Modelling mean above and below ground litter production based on yield tables

Silva Fennica

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 559-574

  Wutzler, Thomas ^a   Mund, Martina ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR BIOGEOCHEMISTRY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Biomass turnover; Carbon accounting; Harvest residues; Sensitivity analysis; Soil carbon; Thinnings; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

BIOMASS; FORESTRY; HARVESTERS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

BIOMASS TURNOVER; CARBON ACCOUNTING; HARVEST RESIDUES; LITTER; SOIL CARBON;

SOIL POLLUTION;

ABOVEGROUND PRODUCTION; BELOWGROUND PRODUCTION; BIOMASS; CARBON SEQUESTRATION; CONIFEROUS TREE; FOLIAGE; GROWTH MODELING; LITTER; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOIL CARBON; THINNING; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

BIOMASS; FOREST LITTER; HARVESTING; SOIL;

CENTRAL EUROPE; EURASIA; EUROPE; GERMANY;

FAGUS; PICEA;

EID: 36448946504     PISSN: 00375330     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14214/sf.289     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (67)

1. 2 - model analyses based on forest inventory data. Biogeochemistry in press (online first) DOI 10.1007/s10533-006-9064-0.
2. Autorenkollektiv 1982. Ertragstafelauszüge 1982. Zentrale Betriebsakademie Forstwirtschaft, Abt. Ausund Weiterbildung, Markleeberg. 96 p.
3. Baritz, R. & Strich, S. 2000. Forests and the National Greenhouse Gas Inventory of Germany. Biotechnology, Agronomy, Society and Environment 4: 267-271.
4. Bergel, D. 1985. Douglasien-Ertragstafel fuer Nordwestdeutschland. 1985. 157(3/4): 149-159.
5. Böckmann, T. 1990. Wachstum und Ertrag der Winterlinde (Tilia cordata Mill) in Nordwestdeutschland. Dissertation Georg August University, Göttingen.
6. Bornkamm, R., Faensen-Thiebes, A. & Nino, M. 2003. Changes of macroscopic symptoms during the lifetime of pine needles (Pinus sylvestris L.). Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 122(6): 376-388.
7. Bowden, R.D., Nadelhoffer, K.J., Boone, R.D., Melillo, J.M. & Garrison, J.B. 1993. Contributions of aboveground litter, belowground litter, and root respiration to total soil respiration in a temperature mixed hardwood forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 23(7): 1402-1407.
8. Burschel, P., Kürsten, E. & Larson, B.C. 1993. Die Rolle von Wald und Forstwirtschaft im Kohlenstoffhaushalt - Eine Betrachtung für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland. Forstliche Forschungsberichte München - Schriftenreihe der Forstwissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Universität München und der forstlichen Versuchs- und Forschungsanstalt 126: 1-135.
9. Conover, W.J. 1980. Practical nonparametric statistics. John Wiley & Sons, New York. 493 p.
10. de Wit, H.A., Palosuo, T., Hylen, G. & Liski, J. 2006. A carbon budget of forest biomass and soils in southeast Norway calculated using a widely applicable method. Forest Ecology and Management 225(1-3): 15-26.
11. Dieter, M. & Elsasser, P. 2002. Carbon stocks and carbon stock changes in the tree biomass of Germany's forests. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 121(4): 195-210.
12. Dittmar, O., Knapp, E. & Lembcke, G. 1986. DDR Buchenertragstafel 1983. IFE-Berichte aus Forschung und Entwicklung 4: 1-59.
13. Erteld, W. 1962. Ertragstafelauszüge für den Gebrauch in der Praxis. Neumann Verlag. 170 p.
14. Fahey, T.J., Siccama, T.G., Driscoll, C.T., Likens, G.E., Campbell, J., Johnson, C.E., Battles, J.J., Aber, J.D., Cole, J.J. & Fisk, M.C. 2005. The biogeochemistry of carbon at Hubbard Brook. Biogeochemistry 75: 109-176.
15. Gentle, J.E. 1985. Monte Carlo methods. In: Kotz, S. & Johnson, N.L. (eds.). Encyclopedia of statistics 5. John Wiley & Sons, New York. p. 612-617.
16. Godbold, D.L., Hoosbeek, M.R., Lukac, M., Cotrufo, M.F., Janssens, I.A., Ceulemans, R., Polle, A., Velthorst, E.J., Scarascia-Mugnozza, G., De Angelis, P., Miglietta, F. & Peressotti, A. 2006. Mycorrhizal hyphal turnover as a dominant process for carbon input into soil organic matter. Plant and Soil 281(1-2): 15-24.
17. Hamby, D.M. 1994. A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental-models. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 32(2): 135-154.
18. Harmon, M.E., Garman, S.L. & Ferrell, W.K. 1996. Modeling historical patterns of tree utilization in the Pacific Northwest: Carbon sequestration implications. Ecological Applications 6(2): 641-652.
