How much can we trust some moment tensors or an attempt of seismic moment error estimation

Acta Geodynamica et Geomaterialia

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 13-20

  Kolář, Petr ^a  

^a GEOPHYSICAL INSTITUTE   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Error estimation; Seismic moment decomposition; Seismic moment tensor inversion

Indexed keywords

EID: 36549001237     PISSN: 12149705     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Baish, S., Bohnhoff, M., Ceranna L, Tu, Y. and Harjes, H.-P.: 2002, Probing the crust down to 9 km depth: A unique long-term fluid injection experiment at the KTB superdeep drilling hole, Germany, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 92/6, 2369- 2380.
2. Boender, C.G.E., Rinnooy Kan, A.H.G. and Timmer, G.T.: 1982, A Stochastic method for global optimalisation, mathematical programming, 22, 125 - 140.
3. Csendes, T.: 1988, Nonlinear parameter estimation by global optimization - Efficiency and reliability, Acta Cybernetica, VIII/4, 361 - 370.
4. Červený, V.: 2005, Seismic ray theory, Cambridge University Press.
5. Červený, V. and Pšenčík, I.: 1984, Documentation of earthquake algorithms SEIS83 - Numerical modeling of seismic wave fields in 2-D laterally varying layered structures by the Ray method. E. R. Engdahl edit., Report SE-35, Boulder, 36 - 40.
6. 2 Degassing Region Vogtland/NW Bohemia, Scientific Technical Report STR05/06, Potsdam.
7. Horálek, J., Fischer, T., Boušková, A. and Jedlička, P.: 2000, The Western Bohemia-Vogtland region in the light of the Webnet network, Studia Geod. et Geophys., 44(2), 107-125.
8. Jechumtálová, Z. and Šílený, J.: 2005, Amplitude ratios for complete moment tensor retrieval, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L22303.
9. Jost, M.L. and Herrmann, R.B.: 1989, A student's guide to and review of moment tensors, Seism. Res. Let., 60, 2, 37 - 57.
10. Julian, B.R., Miller, A.D., and Foulger G.R.: 1998, Non-double-couple earthquakes, Reviews of Geophys., 36, 4, 525 - 549.
11. Kolář, P., 2000, Comparing tests of several non-linear inversion methods on three simple synthetic problems, Acta Montana, Series A No. 14(114), pp.39-54
12. L2.0, Jan 17 1997 event, Acta Montana, 22 (129) ser. A, 33 - 49.
13. Lomax, A.: 2005, Seismogram visualization and analysis software for the Internet, http://alomax.free.fr/seisgram/SeisGram2K.html
14. Málek, J., Janský, J. and Horálek, J.: 2000, Layered velocity models of the Western Bohemia region, Studia Geoph. et Geodet., 44, 475 - 490.
15. Menke, W.: 1989, Geophysical data analysis: Discrete inverse theory. Int. Geoph. Series, 45, Academic Press, Inc.
16. Šílený, J.: 1998, Earthquake source parameters and their confidence regions by a genetic algorithm with a 'memory', Geophys. J. Int, 134, 228 - 242. Vavryčuk, V., 2001, Inversion for parameters of tensile earthquakes, J. Geoph. Res., Vol. 106, No. B8, pp. 16,339-16,355
17. Vavryčuk, V., 2001, Inversion for parameters of tensile earthquakes, J. Geoph. Res., Vol. 106, No. B8, pp. 16,339-16,355
18. Vavryčuk, V., Bohnhoff, M., Jechumtálová, Z., Kolář, P. and Šílený, J.: 2007, Non-double-couple mechanisms of induced micro-earthquakes during the 2000 injection experiment at the KTB site, Germany: a result of tensile faulting or anisotropy of a rock ?, J. Geophys. Res., submitted.