Effect of row spacing on weed management in glufosinate-resistant cotton

Weed Technology

Volumn 21, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 489-495

  Wilson Jr , David G ^a   York, Alan C ^a   Jordan, David L ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Herbicide resistant crops; Liberty Link cotton; Narrow row cotton

Indexed keywords

COTTON; CROP PRODUCTION; CULTIVAR; GRASS; HERBICIDE; PESTICIDE RESISTANCE; TRANSGENIC PLANT; WEED CONTROL;

NORTH AMERICA; NORTH CAROLINA; UNITED STATES;

AMARANTHUS; AMARANTHUS CAUDATUS; AMARANTHUS HYBRIDUS; AMARANTHUS PALMERI; DIGITARIA SANGUINALIS; GOSSYPIUM HIRSUTUM; IPOMOEA; IPOMOEA LACUNOSA; IPOMOEA PURPUREA; PANICUM DICHOTOMIFLORUM; POACEAE; UROCHLOA PLATYPHYLLA;

EID: 36448931661     PISSN: 0890037X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1614/WT-06-089.1     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Anonymous. 2006. Ignite 280 SL herbicide label. Bayer CropScience, Research Triangle Park, NC, Web page: http://www.cdms.net/Idat/Id7AQ000.pdf.
2. Beyers, J. T., R. J. Smeda, and W. G. Johnson. 2002. Weed management programs in glufosinate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 16:267-273.
3. Blair-Kerth, L. K., P. A. Dotray, J. W. Keeling, J. R. Gannaway, M. J. Oliver, and J. E. Quisenberry. 2001. Tolerance of transformed cotton to glufosinate. Weed Sci. 49:375-380.
4. Bradley, P. R., W. G. Johnson, S. E. Hart, M. J. Buessinger, and R. E. Massey. 2000. Economics of weed management in glufosinate-resistant corn (Zea mays L.). Weed Technol. 14:495-501.
5. Bullen, S. G. and B. Brown. 2000. Economic evaluation of ultra narrow row cotton on a whole farm basis. Pages 287-289 in P. Dugger and D. Richter, eds. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America, Web page: http://www.cotton.org/beltwide/proceedings/ 2000/abstracts/140.cfm. Accessed: April 11, 2006.
6. Coetzer, E., K. Al-Khatib, and D. E. Peterson. 2002. Glufosinate efficacy on Amaranthus species in glufosinate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 16:326-331.
7. Corbett, J. L., S. D. Askew, W. E. Thomas, and J. W. Wilcut. 2004. Weed efficacy evaluations for bromoxynil, glufosinate, glyphosate, pyrithiobac, and sulfosate. Weed Technol. 18:443-453.
8. Crooks, H. L., A. C. York, A. S. Culpepper, and C. Brownie. 2004. CGA-362622 antagonizes annual grass control by graminicides in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Weed Technol. 17:373-380.
9. Culpepper, A. S. and A. C. York. 1999. Weed management in glufosinate-resistant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 12:554-559.
10. Culpepper, A. S., A. C. York, R. B. Batts, and K. M. Jennings. 2000. Weed management in glufosinate- and glyphosate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 14:77-88.
11. Dekker, J. and S. O. Duke. 1995. Herbicide-resistant field crops. Adv. Agron. 54:69-116.
12. Devine, M. D., S. O. Duke, and C. Fedtke. 1993. Inhibition of amino acid biosynthesis. Pages 251-291 in Physiology of Herbicide Action. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13. Frans, R. E., R. Talbert, D. Marx, and H. Crowley. 1986. Experimental design and techniques for measuring and analyzing plant responses to weed control practices. Pages 29-46 in N. D. Camper, ed. Research Methods in Weed Science. Champaign, IL: Southern Weed Science Society.
14. Gardner, A. P., A. C. York, D. L. Jordan, and D. W. Monks. Management of annual grasses and Amaranthus spp. in glufosinate-resistant cotton. J. Cotton Sci. 10:328-338.
15. Hamill, A. S., S. Z. Knezevic, K. Chandler, P. H. Sikkema, F. J. Tardif, A. Shrestha, and C. J. Swanton. 2000. Weed control in glufosinate-resistant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 14:578-585.
16. Hinchee, M. A. W., S. R. Padgette, G. M. Kishore, X. Delannay, and R. T. Fraley. 1993. Herbicide-tolerant crops. Pages 243-263 in S. Kung and R. Wu, eds. Transgenic Plants. San Diego, CA: Academic.
17. Hock, S. M., S. Z. Knezevic, A. R. Martin, and J. L. Lindquist. 2006. Soybean row spacing and weed emergence time influence weed competitiveness and competitive indices. Weed Sci. 54:38-46.
18. Johnson, G. A. and T. R. Hoverstad. 2002. Effect of row spacing and herbicide application timing on weed control and grain yield in corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 16:548-553.
19. Johnson, W. C. III, E. P. Prostko, and B. G. Mullinix Jr. 2005. Improving the management of dicot weeds in peanut with narrow row spacings and reduced herbicides. Agron. J. 97:85-88.
20. Jones, C. A., J. M. Chandler, J. E. Morrison Jr, S. A. Senseman, and C. H. Tingle. 2001. Glufosinate combinations and row spacing for weed control in glufosinate-resistant corn (Zea mays). Weed Technol. 15:141-147.