19. Heinsdorf, M., Heinze, M. & Fiedler, H.J. 1993. Changes of nutrient element dynamics in the needles of a pine plantation. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt 112(3): 179-190.
20. Högberg, P. & Read, D.J. 2006. Towards a more plant physiological perspective on soil ecology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 21(10): 548-554.
21. Hutchings, M.J. & John, E.A. 2004. The effects of environmental heterogeneity on root growth and root/shoot partitioning. Annals of Botany 94(1): 1-8.
22. Jalkanen, A., Mäkipää, R., Ståhl, G., Lehtonen, A. & Petersson, H. 2005. Estimation of the biomass stock of trees in Sweden: comparison of biomass equations and age-dependent biomass expansion factors. Annals of Forest Science 62(8): 845-851.
23. Jandl, R., Neumann, M. & Eckmullner, O. 2007. Productivity increase in Northern Austria Norway spruce forests due to changes in nitrogen cycling and climate. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science - Zeitschrift für Pflanzenernahrung und Bodenkunde 170(1): 157-165.
24. Kaipainen, T., Liski, J., Pussinen, A. & Karjalainen, T. 2004. Managing carbon sinks by changing rotation length in European forests. Environmental Science & Policy 7(3): 205-219.
25. Knorr, W. & Kattge, J. 2005. Inversion of terrestrial ecosystem model parameter values against eddy covariance measurements by Monte Carlo sampling. Global Change Biology 11(8): 1333-1351.
26. Kramer, H. & Akça, A. 1995. Leitfaden zur Waldmeßlehre. SauerländerVerlag, Frankfurt am Main. 266 p.
27. Kurth, H., Gerold, D. & Ulbricht, R. 1994. Forsteinrichtung - Nachhaltige Regelung des Waldes. Deutscher Landwirtschaftsverlag Berlin GmbH, Berlin. ISBN 3-331-00589-4.
28. Lehtonen, A., Mäkipää, R., Heikkinen, J., Sievänen, R. & Liski, J. 2004a. Biomass expansion factors (BEFs) for Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch according to stand age for boreal forests. Forest Ecology and Management 188(1-3): 211-224.
29. _ , Sievänen, R., Mäkelä, A., Mäkipää, S., Korhonen, K.T. & Hokkanen, T. 2004b. Potential litterfall of Scots pine branches in southern Finland. Ecological Modelling 180(2-3): 305-315.
30. Lembcke, G., Knapp, E. & Dittmar, O. 1976. DDR-Kiefern-Ertragstafel 1975. Institut für Forstwissenschaften Eberswalde.
31. Levy, P.E., Hale, S.E. & Nicoll, B.C. 2004. Biomass expansion factors and root : shoot ratios for coniferous tree species in Great Britain. Forestry 77(5): 421-430.
32. Liski, J., Lehtonen, A., Palosuo, T., Peltoniemi, M., Eggers, T., Muukkonen, P. & Mäkipää, R. 2006. Carbon accumulation in Finland's forests 1922-2004 - an estimate obtained by combination of forest inventory data with modelling of biomass, litter and soil. Annals of Forest Science 63(7): 687-697.
33. 2 emissions and sinks according to UNFCCC and EU monitoring mechanism: forest and other wooded land. Biotechnology, Agronomy, Society and Environment 4: 315-319.
34. Majdi, H., Pregitzer, K., Moren, A.S., Nylund, J.E. & Ågren, G.I. 2005. Measuring fine root turnover in forest ecosystems. Plant and Soil 276(1-2): 1-8.
35. Matamala, R., Gonzalez-Meler, M.A., Jastrow, J.D., Norby, R.J. & Schlesinger, W.H. 2003. Impacts of fine root turnover on forest NPP and soil C sequestration potential. Science 302(5649): 1385-1387.
36. McArdle, R.E. 1961. The yield of Douglas fir in the Pacific Northwest. USDA Technical Bulletin 201. Washington, D.C. 74 p.
37. Morgan, M. & Henrion, M. 1990. Uncertainty. A guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. Cambridge University Press.
38. Mulia, R. & Dupraz, C. 2006. Unusual fine root distributions of two deciduous tree species in southern france: What consequences for modelling of tree root dynamics? Plant and Soil 281(1-2): 71-85.
39. Mund, M. 2004. Carbon pools European beech forests (Fagus sylvatica) under different silvicultural management. Berichte des Forschungszentrums Waldökosysteme A 189. University Göttingen. 255 p.
40. _ , Kummetz, E., Hein, M., Bauer, G.A. & Schulze, E.-D. 2002. Growth and carbon stocks of a spruce forest chronosequence in Central Europe. Forest Ecology and Management 171: 275-296.
41. Muukkonen, P. & Lehtonen, A. 2004. Needle and branch biomass turnover rates of Norway spruce (Picea abies). Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34(12): 2517-2527.
