3D time-resolved contrast-enhanced cerebrovascular MR angiography with subsecond frame update times using radial k-space trajectories and highly constrained projection reconstruction

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 28, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 2001-2004

  Wu, Y ^a   Kim, N ^a   Korosec, F R ^a   Turk, A ^a   Rowley, H A ^a   Wieben, O ^a   Mistretta, C A ^a   Turski, Patrick A ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b University of Wisconsin Health   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; GADODIAMIDE;

ARTICLE; BRAIN BLOOD VESSEL; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; NEUROIMAGING; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

CEREBRAL ARTERIES; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; CONTRAST MEDIA; GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INTRACRANIAL ARTERIOVENOUS MALFORMATIONS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY;

EID: 36448951564     PISSN: 01956108     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A0772     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Kwan ES, Hall A, Enzmann DR. Quantitative analysis of intracranial circulation using rapid-sequence DSA. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1986;146:1239-45
2. Wetzel SG, Bilecen D, Lyrer P, et al. Cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas: detection by dynamic MR projection angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:1293-95
3. Griffiths PD, Hoggard N, Warren DJ, et al. Brain arteriovenous malformations: assessment with dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1892-99
4. Hans FJ, Reinges MH, Reipke P, et al. Clinical applications of 2-D dynamic contrast-enhanced MR subtraction angiography in neurosurgery: preliminary results. Zentralbl Neurochir 2005;66:170-79
5. Nagaraja S, Capener D, Coley SC, et al. Brain arteriovenous malformations: measurement of nidal volume using a combination of static and dynamic magnetic resonance angiography techniques. Neuroradiology 2005;47:387-92
6. Korosec FR, Frayne R, Grist TM, et al. Time-resolved contrast-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:345-51
7. Carroll TJ, Korosec FR, Pertermann GM, et al. Carotid bifurcation: evaluation of time-resolved three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 2001;220:525-32
8. Cashen TA, Carr JC, Shin W, et al. Intracranial time-resolved contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3T. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:822-29
9. Farb RI, McGregor C, Kim JK, et al. Intracranial arteriovenous malformations: real-time auto-triggered elliptic centric-ordered 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography: initial assessment. Radiology 2001;220:244-51
10. Duran M, Schoenberg SO, Yuh WT, et al. Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: morphologic evaluation by ultrashort 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Eur Radiol 2002;12:2957-64
11. Gauvrit JY, LeClerc X, Oppenheim C, et al. Three-dimensional dynamic MR digital subtraction angiography using sensitivity encoding for the evaluation of intracranial arteriovenous malformations: a preliminary study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1525-31
12. Nael K, Michaely H, Villablanca P, et al. Time-resolved contrast- enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the head and neck at 3.0 tesla: initial results. Invest Radiol 2006;41:116-24
13. Rabiner LR, Gold B. Theory and Application of Digital Signal Processing. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc; 1975:chaps 6 and 10, 365, 578
14. Maki JH, Prince MR, Londy FJ, et al. The effects of time varying intravascular signal intensity and k-space acquisition order on three-dimensional MR angiography image quality. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:642-51