Chemical indicators of sulfate sensitivity to nitrogen oxides and volatile organic compounds

Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres

Volumn 107, Issue 20, 2002, Pages ACH-13-1-ACH-13-11

  Stein, Ariel F ^a,b   Lamb, Dennis ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NOAA EARTH SYSTEM RESEARCH LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

0305 Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Aerosols and particles (0345, 4801); 0317 Atmospheric Composition and Structure: Chemical kinetic and photochemical properties

Indexed keywords

AIR QUALITY; ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOLS; INDUSTRIAL EMISSIONS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NITROGEN OXIDES; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; PHOTOCHEMICAL REACTIONS; SULFUR DIOXIDE; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS;

AEROSOL; EULERIAN ANALYSIS; NITROGEN OXIDES; ORGANIC COMPOUND; SULFUR DIOXIDE; VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND;

NORTH AMERICA;

EID: 36448934941     PISSN: 01480227     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2001JD001088     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Binkowski, F. S., and U. Shankar, The regional particulate model, 1, Model description and preliminary results, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 26,191-26,209, 1995.
2. Brunekreef, B., D. W. Dockery, and M. Krzyzanowski, Epidemiologic studies on short-term effects of low levels of major ambient air pollution components, Environ. Health Perspect., 103, suppl. 2, S3-S13, 1995.
3. Calvert, J. G., F. Su, J. W. Bottenheim, and O. P. Strausz, Mechanism of the homogeneous oxidation of sulfur dioxide in the troposphere, Atmos. Environ., 12, 197-226, 1978.
4. Chang, J. S., F. S. Binkowski, N. L. Seaman, D. R. Stauffer, W. R. Stockwell, C. J. Walcek, S. Madronich, P. Middleton, J. E. Pleim, and H. H. Landsford, The regional acid deposition model and engineering model, State Sci./Tech. Rep. 4, Natl. Acid Precip. Assess. Program, Washington, D. C., 1990.
5. Dab, W., et al., Air pollution and health: Correlation or causality? The case of the relationship between exposure to particles and cardiopulmonary mortality, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 51, 220-235, 2001.
6. Daum, P. H., T. J. Kelly, and S. E. Schwartz, Measurements of the chemical composition of stratiform clouds, Atmos. Environ., 18, 2671-2684, 1984.
7. DeMore, W. B., S. P. Sander, D. M. Golden, R. F. Hampson, M. J. Kurylo, C. J. Howard, A. R. Ravishankara, C. E. Kolb, and M. J. Molina, Chemical kinetics and photochemical data for use in stratospheric modeling, evaluation number 12, JPL Publ., 97-04, 269 pp., 1997.
8. Dennis, R. L., D. W. Byun, J. H. Novae, K. J. Galluppi, C. J. Coats, and M. A. Vouk, The next generation of integrated air quality modeling: EPA's MODELS-3, Atmos. Environ., 30, 1925-1938, 1996.
9. Eggleton, A. E. J., and R. A. Cox, Homogeneous oxidation of sulphur compounds in the atmosphere, Atmos. Environ., 12, 227-230, 1978.
10. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Air quality criteria for particulate matter, vol. 1, Rep. EPA/600/P-95/001aF, Off. of Res. and Dev., Washington, D. C., 1996a.
11. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), User's guide for MOBILE 5a (Mobile Source Emission Factor Model), Rep. EPA-AA-TEB-92-01, Off. of Mobile Sources, Washington, D. C., 1996b.
12. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Science algorithms of the EPA MODELS-3 community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) modeling system, Rep. EPA/600/R-99/030, Off. of Res. and Dev., Washington, D. C., 1999.
13. Grell, G. A., J. Dudhia, and D. R. Stauffer, A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5), Tech. Note NCAR/TN-398+STR, 122 pp., Natl. Cent. for Atmos. Res., Boulder, Colo., 1994.
14. Hanna, S. R., G. E. Moore, and M. E. Femau, Evaluation of photochemical grid models (UAM-IV, UAM-V, and the ROM/UAM-IV couple) using data from the Lake Michigan Ozone Study (LMOS), Atmos. Environ., 30, 3265-3279, 1996.