42. Nagel, J. 1999. Konzeptionelle Überlegungen zum schrittweisen Aufbau eines waldwachstumskundlichen Simulationssystems für Nordwestdeutschland. Schriften aus der Forstlichen Fakultät der Universität Göttingen und der Nieders. Forstl. Versuchsanstalt 128. 122 p.
43. _ 2003. TreeGrOSS: Tree Growth Open Source Software - a tree growth model component. Programmdokumentation Niedersächsischen Forstlichen Versuchsanstalt, Abteilung Waldwachstum, Göttingen. 25 p.
44. Nicke, A. 1997. Ertragstafelauszüge. Lehrmaterial Fachhochschule für Forstwirtschaft in Schwarzburg. 255 p.
45. Nishizono, T., Iehara, T., Kuboyama, H. & Fukuda, M. 2005. A forest biomass yield table based on an empirical model. Journal of Forest Research 10(3): 211-220.
46. Peltoniemi, M., Mäkipää, R., Liski, J. & Tamminen, P. 2004. Changes in soil carbon with stand age - an evaluation of a modelling method with empirical data. Global Change Biology 10(12): 2078-2091.
47. _ , Palosuo, T., Monni, S. & Mäkipää, R. 2006. Factors affecting the uncertainty of sinks and stocks of carbon in Finnish forests soils and vegetation. Forest Ecology and Management 232(1-3): 75-85.
48. _ , Thürig, E., Ogle, S., Palosuo, T., Schrumpf, M., Wutzler, T., Butterbach-Bahl, K., Chertov, O., Komarov, A., Mikhailov, A., Gardenäs, A., Perry, C., Liski, J., Smith, P. & Mäkipää, R. 2007. Models in country scale carbon accounting of forest soils. Silva Fennica 41(3).
49. Regina, I.S. & Tarazona, T. 2001. Nutrient cycling in a natural beech forest and adjacent planted pine in northern Spain. Forestry 74(1): 11-28.
50. Reijnders, L. 2006. Conditions for the sustainability of biomass based fuel use. Energy Policy 34(7): 863-876.
51. Schober, R. 1987. Ertragstafeln wichtiger Baumarten 3. erw. Aufl. J. D. Sauerländers Verlag, Frankfurt (a. Main).
52. Smith, J.E. & Heath, L.S. 2001. Identifying influences on model uncertainty: an application using a forest carbon budget model. Environmental Management 27(2): 253-267.
53. Tjurin, A. & Naumenko, I. 1956. Forstliches Hilfsbuch für Waldtaxation. Moskva.
54. UNFCCC 1997. Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change.
55. Vanninen, P. & Mäkelä, A. 1999. Fine root biomass of Scots pine stands differing in age and soil fertility in southern Finland. Tree Physiology 19(12): 823-830.
56. Vose, D. 1996. Quantitative risk analysis: a guide to Monte Carlo simulation modelling. John Wiley & Sons. 328 p.
57. Wachter, H. 1985. Zur Lebensdauer von Fichtennadeln in einigen Waldgebieten Nordrhein-Westfalens. Forst- und Holzwirt 40: 420-425.
58. Weber, G. 2003. Hilfstafeln zur naturalen Betriebssteuerung. Thüringer Landesanstalt für Wald, Jagd und Fischerei. Gotha. 107 p.
59. Weiss, P., Schieler, K., Schadauer, K., Radunsky, K. & Englisch, M. 2000. Die Kohlenstoffbilanz des österreichischen Waldes und Betrachtungen zum Kyoto-Protokoll. (The carbon balance of the Austrian forest and considerations in view of the Kyoto-protocol). Monographien. Umweltbundesamt, Vienna, Austria.
60. Wenk, G., Römisch, K. & Gerold, D. 1985. DDRFichtenertragstafel1984. Series DDR-Fichtenertragstafel1984. Technische Universität Dresden - Sektion Forstwissenschaft, Agrarwissenschaftliche Gesellschaft der DDR. 64 p.
61. Wimmenauer. 1919. Wachstum und Ertrag der Esche. Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitschrift: 2-17.
62. Winzer, P.J. 2000. Accuracy of error propagation exemplified with ratios of random variables. Review of Scientific Instruments 71(3): 1447-1454.
63. Wirth, C. & Schumacher, J. 2002. Biomass functions for Norway spruce in Central Europe. Präsentation COST E21 Workshop 4-5 July 2002, Besalu.
64. _ , Schulze, E.-D., Schwalbe, G., Tomczyk, S., Weber, G. & Weller, E. 2004. Dynamik der Kohlenstoffvorräte in den Wäldern Thüringens - Abschlussbericht zur 1. Phase des BMBF-Projektes "Modelluntersuchung zu Umsetzung des Kyoto-Protokolls". Thüringer Landesanstalt für Jagd, Wald und Fischerei. Jena Gotha. 300 p.
65. Wutzler, T. & Reichstein, M. 2007. Soils apart from equilibrium - consequences for soil carbon balance modelling. Biogeosciences 4: 125-136.
66. _ & Wirth, C. 2007. Generic biomass functions for common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in Central Europe - predictions and components of uncertainty. Canadian Journal of Forest Research submitted.
67. Zianis, D., Muukkonen, D., Mäkipää, R. & Mencuccini, M. 2005. Biomass and stem volume equations for tree species in Europe. Silva Fennica Monograph 4. 64 p.