21. Karnei, J. R. 2005. The agronomics and economics of 15-inch cotton. 601 p in P. Dugger and D. Richter, eds. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America, Web page: http://www.cotton.org/beltwide/proceedings/2005/pdfs/2792.pdf. Accessed: April 11, 2006.
22. Lanier, J. E., G. S. Hamm, G. D. Collins, N. G. Bullins, A. P. Gardner, A. C. York, D. G. Wilson Jr, and K. L. Edmisten. 2005. Adapting a two-row John Deere 9910 to harvest 15-inch cotton for small plot research. Pages 2003 in P. Dugger and D. Richter, eds. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America, Web page: http://www.cotton.org/beltwide/proceedings/2005/pdfs/2353.pdf. Accessed: April 11, 2006.
23. Leuschen, W. E., J. H. Ford, S. D. Evans, B. K. Kanne, T. R. Hoverstad, G. W. Randall, J. H. Orf, and D. R. Hicks. 1992. Tillage, row spacing, and planting date effects on soybean following corn and wheat. J. Prod. Agric. 5:254-260.
24. McAllister, D. D. III and C. D. Rogers. 2005. The effect of harvesting procedures on fiber and yarn quality of ultra-narrow-row cotton. J. Cotton Sci. 9:15-23 Webpage: www.cotton.org/journal/2005-09/1/upload/jcs09-015.pdf. Accessed: April 11, 2006.
25. Murdock, E. C., M. A. Jones, J. E. Toler, and R. F. Graham. 2003. South Carolina results: weed control in glufosinate-tolerant cotton. Proc. South. Weed Sci. Soc. 56:8.
26. Nichols, S. P., C. E. Snipes, and M. A. Jones. 2004. Cotton growth, lint yield, and fiber quality as affected by row spacing and cultivar J. Cotton Sci. 8:1-12 Webpage: http://cotton.org/journal/2004-08/1/upload/jcs08-001.pdf. Accessed: April 11, 2006.
27. Norris, J. L., D. R. Shaw, and C. E. Snipes. 2002. Influence of row spacing and residual herbicides on weed control in glufosinate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 16:319-325.
28. Norsworthy, J. K. and M. J. Oliveira. 2004. Comparison of the critical period for weed control in wide- and narrow-row corn. Weed Sci. 52:802-807.
29. Parvin, D. W. Jr., F. T. Cooke, and W. T. Molin. 2000. Commercial ultra-narrow row cotton production, Mississippi, 1999. Pages 433-436 in C. P. Dugger and D. A. Richter, eds. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America, Web page: http://www.cotton.org./beltwide/proceedings/abstracts/189.cfm. Accessed: April 11, 2006.
30. Sasser, P. E. 1981. The basics of high volume instruments for fiber testing. Pages 191-193 in J. M. Brown, ed. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America.
31. Saxton, A. M. 1998. A macro for converting mean separation output to letter groupings in Proc Mixed. Pages 1243-1246 in Proceedings of the 23rd SAS Users Group International Cary. NC: SAS.
32. Steckel, G. J., L. M. Wax, F. W. Simmons, and W. H. Phillips II. 1997. Glufosinate efficacy on annual weeds is influenced by rate and growth stage. Weed Technol. 11:484-488.
33. Vencill, W. K., ed. 2002, Herbicide Handbook. 8th ed. Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America. Pages 229-230.
34. Vories, E. D., T. D. Valco, K. J. Bryant, and R. E. Glover. 2001. Three-year comparison of conventional and ultra narrow cotton production systems. Appl. Eng. Agric. 17:583-589.
35. Wendler, C. M., M. Barniske, and A. Wild. 1990. Effect of phosphinothricin (glufosinate) on photosynthesis and photorespiration of C3 and C4 plants. Photosynth. Res. 24:55-61.
36. Wiatrak, P. J., D. L. Wright, J. A. Pudelko, B. Kidd, and W. Koziara. 1998. Conventional vs. ultra-narrow row (UNR) cotton in different tillage systems. Pages 92-94 in T. C. Keisling, ed. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Southern Conservation Tillage Conference for Sustainable Agriculture. Fayetteville, AR: Arkansas Agric. Expt. Stn, Spec. Rept. 186.
37. Wiesbrook, M. L., W. G. Johnson, S. E. Hart, P. R. Bradley, and L. M. Wax. 2001. Comparison of weed management systems in narrow-row, glyphosate-and glufosinate-resistant soybean (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 15:122-128.
38. Wilson, D. G. Jr 2006. Evaluation of Weed Management and the Agronomic Utility of Cotton Grown on a 15-Inch Row Configuration. Ph.D. dissertation. Raleigh, NC: North Carolina State University. 148 p.
39. Wright, D. L., J. J. Marois, P. J. Wiatrak, R. J. Sprenkel, J. A. Tredway, J. R. Rich, and F. M. Rhoades. 2000. Production of Ultra Narrow Row Cotton. Publ. SS-AGR-83. Gainesville, FL: Florida Cooperative Extension Service.
40. Yelverton, F. H. and H. D. Coble. 1991. Narrow row spacing and canopy formation reduces weed resurgence in soybeans (Glycine max). Weed Technol. 5:169-174.
41. York, A. C. and A. S. Culpepper. 2004. Weed management in Liberty Link and Roundup Ready Flex cotton. In D. A. Richter, ed. Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Conferences. Memphis, TN: National Cotton Council of America, Web page: http://www.cotton.org/beltwide/proceedings/2004/abstracts/M053.cfm. Accessed: April 11, 2006.