15. Hidy, G. M., J. M. Hales, P. M. Roth, and R. Scheffe, Fine particles and oxidant pollution: Developing an agenda for cooperative research, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 50, 613-632, 2000.
16. x regimes, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 20,721-20,733, 1991.
17. 2 source region, Atmos. Environ., Part A, 25, 2023-2028, 1991.
18. Mathur, R., R. D. Saylor, and L. K. Peters, The STEM-II regional scale acid deposition and photochemical oxidant model, IV, The impact of emission reductions on mesoscale acid deposition in the lower Ohio River valley, Atmos. Environ., 26A, 841-861, 1992.
19. x emissions, J. Geophys. Res., 99, 3533-3542, 1994.
20. Misra, P. K., R. Bloxam, C. Fung, and S. Wong, Non-linear response of wet deposition to emission reduction: A model study, Atmos. Environ., 23, 671-687, 1989.
21. x, http://charm.larc.nasa.gov/GUIDE/dataset_documents/base_narsto_dataset.html, Langley Atmos. Sci. Data Cent., NASA Langley Res. Cent., Hampton, Va., 1998.
22. Pandis, S. N., and J. H. Seinfeld, Mathematical modeling of acid deposition due to radiating fog, J. Geophys. Res., 94, 12,911-12,923, 1989.
23. Pierce, T., C. Geron, L. Bender, R. Dennis, G. Tonnesen, and A. Guenther, Influence of increased isoprene emissions on regional ozone modeling, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 25,611-25,629, 1998.
24. Rolph, G. D., R. R. Draxlor, and R. G. de Pena, Modeling sulfur concentrations and depositions in the United States during ANATEX, Atmos. Environ., Part A, 26, 73-93, 1992.
25. Sakugawa, H., I. R. Kaplan, W. Tsai, and Y. Cohen, Atmospheric hydrogen peroxide: Does it share a role with ozone in degrading air quality?, Environ. Sci. Technol., 24, 1452-1462, 1990.
26. Seaman, N. L., and S. A. Michelson, NARSTO-Northeast study, J. Appl. Meteorol., 39, 384-398, 1995.
27. Seinfeld, J. H., and S. N. Pandis, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change, 1326 pp., John Wiley, New York, 1998.
28. Shin, W.-C., and G. R. Carmichael, Sensitivity of acid production/deposition to emission reductions, Environ. Sci. Technol., 26, 715-725, 1992.
29. x-hydrocarbon sensitivity in urban locations, J. Geophys. Res., 100, 14,175-14,188, 1995.
30. Sillman, S., J. A. Logan, and S. C. Wofsy, The sensitivity of ozone to nitrogen oxides and hydrocarbons in regional ozone episodes, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 1837-1851, 1990.
31. x-hydrocarbon sensitivity: Case studies from Atlanta, New York, and Los Angeles, J. Air Waste Manage. Assoc., 47, 1030-1040, 1997.
32. Sistla, G., W. Hao, J.-Y. Ku, G. Kallos, K. Zhang, H. Mao, and S. T. Rao, An operational evaluation of two regional-scale ozone air quality modeling systems over the eastern United States, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 82, 945-964, 2001.
33. Stein, A. F., and D. Lamb, The sensitivity of sulfur wet deposition to atmospheric oxidants, Atmos. Environ., 34, 1681-1690, 2000.
34. Stockwell, W. R., The effect of gas-phase chemistry on aqueous-phase sulfur dioxide oxidation rates, J. Atmos. Chem., 19, 317-329, 1994a.
35. Stockwell, W. R., Communication concerning "The role of clouds in tropospheric photochemistry" by Lelieveld and Crutzen, J. Atmos. Chem., 18, 397-399, 1994b.
36. 2 reaction, Atmos. Environ., 17, 2231-2235, 1983.
37. Stockwell, W. R., P. Middleton, and J. S. Chang, The second generation regional acid deposition model chemical mechanism for regional air quality modeling, J. Geophys. Res., 95, 16,343-16,367, 1990.
38. Tesche, T. W., P. Georgopoulos, J. H. Seinfeld, F. Lurmann, and P. M. Roth, Improvement in procedures for evaluating photochemical models, Rep. A832-103, Calif. Air Resour. Board, Sacramento, Calif., 1990.
39. Van Valin, C. C., M. Luria, J. D. Ray, and J. F. Boatman, A comparison of surface and airborne trace gas measurements at a rural Pennsylvania site, J. Geophys. Res., 96, 20,745-20,754, 1991.