Intersession reproducibility of mass spectrometry profiles and its effect on accuracy of multivariate classification models

Bioinformatics

Volumn 23, Issue 22, 2007, Pages 3065-3072

  Pelikan, Richard ^a,b,c   Bigbee, William I ^d   Malehorn, David ^d   Lyons Weiler, James ^b,c,d   Hauskrecht, Milos ^a,b,c,d  

^a University of Pittsburgh   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLOOD SAMPLING; CLASSIFICATION ALGORITHM; CLASSIFIER; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LUNG CANCER; MALE; MASS SPECTROMETRY; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; PROTEOMICS; REPRODUCIBILITY; SURFACE ENHANCED LASER DESORPTION IONIZATION TIME OF FLIGHT MASS SPECTROMETRY;

EID: 36448972675     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 13674811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm415     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Baggerly,K.A. et al. (2004) Reproducibility of SELDI-TOF protein patterns in serum: Comparing datasets from different experiments. Bioinformatics, 20, 777-785.
2. Diamandis,E.P. (2003) Point: ProteoDic patterns in biological fluids: do they represent the future of cancer diagnostics? Clin. Chem., 49, 1272-1275.
3. Efron,B. (1982) The Jackknife, the Bootstrap, and Other Resampling Plans. Society for Industrial & Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, 38.
4. Good,P. (1994) Permutation Tests: A Practical Guide to Resampling Methods for Testing Hypotheses. Springer, New York, USA.
5. Grizzle,W. et al. (2005) The need for review and understanding of seldi/maldimass spectroscopy data prior to analysis. Cancer Inform. 1, 86-97.
6. Hauskrecht,M. et al. (2005) Feature selection for classification of seldi-tof-ms proteomic profiles. Appl. Bioinformatics, 4, 227-246.
7. Hauskrecht,M. et al. (2007) In Dubitzky,W. et al. (eds) Fundamentals of Data Mining in Genomics and Proteomics, Springer, New York, USA. pp. 149-172.
8. Nadeau,C. and Bengio,Y. (2003) Inference for the generalization error. Mach. Learn, 52, 239-281.
9. Pelikan,R. et al. (2004) Serum Proteomic Profiling and Analysis Elsevier, London, UK.
10. Petricoin,E.F. et al. (2002) Use of proteomic patterns in serum to identify ovarian cancer. Lancet, 359, 572-577.
11. Ranganathan,S. et al. (2006) Assessment of protein stability in cerebrospinal fluid using surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry protein profiling. Clin. Proteomics 2, 91-101.
12. Ransohoff,D.F. (2005) Bias as a threat to the validity of cancer molecular-marker research. Nat. Rev. Cancer, 5, 142-149.
13. Semmes,O.J. et al. (2005) Evaluation of serum protein profiling by surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry for the detection of prostate cancer: I. Assessment of platform reproducibility. Clin. Chem., 51, 102-112.
14. Vapnik,V.N. (1995) The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York, USA.
15. Zhang,Z. et al. (2004) Three biomarkers identified from serum proteomic analysis for the detection of early stage ovarian cancer. Cancer Res., 64, 5882-5890.