rail and Truck Freight Transportation. Transportation Research Part A 35 (2001) 321-337
7. Greene W. Econometric Analysis. 4th ed. (2000), Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River
8. Kennedy P. A Guide to Econometrics. 5th ed. (2003), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
9. Norojono O., and Young W. A stated preference freight mode choice model. Transportation Planning and Policy 26 (2003) 195-212
10. Patterson Z., Ewing G., and Haider M. Shipper preferences suggest strong mistrust of rail: the first SP carrier choice survey in the Quebec City-Windsor Corridor. Transportation Research Record (2008) 67-74
11. Shinghal N., and Fowkes A. Freight mode choice and adaptive stated preferences. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review 38 (2002) 367-378
12. Taylor, B., 2005. The Development of the MOBILE6.2C Model, Environment Canada, Gatineau, Quebec, M6C-06-E.
13. The Bytown Railway Society, 2003. The Canadian Trackside Guide, 2003, Ottawa.
14. Transport Canada, 2004. Transportation in Canada 2004, Transport Canada, Ottawa.
15. US Environmental Protection Agency, 2003. User's Guide to MOBILE6.1 and MOBILE6.2: Mobile Source Emission Factor Model, USEPA, Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Washington, DC, EPA420-R-03-010.
16. Vellay, C., de Jong, G., 2003. Analyse conjointe SP/RP du choix du mode transport de marchandises dans la Région Nord-Pas-de-Calais RAND, Santa Monica.
17. Wigan M., Rockliffe N., Thoresen T., and Tsolakis D. Valuing long-haul and metropolitan freight travel time and reliability. Journal of Transportation and Statistics 3 (2000) 83-89