Context-dependent term relations for Information Retrieval

COLING/ACL 2006 - EMNLP 2006: 2006 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 551-559

  Bai, Jing ^a   Nie, Jian Yun ^a   Cao, Guihong ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION RETRIEVAL;

CO-OCCURRENCE; CO-OCCURRENCE ANALYSIS; CONTEXT DEPENDENT; CONTEXT-DEPENDENT RELATION; CONTEXT-WORD; ITS APPLICATIONS; QUERY EXPANSION; TREC COLLECTION;

NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 36448950906     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/1610075.1610152     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Bai, J., Song, D., Bruza, P., Nie, J. Y. and Cao, G. 2005. Query expansion using term relationships in language models for information retrieval, ACM CIKM, pp. 688-695.
2. Berger, A. and Lafferty, J. 1999. Information retrieval as statistical translation. ACM SIGIR, pp. 222-229.
3. Church, K. W. and Hanks, P. 1989. Word association norms, mutual information, and lexicography. ACL, Vol. 16, pp. 22-29.
4. Gao, J., Nie, J.Y., He, H, Chen, W., Zhou, M. 2002. Resolving query translation ambiguity using a decaying co-occurrence model and syntactic dependency relations. ACM SIGIR, pp. 11-15.
5. Jang, M. G., Myaeng, S. H., and Park, S. Y. 1999. Using mutual information to resolve query translation ambiguities and query term weighting. ACL, pp. 223-229.
6. Jing, Y. and Croft, W.B. 1994. An association thesaurus for information retrieval. RIAO, pp. 146-160.
7. Lin, D. 1997. Using syntactic dependency as local context to resolve word sense ambiguity, ACL, pp. 64-71.
8. Peat, H.J. and Willett, P. 1991. The limitations of term co-occurrence data for query expansion in document retrieval systems. JASIS, 42(5): 378-383.
9. Ponte, J. and Croft, W.B. 1998. A language modeling approach to information retrieval. ACM SIGIR, pp. 275-281.
10. Qiu, Y. and Frei, H.P. 1993. Concept based query expansion. ACM SIGIR, pp.160-169.
11. Schütze, H. and Pedersen J.O. 1997. A cooccurrencebased thesaurus and two applications to information retrieval, Information Processing and Management, 33(3): 307-318.
12. Smeaton, A. F. and Van Rijsbergen, C. J. 1983. The retrieval effects of query expansion on a feedback document retrieval system. Computer Journal, 26(3): 239-246.
13. Smadja, F., McKeown, K.R., 1996. Translating collocations for bilingual lexicons: A statistical approach, Computational Linguistics, 22(1): 1-38.
14. Srikanth, M. and Srihari, R. 2002. Biterm language models for document retrieval. ACM SIGIR, pp. 425-426
15. Voorhees, E. 1994. Query expansion using lexicalsemantic relations. ACM SIGIR, pp. 61-69.
16. Yarowsky, D. 1995. Unsupervised word sense disambiguation rivaling supervised methods. ACL, pp. 189-196.
17. Zhai, C. and Lafferty, J. 2001. Model-based feedback in the language modeling approach to information retrieval. ACM SIGIR, pp. 403-410.