On how to get beyond the opening stage

Argumentation

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 233-242

  Krabbe, Erik C W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Completion problem; Critical discussion; Fixity problem; Metadialogue; Opening stage; Pragma dialectics

Indexed keywords

EID: 36448975522     PISSN: 0920427X     EISSN: 15728374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-007-9052-0     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. van Eemeren F. H., Grootendorst R. 1984 Speech Acts in Argumentative Discussions: A Theoretical Model for the Analysis of Discussions Directed Towards Solving Conflicts of Opinion, Foris Publications, Dordrecht/Cinnaminson, NJ
2. van Eemeren F. H., Grootendorst R. 1992 Argumentation, Communication, and Fallacies: A Pragma-Dialectical Perspective, NJ/Hove, Hillsdale and Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London
3. van Eemeren F. H., Grootendorst R. 2004 A Systematic Theory of Argumentation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
4. Freeman J. B. 2005 Acceptable Premises: An Epistemic Approach to an Informal Logic Problem, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
5. Krabbe, Erik C. W.: 2003, 'Metadialogues,' in Frans H. van Eemeren, J. Anthony Blair, Charles A. Willard and A. Francisca Snoeck Henkemans (eds.), Anyone Who has a View: Theoretical Contributions to the Study of argumentation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht [etc.], pp. 83-90